Demarginalizing the marginalized in substance abuse treatment: Stories of homeless, active substance users in an urban harm reduction based drop-in center

Addiction Research and Theory

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 622-636

  Lee, Heather Sophia ^a   Petersen, Scott R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Private Practice   (United States)

Author keywords

Demarginalization; Harm reduction; Substance abuse treatment

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450205134     PISSN: 16066359     EISSN: 14767392     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/16066350802168613     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Becker DR, Drake RE. 1994. Individual placement and support: A community mental health center approach to vocational rehabilitation. Community Mental Health Journal 30(2):193-206.
2. Carey KB. 1996. Substance use reduction in the context of outpatient psychiatric treatment: A collaborative, motivational, harm reduction approach. Community Mental Health Journal 32(3):291-316.
3. Cohen CJ. 1999. The boundaries of blackness: AIDS and the breakdown of black politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
4. Cooper LA, Beach MC, Johnson RL, Inui TS. 2006. Delving below the surface: Understanding how race and ethnicity influence relationships in health care. Journal of General Internal Medicine 21:S21-S27.
5. Delpit L. 1993. The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. In: Weis L, Fine M, editors. Beyond silenced voices: Class, race, and gender in United States schools. Albany: Suny Press. pp 119-142.
6. Denning P. 1997. Beyond the disease model: Clinical psychology and substance use management. Harm Reduction Communication 111:13-15.
7. Denning P. 2000. Practicing harm reduction psychotherapy: An alternative approach to addictions. New York: The Guilford Press.
8. DiClemente CC. 2003. Addiction and change: How addictions develop and addicted people recover. New York: The Guilford Press.
9. DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO. 1998. Towards a comprehensive, transtheoretical model of change: Stages of change and addictive behaviors. In: Miller WR, Heather N, editors. Treating addictive behaviors. New York: Plenum Press. pp 3-24.
10. Drug Policy Alliance. 2005. Race and the drug war. Retrieved November 22, 2005. Available from: http://www.drugpolicy.org/communities/race
11. Finney JW, Moos RH. 2006. Matching clients' treatment goals with treatment oriented towards abstinence, moderation or harm reduction. Addiction 101:1540-1542.
12. Freire P. 2004. Pedagogy of the oppressed. 3rd edn. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.
13. Giroux H. A. (1981). Ideology culture & the process of schooling. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
14. Greene GJ, Lee MY, Hoffpauir S. 2005. The languages of empowerment and strengths in clinical social work: A constructivist perspective. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services 86(2):267-277.
15. Imhof JE. 1995. Overcoming countertransference and other attitudinal barriers in the treatment of substance abuse. In: Washton AM, editor. Psychotherapy and substance abuse: A practitioner's handbook. New York: Guilford. pp 3-22.
16. Inciardi JA, Tims FM, Fletcher B.1993. Innovative approaches to the treatment of drug abuse: Program models and strategies. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
17. Inciardi JA, Harrison LD. 2000. Introduction: The concept of harm reduction. In: Inciardi JA, Harrison LD, editors. Harm reduction: National and international perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc. pp vii-xix.
18. Lee, HS. 2006. Participant generated outcomes of two harm reduction programs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
19. Lee HS, Zerai A. 'Everyone deserves services no matter what': Defining success in harm reduction based substance abuse treatment. In Dawson KA, MacLean B, editors. Harm reduction: A global psychosocial perspective. (in press).
20. Marlatt GA. 1996. Harm reduction: Come as you are. Addictive Behaviors 21(6):779-788.
21. Marlatt GA. (editor). 1998. Harm reduction: Pragmatic strategies for managing high risk behaviors. New York: The Guilford Press.
22. Miles MB, Huberman AM. 1994. Qualitative data analyis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
23. Miller WR. 2002. Enhancing motivation for change in substance abuse treatment (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series No. 35). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
24. Miller WR, Rollnick S. 1991. Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. 1st edn. New York: The Guilford Press.
25. Miller WR, Rollnick S. 2002. Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. 2nd edn. New York: The Guilford Press.
26. Najavits LM, Weiss RD, Shaw SR. 1997. The link between substance abuse and posttraumatic stress disorder in women: A research review. American Journal on Addictions 6(4):273-283.
27. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. NIAAA reports Project MATCH main findings. Retrieved January 14, 2005. Available from: http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/press/1996/match.htm
28. Ogborne AC, Birchmore-Timney C. 1999. A framework for the evaluation of activities and programs with harm reduction objectives. Substance Use & Misuse 34(1):69-82.
29. Rasinski KA, Woll P, Cooke A. 2005. Stigma and substance use disorders. In: Corrigan PW, editor. On the stigma of mental illness: Practical strategies for research and social change. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association. pp 219-236.
30. Reinarman C, Levine HG. 1989. Crack in context: Politics and media in the making of a drug scare. Contemporary drug problems 16:535-577.
31. Reinarman, C., & Levine, H.G. 1997. Crank in context: America's latest demon drug. In C. Reinarman & H.G. Levine (Eds.), Crack in America: Demon drugs and social justice. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 1-17.
32. Riley D, Sawka E, Conley P, Hewitt D, Mitic W, Poulin C, Room R, Single E, Topp J. 1999. Harm reduction: Concepts and practice. A policy discussion paper. Substance Use & Misuse 34(1):9-24.
33. Robinson TL. 1999. The intersections of dominant discourse across race, gender, and other identities. Journal of Counseling & Development 77:73-79.
34. Rogers CR. 1951. Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
35. Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55(1):68-78.
36. Stimson GV. 1998. Harm reduction in action: Putting theory into practice. International Journal of Drug Policy 9:401-409.
37. Strauss A, Corbin J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
38. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2000. Needing and receiving treatment for illicit drug use. Retrieved May 22, 2005. Available from http://www.drugabusestatistics.samhsa.gov/Dependence/ chapter4.htm
39. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2002. Reasons for not receiving substance abuse treatment. Retrieved December 18, 2005. Available from http://oas.samhsa.gov/2k3/SAnoTX/SAnoTX.cfm
40. Tatarsky A. 2002. Harm reduction psychotherapy: A new treatment for drug and alcohol problems. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson, Inc.
41. Tatarsky A. 2003. Harm reduction psychotherapy: Extending the reach of traditional substance use treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 25:249-256.
42. Tesch R. 1990. Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: The Falmer Press.
43. van Wormer K, Davis DR. 2003. Addiction treatment. A strengths perspective. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
44. Vasas EB. 2005. Examining the margins: A concept analysis of marginalization. Advances in Nursing Science 28(3):194-202.
45. Wallace BC. 2005. Making mandated addiction treatment work. New York: Jason Aronson, Inc.
46. Wallerstein N, Sanchez-Merki V. 1994. Freirian praxis in health education: Research results from an adolescent prevention program. Health Education Research 9(1):105-118.
47. Zelvin E, Davis DR. 2001. Harm reduction and abstinence based recovery: A dialogue. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions 1:121-133.
48. Zerai A, Banks R. 2002. Dehumanizing discourse, anti-drug law, and policy in America: A "crack mother's" nightmare. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.