Optical and electromagnetic tracking for navigated surgery of the sinuses and frontal skull base

Rhinology

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2011, Pages

  Kral, F ^a   Puschban, E J ^a   Riechelmann, H ^a   Pedross, F ^a   Freysinger, W ^a  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

Author keywords

CAS; Navigation; Skull base; Tracking

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OPTICS; SKULL BASE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ELECTROMAGNETIC PHENOMENA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; OPTICS AND PHOTONICS; SKULL BASE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 80051771415     PISSN: 03000729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4193/Rhino10.177     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Birkfellner W, Watzinger F, Wanschitz F, Enislidis G, Kollmann C, Rafolt D, et al. Systematic distortions in magnetic position digitizers. Med Phys. 1998; 25: 2242-2248.
2. Schicho K, Figl M, Donat M, et al. Stability of miniature electromagnetic tracking systems. Phys Med Biol. 2005; 50: 2089-2098.
3. Graydon AJ, Malak S, Anderson IA, Pitto RP. Evaluation of accuracy of an electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2009; 33: 975-979.
4. Fitzpatrick JM, West JB, Maurer CR, Jr. Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17: 694-702.
5. Labadie RF, Davis BM, Fitzpatrick JM. Image-guided surgery: what is the accuracy? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 13: 27-31.
6. Zheng G, Caversaccio M, Bachler R, Langlotz F, Nolte LP, Hausler R. Frameless optical computer-aided tracking of a microscope for otorhinology and skull base surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001; 127: 1233-1238.
7. Udupa JK, Herman GT. 3D Imaging in Medicine. 2 ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; 2000.
8. Fitzpatrick JM, West JB. The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001; 20: 917-927.
9. Knott PD, Batra PS, Butler RS, Citardi MJ. Contour and paired-point registration in a model for image-guided surgery. Laryngoscope. 2006; 116: 1877-1881.
10. West JB, Fitzpatrick JM, Toms SA, Maurer CR, Jr., Maciunas RJ. Fiducial point placement and the accuracy of point-based, rigid body registration. Neurosurg. 2001; 48: 810-816.
11. Caversaccio M, Freysinger W. Computer assistance for intraop-erative navigation in ENT surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2003; 12: 36-51.
12. Li Q, Zamorano L, Jiang Z, et al. Effect of Optical Digitizer Selection on the Application Accuracy of a Surgical Localization System-A Quantitative Comparison between the OPTOTRAK and FlashPoint Tracking Systems. Comput Aided Surg. 1999; 4: 314-321.
13. Chassat F, Lavallée S. Experimental Protocol of Accuracy Evaluation of 6-D Localizers for Computer-Integrated Surgery: Application to Four Optical Localizers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1998 p. 277-284.
14. Milne AD, Chess DG, Johnson JA, King GJ. Accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking device: a study of the optimal range and metal interference. J Biomech. 1996; 29: 791-793.
15. Reinhardt H, Trippel M, Westermann B, Gratzl O. Computer aided surgery with special focus on neuronavigation. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1999; 23: 237-244.
16. Frantz DD, Wiles AD, Leis SE, Kirsch SR. Accuracy assessment protocols for electromagnetic tracking systems. Phys Med Biol. 2003; 48: 2241-2251.
17. Santanam L, Noel C, Willoughby TR, et al. Quality assurance for clinical implementation of an electromagnetic tracking system. Med Phys. 2009; 36: 3477-3486.
18. Hummel J, Figl M, Birkfellner W, et al. Evaluation of a new electromagnetic tracking system using a standardized assessment protocol. Phys Med Biol. 2006; 51: N205-N210.
19. Yaniv Z, Wilson E, Lindisch D, Cleary K. Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment. Med Phys. 2009; 36: 876-892.
20. Hardy SM, Melroy C, White DR, Dubin M, Senior B. A comparison of computer-aided surgery registration methods for endo-scopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol. 2006; 20: 48-52.
21. Labadie RF, Shah RJ, Harris SS, et al. In vitro assessment of image-guided otologic surgery: submillimeter accuracy within the region of the temporal bone. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 132: 435-442.
22. Kral F, Riechelmann H, Freysinger W. Navigated surgery at the lateral skull base is strongly influenced by registration and preop-erative imagery. Laboratory results. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 137: 144-150.