What precedes which: Developmental neural tuning in face-and place-related cortex

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1963-1980

  Scherf, K Suzanne ^a   Luna, Beatriz ^a,b   Avidan, Galia ^c   Behrmann, Marlene ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

adolescent; fMRI; fusiform gyrus; parahippocampal gyrus; visual processing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CHILD; FACE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUSIFORM GYRUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL PLACE AREA; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; REGION OF INTEREST; SCHOOL CHILD; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; AGING; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CHILD; FACE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LINEAR MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOTION PICTURES AS TOPIC; ORIENTATION; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PATHWAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051768026     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhq269     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Aminoff E, Gronau N, Bar M. 2007. The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations. Cereb Cortex. 177:1493-1503.
2. Anastasi J, Rhodes MG. 2005. An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults. Psychon Bull Rev. 12:1043-1047. (Pubitemid 43751206)
3. Andrews TJ, Clarke A, Pell P, Hartley T. 2010. Selectivity for low-level features of objects in the human ventral stream. Neuroimage. 49:703-711.
4. Andrews TJ, Davies-Thompson J, Kingstone A, Young AW. 2010. Internal and external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective regions of visual cortex. J Neurosci. 30:3544-3552.
5. Andrews TJ, Ewbank MP. 2004. Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe. Neuroimage. 23:905-913. (Pubitemid 39446524)
6. Avidan G, Behrmann M. 2008. Implicit familiarity processing in congenital prosopagnosia. J Neuropsychol. 2:41-164.
7. Avidan G, Hasson U, Hendler T, Zohary E, Malach R. 2002. Analysis of the neuronal selectivity underlying low fMRI signals. Curr Biol. 12:964-972. (Pubitemid 34703326)
8. Avidan G, Hasson U, