Retrospective multicenter evaluation of tapered implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface at 1 to 4 years of function

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 280-284

  Bae, Min Su ^a   Sohn, Dong Seok ^a   Ahn, Mi Ra ^a   Lee, Hyun Woo ^b   Jung, Heui Seung ^b   Shin, Im Hee ^a  

^a Catholic University of Daegu   (South Korea)

^b Private Practice   (South Korea)

Author keywords

implant failure; implant survival rate; retrospective multicenter analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; EDENTULOUSNESS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, TEMPORARY; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80051783745     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318218123b     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Moberg LE, Kö ndell PA, Sagulin GB, et al. Brånemark System and ITI Dental Implant System for treatment of mandibular edentulism. A comparative randomized study: 3-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:450-461.
2. Friberg B, Dahlin C, Widmark G, et al. One-year results of a prospective multicenter study on Brånemark System implants with a TiUnite surface. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7:70-75.
3. Weber HP, Crohin CC, Fiorellini JP. A 5-year prospective clinical and radiographic study of non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11: 144-153.
4. Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, et al. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. I: Clinical and radiographic results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:699-706.
5. Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Etienne D, et al. A prospective multicenter evaluation of 1,583 3i implants: 1-to 5-year data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17: 820-828.
6. Davarpanah M, Caraman M, Szmukler-Moncler S, et al. Preliminary data of a prospective clinical study on the Osseotite NT implant: 18-month follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20: 448-454. (Pubitemid 40905501)
7. Arvidson K, Bystedt H, Frykholm A, et al. Five-year prospective follow-up report of the Astra Tech Dental Implant System in the treatment of edentulous mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9:225-234. (Pubitemid 128657995)
8. Rasmusson L, Roos J, Bystedt H. A 10-year follow-up study of titanium dioxide-blasted implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7:36-42. (Pubitemid 40445861)
9. Peled M, Ardekian L, Tagger-Green N, et al. Dental implants in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A clinical study. Implant Dent. 2003;12:116-122.
10. Bratu EA, Tandlich M, Shapira L. A rough surface implant neck with microthreads reduces the amount of marginal bone loss: A prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:827-832.
11. Buser D, Weber HP, Bragger U, et al. Tissue integration of one-stage ITI implants: 3-year results of a longitudinal study with Hollow-Cylinder and Hollow-Screw implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:405-412.
12. Bahat O. Treatment planning and placement of implants in the posterior maxillae: Report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:151-161.
13. Sohn DS, Lee JS, Ahn MR, et al. New bone formation in the maxillary sinus without bone grafts. Implant Dent. 2008; 17:321-331.
14. Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, et al. Osseointegrated oral implants. A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol. 1988;59:287-296.
15. Garlini G, Bianchi C, Chierichetti V, et al. Retrospective clinical study of Osseotite implants: Zero-to 5-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:589-593. (Pubitemid 37162395)
16. Chiapasco M, Ronchi P. Sinus lift and endosseous implants-preliminary surgical and prosthetic results. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1994;3: 15-21.
17. Zinner ID, Small SA. Sinus-lift graft: Using the maxillary sinuses to support implants. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127:51-57. (Pubitemid 126432953)
18. Khoury F. Augmentation of the sinus floor with mandibular bone block and simultaneous implantation: A 6-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:557-564.
19. Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:49-70.
20. Simion M, Jovanovic SA, Tinti C, et al. Long-term evaluation of osseointegrated implants inserted at the time or after vertical ridge augmentation. A retrospective study on 123 implants with 1-5 year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12: 35-45. (Pubitemid 33723211)
21. Urban IA, Jovanovic SA, Lozada JL. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: A retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:502-510.
22. Schwartz-Arad D, Chaushu G. Placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: 4 to 7 years retrospective evaluation of 95 immediate implants. J Periodontol. 1997;68:1110-1116. (Pubitemid 127513678)
23. Polizzi G, Grunder U, Goene R, et al. Immediate and delayed implant placement into extraction sockets: A 5-year report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2: 93-99.
24. Grunder U, Polizzi G, Goené R, et al. A 3-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on the immediate and delayed-immediate placement of implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14: 210-216.
25. Crespi R, Capparé P, Gherlone E, et al. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets in the maxillary esthetic zone: A clinical comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:753-758.
26. Drago CJ, Del Castillo RA. A retrospective analysis of osseotite NT implants in clinical practice: 1-year follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006;26: 337-345. (Pubitemid 44220378)
27. Khayat PG, Milliez SN. Prospective clinical evaluation of 835 multithreaded tapered screw-vent implants: Results after two years of functional loading. J Oral Implantol. 2007;33:225-231.
28. Alves CC, Neves M. Tapered implants: From indications to advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009; 29:161-167.
29. O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:474-480. (Pubitemid 40115775)
30. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52:155-170. (Pubitemid 11157048)
31. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, et al. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10:387-416. (Pubitemid 12014507)
32. Lioubavina-Hack N, Lang NP, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:244-250. (Pubitemid 43709390)
33. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, et al. A human histologic analysis of osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999;19:117-129.
34. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, et al. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:889-902.
35. Roccuzzo M, Wilson T. A prospective study evaluating a protocol for 6 weeks' loading of SLA implants in the posterior maxilla: One year results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:502-507. (Pubitemid 41713076)
36. Bornstein MM, Lussi A, Schmid B, et al. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:659-666. (Pubitemid 37281812)
37. Nelson K, Semper W, Hildebrand D, et al. A retrospective analysis of sandblasted, acid-etched implants with reduced healing times with an observation period of up to 5 years. Int J Oral MaxillofacImplants. 2008;23:726-732.