A perceptual model for disparity

ACM Transactions on Graphics

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Didyk, Piotr ^a   Ritschel, Tobias ^b,c   Eisemann, Elmar ^b   Myszkowski, Karol ^a   Seidel, Hans Peter ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS   (Germany)

^b TELECOM PARISTECH   (France)

^c INTEL CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Perception; Stereo

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR DISPARITY; HUMAN VISUAL SYSTEM; NAKED-EYE; NOVEL APPLICATIONS; OTHER APPLICATIONS; PERCEPTUAL MODEL; SPATIAL LAYOUT; STEREO; STEREO-IMAGE; VIRTUAL WORLDS;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 80051913649     PISSN: 07300301     EISSN: 15577368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1964921.1964991     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. ANSTIS, S. M., AND HOWARD, I. P. 1978. A Craik-O'Brien- Cornsweet illusion for visual depth. Vision Res., 18, 213-217. (Pubitemid 8310005)
2. BENOIT, A., CALLET, P. L., CAMPISI, P., AND COUSSEAU, R. 2008. Quality assessment of stereoscopic images. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing 2008, 659024.
3. BLAKEMORE, C. 1970. The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man. J.Physiology 211, 3, 599-622.
4. BRADSHAW, M. F., AND ROGERS, B. J. 1999. Sensitivity to horizontal and vertical corrugations defined by binocular disparity. Vision Res. 39, 18, 3049-56. (Pubitemid 29251239)
5. BROOKES, A., AND STEVENS, K. 1989. The analogy between stereo depth and brightness. Perception 18, 5, 601-614. (Pubitemid 20052362)
6. BURT, P. J., AND ADELSON, E. H. 1983. The laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. IEEE Trans. on Communications (April).
7. COUTANT, B., AND WESTHEIMER, G. 1993. Population distribution of stereoscopic ability. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 13, 1, 3-7. (Pubitemid 23078528)
8. CUTTING, J., AND VISHTON, P. 1995. Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In Perception of Space and Motion (Handbook Of Perception And Cognition), Academic Press, W. Epstein and S. Rogers, Eds., 69-117.
9. DALY, S. 1993. The visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. Digital images and human vision, 179.
10. DIDYK, P., RITSCHEL, T., EISEMAN, E., MYSZKOWSKI, K., AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2010. Adaptive image-based stereo view synthesis. In Proc. VMV.
11. HELD, R., AND BANKS, M. 2008. Misperceptions in stereoscopic displays: A vision science perspective. In Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, ACM, 23-32.
12. HOFFMAN, D., GIRSHICK, A., AKELEY, K., AND BANKS, M. 2008. Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. J. Vision 8, 3, 1-30.
13. HOWARD, I. P., AND ROGERS, B. J. 2002. Seeing in Depth, vol. 2: Depth Perception. I. Porteous, Toronto.
14. IOANNOU, G., ROGERS, B., BRADSHAW, M., AND GLENNERSTER, A. 1993. Threshold and supra-threshold senssitivity functions for stereoscopic surfaces. Investigative Ophthalmology &Visual Science 34, 1186.
15. ISHIHARA, S. 1987. Test for colour-blindness. Kanehara.
16. JULESZ, B. 1971. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception. U. Chicago Press.
17. KINGDOM, F., AND MOULDEN, B. 1988. Border effects on brightness: A rreview of findings, models and issues. Spatial Vision 3, 4, 225-62.
18. KRAWCZYK, G., MYSZKOWSKI, K., AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2007. Contrast restoration by adaptive countershading. Computer Graphics Forum 26, 3, 581-590. (Pubitemid 47606936)
19. LAMBOOIJ, M., IJSSELSTEIJN, W., FORTUIN, M., AND HEYNDERICKX, I. 2009. Visual discomfort and visual fatigue of stereoscopic displays: A review. J. Imaging Science and Technology 53, 3, 1-12.
