Soluble microbial products and their implications in mixed culture biotechnology

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 29, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 454-463

  Ni, Bing Jie ^a   Rittmann, Bruce E ^b   Yu, Han Qing ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC SYSTEMS; EFFLUENT QUALITY; HETEROTROPHS; MATHEMATICAL MODELING; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; MIXED CULTURES; SOLUBLE MICROBIAL PRODUCTS; SOLUBLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

BIODEGRADATION; BIOREACTORS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; MEMBRANE FOULING; QUALITY CONTROL; WATER QUALITY;

EFFLUENTS;

BIOMASS ASSOCIATED PRODUCT; ORGANIC COMPOUND; SOLUBLE MICROBIAL PRODUCT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UTILIZATION ASSOCIATED PRODUCT;

AUTOTROPH; BIODEGRADABILITY; BIOMASS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; EFFLUENT; ENZYME MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; HETEROTROPH; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; OXIDATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR;

BACTERIA; BIOFILMS; BIOFOULING; BIOMASS; BIOREACTORS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SEWAGE; SOLUBILITY;

EID: 80051799387     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.04.006     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Laspidou C.D., Rittmann B.E. A unified theory for extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass. Water Res. 2002, 36:2711-2720.
2. Barker D.J., Stuckey D.C. A review of soluble microbial products (SMP) in wastewater treatment systems. Water Res. 1999, 33:3063-3082.
3. de Silva D.G.V., Rittmann B.E. Interpreting the response to loading changes in a mixed-culture completely stirred tank reactor. Water Environ. Res. 2000, 72:566-573.
4. de Silva D.G.V., Rittmann B.E. Nonsteady-state modeling of multispecies activated-sludge processes. Water Environ. Res. 2000, 72:554-565.
5. Aquino S.F., Stuckey D.C. Soluble microbial product formation in anaerobic chemostats in the presence of toxic compounds. Water Res. 2004, 38:255-266.
6. Jarusutthirak C., et al. Fouling characteristics of wastewater effluent organic matter (EfOM) isolates on NF and UF membranes. Desalination 2005, 145:247-255.
7. Rosenberger S., et al. Impact of colloidal and soluble organic material on membrane performance in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2006, 40:710-719.
8. Labbs C., et al. Understanding the size and character of fouling-causing substances from effluent organic matter (EfOM) in low-pressure membrane filtration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:4495-4499.
9. Holakoo L., et al. Chelating properties and molecular weight distribution of soluble microbial products from an aerobic membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 2006, 40:1531-1538.
10. Ichihashi O., et al. Effect of soluble microbial products on microbial metabolisms related to nutrient removal. Water Res. 2006, 40:1627-1633.
11. Magbanua B.S., Bowers A.R. Characterization of soluble microbial products (SMP) derived from glucose and phenol in dual substrate activated sludge bioreactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 93:862-870.
12. Judd S. The status of membrane bioreactor technology. Trends Biotechnol. 2008, 26:109-116.
13. Meng F., et al. Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res. 2009, 43:1489-1512.
14. Kiser M.A., et al. Quantitatively understanding the performance of membrane bioreactors. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2010, 45:1003-1013.
15. Laspidou C.S., Rittmann B.E. Non-steady state modeling of extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass. Water Res. 2002, 36:1983-1992.
16. Noguera D.R., et al. Soluble microbial products in anaerobic chemostates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1994, 44:1040-1047.
17. Aquino S.F., Stuckey D.C. Integrated model of the production of soluble microbial products (SMP) and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in anaerobic chemostats during transient conditions. Biochem. Eng. J. 2008, 38:138-146.
18. Namkung E., Rittmann B.E. Soluble microbial products (SMP) formation kinetics by biofilms. Water Res. 1986, 20:795-806.
19. Jiang T., et al. Modelling the production and degradation of soluble microbial products (SMP) in membrane bioreactors (MBR). Water Res. 2008, 42:4955-4964.
20. Ni B.J., et al. Fractionating soluble microbial products in the activated sludge process. Water Res. 2010, 44:2292-2302.
21. Jarusutthirak C., Amy G. Role of soluble microbial products (SMP) in membrane fouling and flux decline. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:969-974.
22. Jarusutthirak C., Amy G. Understanding soluble microbial products (SMP) as a component of effluent organic matter (EfOM). Water Res. 2007, 41:2787-2793.
23. Jiang T., et al. Characterization of soluble microbial products and their fouling impacts in membrane bioreactors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:6642-6648.
24. Rittmann B.E., McCarty P.L. Environmental Biotechnology: Principles and Applications 2001, McGraw-Hill.
25. Ni B.J., et al. Modeling microbial products in activated sludge under feast-famine conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:2489-2497.
26. Ni B.J., et al. Long-term formation of microbial products in a sequencing batch reactor. Water Res. 2010, 44:3787-3796.
27. Kindaichi T., et al. Ecophysiological interaction between nitrifying bacteria and heterotrophic bacteria in autotrophic nitrifying biofilms as determined by microautoradiography-fluorescence in situ hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70:1641-1650.
28. Pynaert K., et al. Start-up of autotrophic nitrogen removal reactors via sequential biocatalyst addition. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38:1228-1235.
29. 14C-labeled microbial products derived from nitrifying bacteria in autotrophic nitrifying biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71:3987-3994.
30. Vadivelu M.V., et al. Stoichiometric and kinetic characterization of Nitrobacter in mixed culture by decoupling the growth and energy generation processes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 94:1176-1188.
31. Ni B.J., et al. Growth, maintenance and product formation of autotrophs in activated sludge: Taking the nitrite-oxidizing bacteria as an example. Water Res. 2008, 42:4261-4270.
32. Matsumoto S., et al. Microbial community structure in autotrophic nitrifying granules characterized by experimental and simulation analyses. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12:192-206.
33. Rittmann B.E., et al. The transient-state: multiple-species biofilm model for biofiltration processes. Water Res. 2002, 36:2342-2356.
34. Merkey B.V., et al. Modeling how soluble microbial products (SMP) support heterotrophic bacteria in autotroph-based biofilms. J. Theor. Biol. 2009, 259:670-683.
35. Dong B., Jiang S.Y. Characteristics and behaviors of soluble microbial products in sequencing batch membrane bioreactors at various sludge retention times. Desalination 2009, 243:240-250.
36. Liang S., et al. Soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactor operation: behaviors, characteristics, and fouling potential. Water Res. 2007, 41:95-101.
37. Fonseca A.C., et al. Extra-cellular polysaccharides, soluble microbial products, and natural organic matter impact on nanofiltration membranes flux decline. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:2491-2497.
38. Jermann D., et al. Mutual influences between natural organic matter and inorganic particles and their combined effect on ultrafiltration membrane fouling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:9129-9136.
39. Meng F., et al. Occurrence, source, and fate of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:8821-8826.
40. Oppenheimer J., et al. Investigation of Membrane Bioreactor Effluent Water Quality and Technology 2010, Water Reuse Foundation, Alexandria.
41. Drews A., et al. Does fouling in MBRs depend on SMP?. Desalination 2008, 231:141-149.
42. Lee Y., et al. Modeling of submerged membrane bioreactor process for wastewater treatment. Desalination 2002, 146:451-457.
43. Jeong T.-Y., Cha G.-C., Yoo I.-K., Kim D.-J. Characteristics of bio-fouling in a submerged MBR. Desalination 2007, 207:107-113.
44. Kraume M., et al. Fouling in MBR: what use are lab investigations for full scale operation?. Desalination 2009, 236:94-103.
45. Ng K.K., et al. The effect of soluble microbial products on membrane fouling in a fixed carrier biological system. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 72:98-104.
46. Al-Halbouni D., et al. Correlation of EPS content in activated sludge at different sludge retention times with membrane fouling phenomena. Water Res. 2008, 42:1475-1488.
47. Eusebio R.C., et al. Significant role of membrane fouling and microbial community on the performance of membrane bioreactor (MBR) system. Desalination Water Treat. 2010, 17:90-98.
48. Menniti A., Morgenroth E. The influence of aeration intensity on predation and EPS production in membrane bioreactors. Water Res. 2010, 44:2541-2553.
49. Geng Z., Hall E.R. A comparative study of fouling-related properties of sludge from conventional and membrane enhanced biological phosphorus removal processes. Water Res. 2007, 41:4329-4338.
50. Yigit N.O., et al. Membrane fouling in a pilot-scale submerged membrane bioreactor operated under various conditions. Desalination 2008, 231:124-132.
51. Aquino S.F., Stuckey D.C. Chromatographic characterization of dissolved organics in effluents from two anaerobic reactors treating synthetic wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 54:193-198.
