Photoelastic analysis of cemented or screwed implant-supported prostheses with different prosthetic connections

Journal of Oral Implantology

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 401-410

  Tonella, Bianca Piccolotto ^a   Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza ^a   Ferraço, Renato ^a   Falcón Antenucci, Rosse Mary ^a   De Carvalho, Paulo S Perri ^a   Goiato, Marcelo Coelho ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Fixed partial denture; Implant supported fixed partial denture

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM DERIVATIVE; NICKEL;

ARTICLE; BIREFRINGENCE; CEMENTATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; ELASTOGRAPHY; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BIREFRINGENCE; CEMENTATION; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MATERIALS TESTING; NICKEL; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 80051944288     PISSN: 01606972     EISSN: 15481336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00044     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Brunski JB. Biomaterials and biomechanics in dental implant design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:85-97.
2. Hebel KS, Gajjar R. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:28-35.
3. Ç ehreli M, Duyck J, De Cooman M, Puers R, Naert I. Implant design and interface force transfer: a photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:249-257. (Pubitemid 40109811)
4. Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Trainic T, Di lorio D, Caputo S. Fracture resistance of implant supported screw versus cement retained porcelain fused to metal single crowns SEM fractographic analysis. Dent Mater. 2007;23:296-301. (Pubitemid 46135728)
5. Rajan M, Gunaseelan R. Fabrication of a cement and screw-retained implant prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:578-580. (Pubitemid 39593590)
6. Taylor TD, Agar JR, Vogiatzi T. Implant prosthodontics: current perspective and future directions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:66-75.
7. Binon P. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15: 76-94.
8. Rangert BO, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Force and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4:241-247.
9. Maeda Y, Sato T, Sogo M. In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:75-78. (Pubitemid 43479004)
10. Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:519-526.
11. Levine RA, Clem DS, Wilson TG, Higginbottom F, Solnit G. Multicenter retrospective analysis of the ITI implant system used for single-tooth replacements: results of loading for 2 or more years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:516-520.
12. Möllersten L, Lockowandt P, Linden LA. Comparison of strength and failure mode of seven implant systems: an in vitro test. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:582-591.
13. Chee W, Jivraj S. Screw versus cemented implant supported restorations. Br Dent J. 2006;201: 501-507. (Pubitemid 44624140)
14. Bozkaya D, Muftu S, Muftu A. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92: 523-530. (Pubitemid 39593580)
15. Karl M, Taylor TD, Wichmann MG, Heckmann SM. In vitro stress behavior in cemented and screwretained five-unit implant FPDs. J Prosthodont. 2006;15: 20-24. (Pubitemid 43445603)
16. Guichet DL, Caputo AA, Choi H, Sorensen JA. Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw- or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:239-246.
17. Pietrabissa R, Gionso L, Quaglini V, Di Martino E, Simion M. An in vitro study on compensation of mismatch of screw versus cement-retained implant supported fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:448-457.
18. Weber HP, Kim DM, Ng MW, Hwang JW, Fiorellini JP. Peri-implant soft-tissue health surrounding cement- and screw-retained implant restorations: a multi-center, 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:375-379. (Pubitemid 44114701)
19. Balfour A, O'Brien GR. Comparative study of antirotational single tooth abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:36-43.
20. Caputo AA, Standlee JP. Biomechanics in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago, Ill: Quintessence Publishing Co; 1987.
21. French AA, Bowles CQ, Parham PL, Eick JD, Killoy WJ, Cobb CM. Comparison of peri-implant stresses transmitted by four commercially available osseointegrated implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1989;9:221-230.
22. Clelland NL, Gilat A, McGlumphy EA, Brantley WA. A photoelastic and strain gauge analysis of angled abutments for an implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:541-548.
23. da Silva EF, Pellizzer EP, Quinelli Mazaro JV, Garcia Júnior IR. Influence of the connector and implant design on the implant-tooth-connected prostheses. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;12:254-262.
24. Chun HJ, Shin HS, Han CH, Lee SH. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:195-202.
25. Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:290-298. (Pubitemid 127688467)
26. Weinberg LA. The biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:19-31.
27. Bidez MW, Misch CE. Force transfer in implant dentistry: basic concepts and principles. J Oral Implantol. 1992;18:264-274.