Using acellular porcine limbal stroma for rabbit limbal stem cell microenvironment reconstruction

Biomaterials

Volumn 32, Issue 31, 2011, Pages 7812-7821

  Huang, Minghai ^a   Li, Naiyang ^a   Wu, Zheng ^a   Wan, Pengxia ^a   Liang, Xuanwei ^a   Zhang, Wei ^a   Wang, Xiaoran ^a   Li, Chaoyang ^a   Xiao, Jianhui ^a   Zhou, Qiang ^a   Liu, Zhao ^a   Wang, Zhichong ^a  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Acellular limbal stroma; Immunogenicity; Limbal stem cell microenvironment; Limbal stroma reconstruction

Indexed keywords

ACELLULAR LIMBAL STROMA; CORNEAL OPACITY; CORNEAL STROMA; EPITHELIAL CELLS; FOUR-GROUP; GRAFT REJECTION; IMMUNE REJECTION; IMMUNOGENICITY; LIMBAL DEFECTS; LIMBAL STEM CELL MICROENVIRONMENT; LIMBAL STROMA RECONSTRUCTION; MICROENVIRONMENTS; POST-OPERATIVE DAYS;

GRAFTS;

STEM CELLS;

KI 67 ANTIGEN; PROTEIN P63;

ARTICLE; AUTOGRAFT; CELL INVASION; CORNEA OPACITY; CORNEA STROMA; CORNEA TRANSPLANTATION; EPITHELIUM BASAL CELL; EXPERIMENTAL PIG; EXPERIMENTAL RABBIT; FEASIBILITY STUDY; LIMBAL STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; MICROENVIRONMENT; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CD4-POSITIVE T-LYMPHOCYTES; CD8-POSITIVE T-LYMPHOCYTES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLULAR MICROENVIRONMENT; CORNEAL STROMA; CORNEAL TRANSPLANTATION; EPITHELIAL CELLS; EPITHELIUM, CORNEAL; FEMALE; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; GOBLET CELLS; KERATINS; KI-67 ANTIGEN; LIMBUS CORNEAE; MALE; MUCIN 5AC; PHENOTYPE; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RABBITS; STEM CELLS; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; SUS SCROFA; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS; SUS;

