Training program for fundamental surgical skill in robotic laparoscopic surgery

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 327-333

  Suh, Irene ^a   Mukherjee, Mukul ^b   Oleynikov, Dmitry ^a   Siu, Ka Chun ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

Author keywords

Da Vinci Surgical System; Electromyography; Kinematics; Surgical education

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; LAPAROSCOPY; PERSONNEL TRAINING; ROBOTIC SURGERY; SOFTWARE TESTING; SURVEYS;

AVERAGE SPEED; DA VINCI SURGICAL SYSTEM; EFFECTIVE APPROACHES; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MEDICAL STUDENTS; PERFORMANCE; RETENTION TESTS; SURGICAL EDUCATION; SURGICAL SYSTEMS; TRAINING PROGRAM;

ELECTROMYOGRAPHY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMYOGRAM; FEMALE; FOREARM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; MEDICAL STUDENT; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL APPROACH; TRAINING; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; LAPAROSCOPY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PROCEDURES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; TASK PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051940409     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.402     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Berryhill K Jr, Jhaveri J, Yadav R, et al. Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. Urology 2008; 72: 15-23.
2. Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y, et al. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 372-378.
3. Intuitive Surgical. Accreditation Standards. Revised December 2010. Accessed December 15, 2010.
4. Chang L, Satava RM, Pellegrini CA, Sinanan MN. Robotic sur- gery: identifying the learning curve through objective measure- ment of skill. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1744-1748.
5. D'Annibale A, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, et al. The da Vinci robot in right adrenalectomy: considerations on technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2004; 14: 38-41.
6. Hance J, Aggarwal R, Undre S, Darzi A. Skills training in telerobotic surgery. Int J Med Robot 2005; 1: 7-12.
7. Moles JJ, Connelly PE, Sarti EE, Baredes S. Establishing a training program for residents in robotic surgery. Laryngoscope 2009; 119: 1927-1931.
8. Narazaki K, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N. Robotic surgery training and performance: identifying objective variables for quantifying the extent of proficiency. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 96-103.
9. Judkins T, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N. Objective evaluation of expert and novice performance during robotic surgical training tasks. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 590-597.
10. Narazaki K, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N. Objective assessment of proficiency with imanual inanimate tasks in robotic laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007; 17: 47-52.
11. Hanly EJ, Marohn MR, Bachman SL, et al. Multiservice laparoscopic surgical training using the daVinci surgical system. Am J Surg 2004; 187: 309-315.
12. Hanly EJ, Zand J, Bachman SL, et al. Value of the SAGES Learning Center in introducing new technology. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 477-483.
13. Ro CY, Toumpoulis IK, Ashton RC Jr, et al. A novel drill set for the enhancement and assessment of robotic surgical performance. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 111: 418-421.
14. Ruurda JP, van Vroonhoven TJ, Broeders IA. Robot-assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg England 2002; 84: 223-226.
15. Sarle R, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, et al. Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills. J Endourol 2004; 18: 63-67.
16. Kerr B, O'Leary JP. The training of the surgeon: Dr Halsted's greatest legacy. Am Surg 1999; 65: 1101-1102.
17. Gates EA. New surgical procedures: can our patients benefit while we learn? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 1293-1298.
18. Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, et al. Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 518-528.
19. Tsuda S, Scott D. Surgical skills training and simulation. Curr Probl Surg 2009; 46: 271-370.
20. Anastakis DJ, Wanzel KR, Brown MH, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of a 2-year curriculum in a surgical skills center. Am J Surg 2003; 185: 378-385.
21. Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa M, et al. Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 1187-1191.
22. Stefanidis D, Walters KC, Mostafavi A, Heniford BT. What is the ideal interval between training sessions during proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training? Am J Surg. 2009; 197: 126-129.
23. Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR, et al. Laboratory based training in urological microsurgery with bench model simulators: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the durability of technical skill. J Urol 2004; 172: 378-381.
24. Kaul S, Shah NL, Menon M. Learning curve using robotic surgery. Curr Urol Rep 2006; 7: 125-129.
25. Chen CC, Falcone T. Robotic gynecologic surgery: past, present, and future. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009; 52: 335-343.
26. Darzi A, Smith S, Taffinder N. Assessing operative skill. Needs to become more objective. BMJ 1999; 318: 887-888.
27. Garcia-Ruiz A, Gagner M, Miller J, et al. Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks. Arch Surg 1998; 133: 957-961.
28. Dakin GF, Gagner M. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical roboticsystems. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 574-579.
29. DeUgarte DA, Etzioni DA, Gracia C, Atkinson JB. Robotic surgery an resident training. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 960-963.
30. Prasad SM, Maniar HS, Soper NJ, et al. The effect of robotic assistance on learning curves for basiclaparosc opic skills. Am J Surg 2002; 183: 702-707.
31. Judkins T, Oleynikov D, Narazaki K, Stergiou N. Robotic surgery and training: electromyographic correlates of robotic laparoscopic training. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 824-829.
32. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 273-278.
33. Faulkner H, Regehr G, Martin J, Reznick R. Validation of an objective structured assessment of technical skill for surgical residents. Acad Med 1996; 71: 1363-1365.
34. Marshall RL, Smith JS, Gorman PJ, et al. Use of a human patient simulator in the development of resident trauma management skills. J Trauma 2001; 51: 17-21.
35. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, et al. The effect of stress-inducing conditions on the performance of a laparoscopic task. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1481-1484.