Skin rejuvenating effects of chemical peeling: A study in photoaged hairless mice

International Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1075-1082

  Han, Sung Hyup ^a   Kim, Hong Jig ^b   Kim, Si Yong ^c   Kim, You Chan ^d   Choi, Gwang Seong ^a   Shin, Jeong Hyun ^a  

^a Inha University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Ohkims Skin and Laser Clinic   (South Korea)

^c The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

^d Ajou University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN FIBER; PHENOL; TRICHLOROACETIC ACID;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL PEELING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DERMATOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; ELASTIC FIBER; EPIDERMIS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INFLAMMATORY CELL; INFLAMMATORY INFILTRATE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHOTOAGING; PUNCH BIOPSY; REJUVENATION; SKIN BIOPSY; SKIN CARE; SKIN REGENERATION; SKINFOLD THICKNESS; THERAPY EFFECT; TISSUE REGENERATION; TREATMENT DURATION; ULTRAVIOLET B RADIATION; WRINKLE;

ANIMALS; CHEMEXFOLIATION; COLLAGEN; ELASTIC TISSUE; MICE; MICE, HAIRLESS; PHENOL; REJUVENATION; SKIN; SKIN AGING; TRICHLOROACETIC ACID;

EID: 80051876261     PISSN: 00119059     EISSN: 13654632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04712.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kligman LH, Kligman AM. The nature of photoaging: its prevention and repair. Photodermatol 1986; 3: 215-227.
2. Montagna W, Kirchner S, Carlisle K. Histologic appearance of sun-damaged human skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 21: 907.
3. Yaar M, Eller MS, Gilchrest BA. Fifty years of skin aging. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc 2002; 7: 51-58.
4. Baker TJ, Gordon HL, Mosienko P, Seckinger DL. Longterm histological study of skin after chemical peeling. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974; 53: 522-525.
5. Dinner MI, Artz JS. The art of the trichloroacetic acid chemical peel. Clin Plast Surg 1998; 25: 53-62.
6. Stough DB III, Irwin WG. Chemical peel for facial wrinkles. Am Fam Physician 1974; 10: 106-108.
7. Wolfort FG, Dalton WE, Hoopes JE. Chemical peel with trichloracetic acid. Br J Plast Surg 1972; 25: 333-334.
8. Coleman WP III, Brody HJ. Advances in chemical peeling. Dermatol Clin 1997; 15: 19-26.
9. Brodland DG, Cullimore KC, Roenigk RK, Gibson LE. Depths of chemexfoliation induced by various concentrations and application techniques of trichloroacetic acid in a porcine model. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1989; 15: 967-971.
10. Behin F, Feuerstein SS, Marovitz WF. Comparative histological study of mini pig skin after chemical peel in an animal model after chemical peel and dermabrasion. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 271.
11. Vagotis FL, Brundage SR. Histologic study of dermabrasion and chemical peel in an animal model after pretreatment with Retin-A. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1995; 19: 243-246.
12. Nelson BR, Fader DJ, Gillard M, et al. Pilot histologic and ultrastructural study of the effects of medium-depth chemical facial peels on dermal collagen in patients with actinically damaged skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 32: 472-478.
13. El-Domyati MB, Attia SK, Saleh FY, et al. Trichloroacetic acid peeling versus dermabrasion: a histometric, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural comparison. Dermatol Surg 2004; 30: 179-188.
14. Butler PE, Gonzalez S, Randolph MA, et al. Quantitative and qualitative effects of chemical peeling on photoaged skin: an experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107: 222-228.
15. Kligman LH, Akin FJ, Kligman AM. Prevention of ultraviolet damage to the dermis of hairless mice by sunscreens. J Invest Dermatol 1982; 78: 181-189.
16. Lee CJ, Park JH, Ciesielski TE, et al. Retinoids, 585-nm laser, and carbon dioxide laser: a numeric comparison of neocollagen formation in photoaged hairless mouse skin. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008; 32: 894-901.
17. Sakuta T, Kanayama T. Marked improvement induced in photoaged skin of hairless mouse by ER36009, a novel RARgamma-specific retinoid, but not by ER35794, an RXR-selective agonist. Int J Dermatol 2006; 45: 1288-1295.
18. Kligman AM. Early destructive effects of sunlight on human skin. JAMA 1969; 210: 2377-2380.
19. Sams WM, Smith JG. The histochemistry of chronically sun-damaged skin. J Invest Dermatol 1961; 37: 447-452.
20. Kligman LH. The hairless mouse model for photoaging. Clin Dermatol 1996; 14: 183-195.
21. Massagué J. TGF-beta signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem 1998; 67: 753-791.
22. Kang S, Fisher GJ, Voorhees JJ. Photoaging and topical tretinoin: therapy, pathogenesis, and prevention. Arch Dermatol 1997; 133: 1280-1284.
23. Quan T, He T, Kang S, et al. Ultraviolet irradiation alters transforming growth factor beta/smad pathway in human skin in vivo. J Invest Dermatol 2002; 119: 499-506.
24. Fisher GJ, Datta SC, Talwar HS, et al. Molecular basis of sun-induced premature skin aging and retinoid antagonism. Nature 1996; 379: 335-339.
25. Burris LM, Roenigk HH. Chemical peels as a treatment for skin damage from excessive sun exposure. Dermatol Nurs 1997; 9: 99-104.
26. Collins PS. The chemical peel. Clin Dermatol 1987; 5: 57-74.
27. Brody HJ. Variation and complications in medium-depth chemical peeling. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1989; 15: 953-963.
28. Clark E, Scerri L. Superficial and medium-depth chemical peels. Clin Dermatol 2008; 26: 209-218.
29. Glogau RG, Matarasso SL. Chemical peels: trichloroacetic acid and phenol. Dermatol Clin 1995; 13: 263-276.
30. Landau M. Advances in deep chemical peels. Dermatol Nurs 2005; 17: 438-441.
31. Fulton JE, Porumb S. Chemical peels: their place within the range of resurfacing techniques. Am J Clin Dermatol 2004; 5: 179-187.