52. Berube P.R., et al. Parameters governing permeate flux in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating low-strength municipal wastewaters: a literature review. Water Environ. Res. 2006, 78:887-896.
53. Aquino S.F., et al. Characterization of dissolved compounds in submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (SAMBRs). J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 81:1894-1904.
54. Lin H.J., et al. Sludge properties and their effects on membrane fouling in submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (SAnMBRs). Water Res. 2009, 43:3827-3837.
55. Pan J.R., et al. Characteristics of soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactor and its effect on membrane fouling. Desalination 2010, 250:778-780.
56. Ng H.Y., et al. Membrane fouling of submerged membrane bioreactors: Impact of mean cell residence time and the contributing factors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:2706-2713.
57. Drews A., et al. Influence of unsteady membrane bioreactor operation on EPS formation and filtration resistance. Desalination 2006, 192:1-9.
58. Reid E., et al. Sludge characteristics and membrane fouling in full-scale submerged membrane bioreactors. Desalination 2008, 219:240-249.
59. Wang X.M., Waite T.D. Role of gelling soluble and colloidal microbial products in membrane fouling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:9341-9347.
60. Mishima I., Nakajima J. Control of membrane fouling in membrane bioreactor process by coagulant addition. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59:1255-1262.
61. Drews A., et al. Impact of ambient conditions on SMP elimination and rejection in MBRs. Water Res. 2007, 41:3850-3858.
62. Jarusutthirak C., et al. Fouling characteristics of wastewater effluent organic matter (EfOM) isolates on NF and UF membranes. Desalination 2002, 145:247-255.
63. Schiener P., et al. Production of soluble microbial products (SMP) in an anaerobic baffled reactor: composition, biodegradability and the effect of process parameters. Environ. Technol. 1998, 19:391-400.
64. Barker D.J., et al. Characterisation of soluble residual chemical oxygen demand (COD) in anaerobic wastewater treatment effluents. Water Res. 1999, 33:2499-2510.
65. Hu A.Y., Stuckey D.C. Treatment of dilute wastewaters using a novel submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor. J. Environ. Eng. ASCE 2006, 132:190-198.
66. Lee H.S., Rittmann B.E. Evaluation of metabolism using stoichiometry in fermentative biohydrogen. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 102:749-758.
67. Mesquita P.L., et al. Soluble microbial product (SMP) characterization in bench-scale aerobic and anaerobic CSTRs under different operational conditions. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 27:101-111.
68. Barker D.J., Stuckey D.C. Modeling of soluble microbial products in anaerobic digestion: the effect of feed strength and composition. Water Environ. Res. 2001, 73:173-184.
69. Kuo W.C., et al. Formation of soluble microbial products during anaerobic treatment. Water Environ. Res. 1996, 68:279-285.
70. Barker D.J., et al. Soluble microbial products in ABR treating low-strength wastewater. J. Environ. Eng. ASCE 2000, 126:239-249.
71. Aquino S.F., Stuckey D.C. Production of soluble microbial products (SMP) in anaerobic chemostats under nutrient deficiency. J. Environ. Eng. ASCE 2003, 129:1007-1014.
72. Kuo W.C., Parkin G.F. Characterization of soluble microbial products from anaerobic treatment by molecular weight distribution and nickel-chelating properties. Water Res. 1996, 30:915-922.
73. Nogueira R., et al. Evaluating heterotrophic growth in a nitrifying biofilm reactor using fluorescence in situ hybridization and mathematical modeling. Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 52:135-141.
74. Zhu H.T., et al. Membrane organic fouling and the effect of pre-ozonation in microfiltration of secondary effluent organic matter. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 352:213-221.
75. de Silva D.G.V., et al. Advanced analysis of membrane-bioreactor performance with aerobic-anoxic cycling. Water Sci. Technol. 1998, 38:505-512.
76. Vyrides I., et al. Post-treatment of a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) saline effluent using powdered activated carbon (PAC). J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177:836-841.
77. Arabi S., Nakhla G. Impact of molecular weight distribution of soluble microbial products on fouling in membrane bioreactors. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 73:391-396.
78. Jang N., et al. Steady-state modeling of bio-fouling potentials with respect to the biological kinetics in the submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR). J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:352-360.
79. Schwarz A., et al. A critical review of the effects of mixed liquor suspended solids on membrane bioreactor operation. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2006, 41:1489-1511.