EID: 80051805745     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kiel M.J., Yilmaz O.H., Iwashita T., Yilmaz O.H., Terhorst C., Morrison S.J. SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell 2005, 7:1109-1121.
2. Lund A.W., Yener B., Stegemann J.P., Plopper G.E. The natural and engineered 3D microenvironment as a regulatory cue during stem cell fate determination. Tissue Eng B Rev 2009, 3:371-380.
3. Lavker R.M., Tseng S.C., Sun T.T. Corneal epithelial stem cells at he limbus: looking at some old problems from a new angle. Exp Eye Res 2004, 78:433-446.
4. Li W., Hayashida Y., Chen Y.T., Tseng S.C. Niche regulation of corneal epithelial stem cells at the limbus. Cell Res 2007, 17:26-36.
5. Townsend W.M. The limbal palisades of Vogt. Trans Am Opthalmol Soc 1991, 89:721-756.
6. Lavker R.M., Dong G., Cheng S.Z., Kudoh K., Cotsarelis G., Sun T.T. Relative proliferative rates of limbal and corneal epithelia. Implications of corneal epithelial migration, circadian rhythm, and suprabasally located DNA-synthesizing keratinocytes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991, 6:1864-1875.
7. Tseng S.C. Regulation and clinical implications of corneal epithelial stem cells. Mol Biol Rep 1996, 1:47-58.
8. Gomes J.A., dos Santos M.S., Cunha M.C., Mascaro V.L., Barros Jde N., de Sousa L.B. Amniotic membrane transplantation for partial and total limbal stem cell deficiency secondary to chemical burn. Ophthalmology 2003, 3:466-473.
9. Kheirkhah A., Casas V., Raju V.K., Tseng S.C. Sutureless amniotic membrane transplantation for partial limbal stem cell deficiency. Am J Ophthalmol 2008, 5:787-794.
10. Fukuda K., Chikama T., Nakamura M., Nishida T. Differential distribution of subchains of the basement membrane components type IV collagen and laminin among the amniotic membrane cornea and conjunctiva. Cornea 1999, 18:73-79.
11. Tsai R.J., Sun T.T., Tseng S.C. Comparison of limbal and conjunctival autograft transplantation on corneal surface reconstruction in rabbits. Ophthalmology 1990, 4:446-455.
12. Ozdemir O., Tekeli O., Ornek K., Arslanpençe A., Yalçindag N.F. Limbal autograft and allograft transplantations in patients with corneal burns. Eye 2004, 3:241-248.
13. Chen J.J., Tseng S.C. Corneal epithelial wound healing in partial limbal deficiency. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990, 7:1301-1314.
14. Basti S., Mathur U. Unusual intermediate-term outcome in three cases of limbal autograft transplantation. Ophthalmology 1999, 5:958-963.
15. Yiu S.C., Thomas P.B., Nguyen P. Ocular surface reconstruction: recent advances and future outlook. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2007, 6:509-514.
16. Dios E., Herreras J.M., Mayo A., Blanco G. Efficacy of systemic cyclosporine and amniotic membrane on rabbit conjunctival limbal allograft rejection. Cornea 2005, 2:182-188.
17. Gilbert T.W., Sellaro T.L., Badylak S.F. Decellularization of tissues and organs. Biomaterials 2006, 19:3675-3683.
18. Wu Z., Zhou Y., Li N., Huang M., Duan H., Ge J., et al. The use of phospholipase A(2) to prepare acellular porcine corneal stroma as a tissue engineering scaffold. Biomaterials 2009, 21:3513-3522.
19. Henderson T.R., McCall S.H., Taylor G.R., Noble B.A. Do transplanted corneal limbal stem cells survive in vivo long-term? Possible techniques to detect donor cell survival by polymerase chain reaction with the amelogenin gene and Y-specific probes. Eye 1997, 6:779-785.
20. Xiao Jianhui, Duan Hucheng, Liu Zhao, Wu Zheng, Lan Yuqing, Zhang Wei, et al. Construction of the recellularized corneal stroma using porous acellular corneal scaffold. Biomaterials 2011, 32:6962-6971.
21. Sellaro T.L., Ravindra A.K., Stolz D.B., Badylak S.F. Maintenance of hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cell phenotype in vitro using organ-specific extracellular matrix scaffolds. Tissue Eng 2007, 9:2301-2310.
22. Clark P., Connolly P., Curtis A.S., Dow J.A., Wilkinson C.D. Topographical control of cell behaviour. I. Simple step cues. Development 1987, 3:439-448.
23. den Braber E.T., de Ruijter J.E., Ginsel L.A., von Recum A.F., Jansen J.A. Quantitative analysis of fibroblast morphology on microgrooved surfaces with various groove and ridge dimensions. Biomaterials 1996, 21:2037-2044.
24. Ljubimov A.V., Burgeson R.E., Butkowski R.J., Michael A.F., Sun T.T., Kenney M.C. Human corneal basement membrane heterogeneity topographical differences in the expression of type IV collagen and laminin isoforms. Lab Invest 1995, 72:461-473.
25. Wessel H., Anderson S., Fite D., Halvas E., Hempel J., Sundar Raj N. Type XII collagen contributes to diversities in human corneal and limbal extracellular matrices. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997, 38:2408-2422.
26. Schlotzer-Schrehardt U., Dietrich T., Saito K., Sorokin L., Sasaki T., Paulsson M., et al. Characterization of extracellular matrix components in the limbal epithelial stem cell compartment. Exp Eye Res 2007, 6:845-860.
27. Espana E.M., Kawakita T., Romano A., Di Pascuale M., Smiddy R., Liu C.Y., et al. Stromal niche controls the plasticity of limbal and corneal epithelial differentiation in a rabbit model of recombined tissue. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003, 12:5130-5135.
28. Chen Z., de Paiva C.S., Luo L., Kretzer F.L., Pflugfelder S.C., Li D.Q. Characterization of putative stem cell phenotype in human limbal epithelia. Stem Cells 2004, 3:355-366.
29. Ross J.R., Howell D.N., Sanfilippo F.P. Characteristics of corneal xenograft rejection in a discordant species combination. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993, 8:2469-2476.
30. Wang Z., Ge J., Xu J., Chen J. Relative quantitative analysis of corneal immunogenicity. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2002, 9:535-538.