Product substitution and dual sourcing under random supply failures

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 45, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1251-1265

  Lu, Mengshi ^a   Huang, Simin ^a   Shen, Zuo Jun Max ^b  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Dual souring; Product substitution; Supply chain disruptions

Indexed keywords

RESEARCH; TRANSPORTATION;

DEMAND VARIABILITY; DUAL SOURCING; DUAL SOURING; EFFECT OF SUBSTITUTION; OPTIMAL POLICIES; PRODUCT SUBSTITUTIONS; SUBSTITUTABLE PRODUCTS; SUPPLY-CHAIN DISRUPTIONS;

SUPPLY CHAINS;

DEMAND ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL METHOD; OPTIMIZATION; POLICY STRATEGY;

EID: 80051950794     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anupindi R., Akella R. Diversification under supply uncertainty. Management Science 1993, 39(8):944-963.
2. Babich V., Burnetas A., Ritchken P. Competition and diversification effects in supply chains with supplier default risk. Manufacture & Service Operations Management 2007, 9(2):123-146.
3. Bassok Y., Anupindi R., Akella R. Single period multiproduct inventory models with substitution. Operations Research 1999, 47(4):632-642.
4. Chopra S., Reinhardt G., Mohan U. The importance of decoupling recurrent and disruption risks in a supply chain. Naval Research Logistics 2007, 54(5):544-555.
5. Gupta D. The (Q, r) inventory system with an unreliable supplier. INFOR 1996, 34(2):59-76.
6. Hoffman, A., 1963. On simple linear programming problem. In: Klee, V. (Ed.), Convexity: Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Math, vol. 7.
7. Hsu A., Bassok Y. Random yield and random demand in a production system with downward substitution. Operations Research 1999, 47(2):277-290.
8. Kall P., Wallace S. Stochastic Programming 1994, John Wiley & Sons. second ed.
9. McGillivray A., Silver E. Some concepts for inventory control under substitutable demands. INFOR 1978, 16(1):47-63.
10. Moinzadeh K., Aggarwal P. Analysis of a production/inventory system subject to random disruptions. Management Science 1997, 43(11):1577-1588.
11. Netessine S., Rudi N. Centralized and competitive inventory models with demand substitution. Operations Research 2003, 51(2):329-335.
12. Parlar M., Berkin D. Future supply uncertainty in EOQ models. Naval Research Logistics 1991, 38(1):107-121.
13. Parlar M., Goyal S. Optimal ordering decisions for two substitutable products with stochastic demands. Opsearch 1984, 21(1):1-15.
14. Qi L., Shen Z.-J.M., Snyder L.V. The effect of supply disruptions on supply chain design decisions. Transportation Science 2008, 44(2):274-289.
15. Qi L., Shen Z.-J.M., Snyder L.V. A continuous-review inventory model with disruptions at both supplier and retailer. Production and Operations Management 2009, 18(5):516-532.
16. Rajaram K., Tang C. The impact of product substitution on retail merchandising. European Journal of Operational Research 2001, 135(3):582-601.
17. Ramasesh R., Ord J., Hayya J., Pan A. Sole versus dual sourcing in stochastic lead-time (s, Q) inventory models. Management Science 1991, 37(4):428-433.
18. Rao U., Swaminathan J., Zhang J. Multi-product inventory planning with downward substitution, stochastic demand and setup costs. IIE Transactions 2004, 36(1):59-71.
19. Rudolph, B., 2010. Volcano Disrupts BMW Supply Chain to S.C. The Greenville News. http://www.thestate.com/2010/04/20/1251405/volcano-disrupts-bmw-supply-chain.html.
20. Schmitt, A.J., Snyder, L.V., Shen, Z.-J.M., 2008. Centralization versus Decentralization: Risk Pooling, Risk Diversification, and Supply Uncertainty in a One-warehouse Multiple-retailer System. Working Paper, P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Lehigh University.
21. Schmitt A.J., Snyder L.V., Shen Z.-J.M. Inventory systems with stochastic demand and supply: properties and approximations. European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 206(2):313-328.
22. Sheffi Y. The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage 2005, The MIT Press, Boston.
23. Shen Z.-J.M. Integrated supply chain design models: a survey and future research directions. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization 2007, 3(1):1-27.
24. Snyder, L.V., 2008. A Tight Approximation for an EOQ Model with Supply Disruptions. Working Paper, P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Lehigh University.
25. Tang C. Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Logistics 2006, 9(1):33-45.
26. Tang C.S., Tomlin B.T. The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics 2008, 116(1):12-27.
27. Tomlin B. On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Science 2006, 52(5):639-657.
28. Tomlin B. Disruption-management strategies for short life-cycle products. Naval Research Logistics 2009, 56(4):318-347.
29. Tomlin, B., Snyder, L.V., 2007. On the Value of a Threat Advisory System for Managing Supply Chain Disruptions. Working Paper, Kenan-Flagler School of Business, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
30. Tomlin B., Wang Y. On the value of mix flexibility and dual sourcing in unreliable newsvendor networks. Manufacture & Service Operations Management 2005, 7(1):37-57.
31. Trendall, S., 2010. Volcano Crisis Causes Supply Chain Headache. CRN News. http://www.channelweb.co.uk/crn/news/2261759/volcano-crisis-cause-supply.
32. Yang, Z., Aydin, G., Babich, V., Beil, D.R., 2008. Supply Disruptions, Asymmetric Information, and a Dual-sourcing Option. Working paper, Dept. Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan.