Fast 3D reconstruction of the spine from biplanar radiographs using a deformable articulated model

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 924-933

  Moura, Daniel C ^a,b   Boisvert, Jonathan ^c,d   Barbosa, Jorge G ^a,c   Labelle, Hubert ^e   Tavares, João Manuel R S ^a,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^b Laboratório de Inteligência Artificial e de Ciência de Computadores   (Portugal)

^c NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

^d ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

3D reconstruction; Optimisation; Scoliosis; Spine; Statistical shape models; X ray imaging

Indexed keywords

3D RECONSTRUCTION; OPTIMISATIONS; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE; STATISTICAL SHAPE MODEL; XRAY IMAGING;

RADIOGRAPHY;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL MODEL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION STUDY; VERTEBRA BODY;

HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE; TIME FACTORS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 80051804205     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: 18734030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Stokes I.A. Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. a report presented to the scoliosis research society by the scoliosis research society working group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity. Spine 1994, 19(2):236-248.
2. Yazici M., Acaroglu E., Alanay A., Deviren V., Cila A., Surat A. Measurement of vertebral rotation in standing versus supine position in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediat Orthopaed 2001, 21(2):252-256.
3. Levy A., Goldberg M., Mayo N., Hanley J., Poitras B. Reducing the lifetime risk of cancer from spinal radiographs among people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1996, 21(13):1540-1547.
4. Dansereau J., Stokes I. Measurements of the three-dimensional shape of the rib cage. J Biomech 1988, 21(11):893-901.
5. Dumas R., Mitton D., Laporte S., Dubousset J., Steib J.P., Lavaste F,., et al. Explicit calibration method and specific device designed for stereoradiography. J Biomech 2003, 36(6):827-834.
6. Kadoury S., Cheriet F., Laporte C., Labelle H. A versatile 3D reconstruction system of the spine and pelvis for clinical assessment of spinal deformities. Med Biol Eng Comput 2007, 45(6):591-602.
7. Cheriet F., Laporte C., Kadoury S., Labelle H., Dansereau J. A novel system for the 3-D reconstruction of the human spine and rib cage from biplanar X-ray images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007, 54(7):1356-1358.
8. Moura D.C., Barbosa J.G., Reis A.M., Tavares J.M.R.S. A flexible approach for the calibration of biplanar radiography of the spine on conventional radiological systems. Comput Model Eng Sci 2010, 60(2):115-138.
9. Labelle H., Dansereau J., Bellefleur C., Poitras B. Three-dimensional effect of the boston brace on the thoracic spine and rib cage. Spine 1996, 21(1):59-64.
10. Labelle H,., et al. Comparison between preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional reconstructions of idiopathic scoliosis with the cotrel-dubousset procedure. Spine 1995, 20(23):2487-2492.
11. Villemure I., Aubin C., Grimard G., Dansereau J., Labelle H. Progression of vertebral and spinal three-dimensional deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a longitudinal study. Spine 2001, 26(20):2244-2250.
12. Labelle H., Bellefleur C., Joncas J., Aubin C., Cheriet F. Preliminary evaluation of a computer-assisted tool for the design and adjustment of braces in idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective and randomized study. Spine 2007, 32(8):835-843.
13. Aubin C.E., Descrimes J.L., Dansereau J., Skalli W., Lavaste F., Labelle H. Geometrical modelling of the spine and thorax for biomechanical analysis of scoliotic deformities using finite element method. Ann Chir 1995, 49(8):749-761.
14. Aubin C., Dansereau J., Parent F., Labelle H., de Guise J.A. Morphometric evaluations of personalised 3D reconstructions and geometric models of the human spine. Med Biol Eng Comput 1997, 35(6):611-618.
15. Delorme S., Petit Y., de Guise J., Labelle H., Aubin C.E., Dansereau J. Assessment of the 3-D reconstruction and high-resolution geometrical modeling of the human skeletal trunk from 2-D radiographic images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003, 50(8):989-998.
16. Labelle H., Dansereau J., Bellefleur C., Jéquier J. Variability of geometric measurements from three-dimensional reconstructions of scoliotic spines and rib cages. Eur Spine J 1995, 4(2):88-94.
17. Trochu F. A contouring program based on dual kriging interpolation. Eng Comput 1993, 9(3):160-177.
18. Mitton D., Landry C., Vron S., Skalli W., Lavaste F., De Guise J. 3D reconstruction method from biplanar radiography using non-stereocorresponding points and elastic deformable meshes. Med Biol Eng Comput 2000, 38(2):133-139.
19. Mitulescu A., Semaan I., De Guise J., Leborgne P., Adamsbaum C., Skalli W. Validation of the non-stereo corresponding points stereoradiographic 3D reconstruction technique. Med Biol Eng Comput 2001, 39(2):152-158.
20. Mitulescu A., Skalli W., Mitton D., De Guise J. Three-dimensional surface rendering reconstruction of scoliotic vertebrae using a non stereo-corresponding points technique. Eur Spine J 2002, 11(4):344-352.
21. Bras A.L., Laporte S., Mitton D., de Guise J.A., Skalli W. Three-dimensional (3D) detailed reconstruction of human vertebrae from low-dose digital stereoradiography. Eur J Orthopaed Surg Traumatol 2003, 13(2):57-62.
22. Pomero V., Mitton D., Laporte S., de Guise J.A., Skalli W. Fast accurate stereoradiographic 3D-reconstruction of the spine using a combined geometric and statistic model. Clin Biomech 2004, 19(3):240-247.
23. Benameur S., Mignotte M., Parent S., Labelle H., Skalli W., de Guise J. 3D/2D registration and segmentation of scoliotic vertebrae using statistical models. Comput Med Imaging Graphics 2003, 27(5):321-337.
24. Benameur S., Mignotte M., Labelle H., Guise J.A.D. A hierarchical statistical modeling approach for the unsupervised 3-D biplanar reconstruction of the scoliotic spine. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005, 52(12):2041-2057.
25. Dumas R., Blanchard B., Carlier R., de Loubresse C., Le Huec J., Marty C,., et al. A semi-automated method using interpolation and optimisation for the 3D reconstruction of the spine from bi-planar radiography: a precision and accuracy study. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008, 46(1):85-92.
26. Humbert L., Guise J.D., Aubert B., Godbout B., Skalli W. 3D reconstruction of the spine from biplanar X-rays using parametric models based on transversal and longitudinal inferences. Med Eng Phys 2009, 31(6):681-687.
27. Vaiton M., Dansereau J., Grimard G., Beauséjour M., Labelle H., de Guise J. Évaluation d'une méthode clinique d'acquisition rapide de la géométrie 3D de colonnes vertébrales scoliotiques. ITBM-RBM 2004, 25(3):150-162.
28. Kadoury S., Cheriet F., Labelle H. Personalized x-ray 3D reconstruction of the scoliotic spine from hybrid statistical and image-based models. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009, 28(9):1422-1435.
29. Roweis S., Saul L. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science 2000, 290(5500):2323-2326.
30. Boisvert J., Cheriet F., Pennec X., Labelle H., Ayache N. Geometric variability of the scoliotic spine using statistics on articulated shape models. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2008, 27(4):557-568.
31. Boisvert J., Cheriet F., Pennec X., Labelle H., Ayache N. Articulated spine models for 3-D reconstruction from partial radiographic data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2008, 55(11):2565-2574.
32. Boisvert J., Cheriet F., Pennec X., Ayache N. 3D reconstruction of the human spine from radiograph(s) using a multi-body statistical model. Prog Biomed Opt Imaging 2009, 10(37).
33. Fritsch F., Carlson R. Monotone piecewise cubic interpolation. SIAM J Numer Anal 1980, 17(2):238-246.
34. Pennec X. Intrinsic statistics on Riemannian manifolds: Basic tools for geometric measurements. J Math Imaging Vision 2006, 25(1):127-154.
35. Jolliffe I. Principal component analysis 2002, Springer Verlag, New York. 2nd ed.
36. Moura D.C., Boisvert J., Barbosa J.G., Tavares J.M.R.S. Fast 3D reconstruction of the spine using user-defined splines and a statistical articulated model. Advances in visual computing; vol. 5875 of LNCS. 2009, 586-595.
37. Coleman T.F., Li Y. An interior trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. SIAM J Optim 1996, 6(2):418-445.
38. Lourakis M., Argyros A. Is Levenberg-Marquardt the most efficient optimization algorithm for implementing bundle adjustment?. IEEE international conference on computer vision, vol. 2 2005, 1526-1531.
39. Maesschalck R.D., Jouan-Rimbaud D., Massart D.L. The Mahalanobis distance. Chemometrics Intel Lab Systems 2000, 50(1):1-18.
40. van der Maaten L., Postma E., van den Herik J. Dimensionality reduction: a comparative review. J Mach Learn Res 2009, 10:1-41.
41. Dumas R., Le Bras A., Champain N., Savidan M., Mitton D., Kalifa G,., et al. Validation of the relative 3D orientation of vertebrae reconstructed by bi-planar radiography. Med Eng Phys 2004, 26(5):415-422.
42. Dubousset J., Charpak G., Dorion I., Skalli W., Lavaste F., Deguise J,., et al. A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculoskeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: the eos system. Bull l'Acad Natl Méd 2005, 189(2):287-297.