Language and persuasion: Linguistic extremity influences message processing and behavioral intentions

Journal of Language and Social Psychology

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 290-310

  Craig, Traci Y ^a   Blankenship, Kevin L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

intensity; linguistic extremity; persuasion

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051938929     PISSN: 0261927X     EISSN: 15526526     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X11407167     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abelson, R.P. (1995). Attitude extremity. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 25-42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991) Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Andersen, P.A., & Blackburn, T.R. (2004). An experimental study of language intensity and response rate in Email surveys. Communication Reports, 17, 73-84.
4. Aune, R.K., & Kikuchi, T. (1993). Effects of language intensity similarity on perceptions of credibility, relational attributions, and persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 224-238.
5. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
6. Blankenship, K.L., & Craig, T.Y. (2006). Rhetorical question use and resistance to persuasion: An attitude strength analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25, 111-128.
7. Blankenship, K.L., & Craig, T.Y. (2007). Language and persuasion: Tag questions as powerless speech or as interpreted in context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 112-118.
8. Blankenship, K.L., & Craig, T.Y. (2011). Language use and persuasion: Multiple roles for linguistic styles. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 194-205.
9. Blankenship, K.L., & Holtgraves, T. (2005). The role of different markers of linguistic powerlessness in persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 3-24.
10. Bochner, S., & Insko, C.A. (1966). Communicator discrepancy, source credibility, and opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 614-621.
11. Bowers, J. (1963). Language intensity, social introversion, and attitude change. Speech Monographs, 30, 345-352.
12. Bradac, J.J., Cargile, A.C., & Hallett, J. (2001). Language attitudes: Retrospect, conspect, and prospect. In H. Giles & P. Robinson (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 137-155). Chichester, England: Wiley.
13. Buller, D.B., Borland, R., & Burgoon, M. (1998). Impact of behavioral intention on effectiveness of message features: Evidence from the family sun safety project. Human Communication Research, 24, 433-453.
14. Buller, D.B., Burgoon, M., Hall, J.R., Levine, N., Taylor, A.M., Beach, B.H.,. . Bergen, A. (2000a). Using language intensity to increase the success of a family intervention to protect children from ultraviolet radiation: Predictions from language expectancy theory. Preventive Medicine, 30, 103-114.
15. Buller, D.B., Burgoon, M., Hall, J.R., Levine, N., Taylor, A.M., Beach, B.H.,. . Melcher, C. (2000b). Long term effects of language intensity in preventative messages on planned family solar protection. Health Communication, 12, 261-275.
16. Burgoon, M. (1995). Language expectancy theory. In C. R. Berger & M. Burgoon (Eds.) Communication and social influence processes (pp. 29-51). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
17. Burgoon, M., Jones, S., & Stewart, D. (1975). Toward a message-centered theory of persuasion: Three empirical investigations of language intensity. Human Communication Research, 1, 240-256.
18. Burgoon, M., & Miller, G.R. (1971). Prior attitude and language intensity as predictors of message style and attitude change following counterattitudinal advocacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 246-253.
19. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A.H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York, NY: Guilford.
20. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21. Fuegen, K., & Brehm, J.W. (2004). The intensity of affect and resistance to social influence. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 412-450). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Greenwald, A.G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion and attitude change. In A. Greenwald, T. Brock, & T. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 147-170). New York, NY: Academic Press.
23. Hamilton, M.A. (1998). Message variables that mediate and moderate the effect of equivocal language on source credibility. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 109-143.
24. Hamilton, M.A., & Hunter, J.E. (1998). The effect of language intensity on receiver evaluations of message source and topic. In M. Allen & R. W. Preiss (Eds.), Persuasion: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 99-138). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
25. Hamilton, M.A., Hunter, J.E., & Burgoon, M. (1990). An empirical investigation of an axiomatic model of the effect of language intensity on attitude change. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9, 235-255.
26. Hamilton, M.A., Hunter, J.E., & Boster, F.J. (1993). The elaboration likelihood model as a theory of model formation: A mathematical analysis. Communication Theory, 3, 50-64.
27. Hamilton, M.A., & Stewart, B. (1993). Extending an information processing model of language intensity effects. Communication Quarterly, 41, 231-246.
28. Hamilton, M.A., & Thompson, W.L. (1994). Testing an information processing model of message intensity effects. World Communication, 23, 1-14.
29. Insko, C.A. (1965). Verbal reinforcement of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 261-263.
30. Insko, C.A., & Cialdini, R.B. (1969). A test of three interpretations of attitudinal reinforcement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 333-341.
31. Johnson, B.T., Lin, H., Symons, C.S., Campbell, L.A., & Ekstein, G. (1995) Initial beliefs and attitudinal latitudes as factors in persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 502-511.
32. Milam, J.E., Sussman, S., Ritt-Olson, A.D., & Clyde, W. (2000). Perceived invulnerability and cigarette smoking among adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 71-80.
33. Muller, D., Judd, C.M., & Yzerbyt, V.Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
34. Ng, S.H., & Bradac, J.J. (1993). Power in language. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35. Pallak, M.S., Mueller, M., Dollar, K., Pallak, J. (1972). Effect of commitment on responsiveness to an extreme consonant communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 429-436.
36. Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
37. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo J.T., & Heesacker, M. (1981). The use of rhetorical questions in persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 432-440.
38. Petty, R.E., Haugtvedt, C.P., & Smith, S.M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 93-130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (Eds.). (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Petty, R.E., & Wegener, D.T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 323-390). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
41. Pomery, E.A., Gibbons, F.X., Reis-Bergan, M., & Gerrard, M. (2009). From willingness to intention: Experience moderates the shift from reactive to reasoned behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 984-908.
42. Rhine, R., & Severance, L. (1970). Ego involvement, discrepancy, source credibility, and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 175-190.
43. Sherif, M., & Hovland, C.I. (1953). Judgmental phenomena and scales of attitude measurement: Placement of items with individual choice of number of categories. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 48, 135-141.
44. Sherif, M., & Hovland, C.I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
45. Sherif, M., & Sherif, C.W. (1967). Attitude as the individual's own categories: The social judgment-involvement approach to attitude and attitude change. In C. W. Sherif (Ed.), Attitude, ego-involvement, and change (pp. 105-139). New York, NY: Wiley.
46. Wegener, D.T., Downing, J., Krosnick, J.A., & Petty, R.E. (1995). Measures and manipulations of strength related properties of attitudes: Current practice and future directions. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 455-487). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Wegener, D.T., & Fabrigar, L.R. (2000). Analysis and design for nonexperimental data: Addressing causal and noncausal hypotheses. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 412-450). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.