20. LANG, M., HORNUNG, A., WANG, O., POULAKOS, S., SMOLIC, A., AND GROSS, M. 2010. Nonlinear disparity mapping for stereoscopic 3D. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 29, 4, 75:1-10.
21. LEE, B., AND ROGERS, B. 1997. Disparity modulation sensitivity for narrow-band-filtered stereograms. Vis. Res. 37, 13, 1769-77. (Pubitemid 27289118)
22. LIVINGSTONE, M. 2002. Vision and Art: The Biology of Seeing. Harry N. Abrams.
23. LUBIN, J. 1995. A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and development. In Vision models for target detection and recognition, World Scientific, P. E., Ed., 245-283.
24. LUNN, P., AND MORGAN, M. 1995. The analogy between stereo depth and brightness: a reexamination. Perception 24, 8, 901-4.
25. MANTIUK, R., MYSZKOWSKI, K., AND SEIDEL, H. 2006. A perceptual framework for contrast processing of high dynamic range images. ACM Trans. Applied Perception 3, 3, 286-308.
26. MATUSIK, W., AND PFISTER, H. 2004. 3DTV: A scalable system for real-time acquisition, transmission, and autostereoscopic display of dynamic scenes. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3, 814-824.
27. MEESTERS, L., IJSSELSTEIJN, W., AND SEUNTIENS, P. 2004. A survey of perceptual evaluations and requirements of threedimensional tv. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Transactions on 14, 3, 381-391.
28. OLIVA, A., TORRALBA, A., AND SCHYNS, P. G. 2006. Hybrid images. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 25, 527-532. (Pubitemid 44481011)
29. PALMER, S. E. 1999. Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. The MIT Press.
30. PRATT, W. K. 1991. Digital Image Processing. John Wiley &Sons.
31. PRINCE, S. J., AND ROGERS, B. J. 1998. Sensitivity to disparity corrugations in peripheral vision. Vision Res. 38, 17, 2533-7. (Pubitemid 28344781)
32. RAMANARAYANAN, G., FERWERDA, J., WALTER, B., AND BALA, K. 2007. Visual Equivalence: Towards a new standard for Image Fidelity. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 26, 3. 76.
33. RICHARDS, W. 1971. Anomalous stereoscopic depth perception. JOSA 61, 3, 410-414.
34. ROGERS, B., AND GRAHAM, M. 1983. Anisotropies in the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. Science 221, 4618, 1409-11.
35. SAZZAD, Z., YAMANAKA, S., KAWAYOKEITA, Y., AND HORITA, Y. 2009. Stereoscopic image quality prediction. In Quality of Multimedia Experience, Intl. Workshop on, IEEE, 180-185.
36. SEUNTIENS, P., MEESTERS, L., AND IJSSELSTEIJN, W. 2006. Perceived quality of compressed stereoscopic images: Effects of symmetric and asymmetric JPEG coding and camera separation. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 3, 95-109.
37. TAYLOR, M., AND CREELMAN, C. 1967. PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions. J. Acoustical Soc. America 41, 782.
38. TYLER, C. W. 1975. Spatial organization of binocular disparity sensitivity. Vision Res. 15, 5, 583-590.
39. WANG, Z., BOVIK, A. C., SHEIKH, H. R., AND SIMONCELLI, E. P. 2004. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image processing 13, 4, 600-612.
40. WANGER, L., FERWERDA, J., AND GREENBERG, D. 1992. Perceiving spatial relationships in computer-generated images. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 12, 3, 44-58.
41. WATSON, A. 1987. The Cortex transform: rapid computation of simulated neural images. Comp. Vision Graphics and Image Processing 39, 311-327. (Pubitemid 17655928)
42. WEYRICH, T., DENG, J., BARNES, C., RUSINKIEWICZ, S., AND FINKELSTEIN, A. 2007. Digital bas-relief from 3D scenes. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 26, 3, 32.
43. WILSON, H. 1980. A transducer function for threshold and suprathreshold human vision. Biological Cybernetics 38, 171-8. (Pubitemid 11208795)
44. WINKLER, S. 2005. Digital video quality: vision models and metrics. Wiley.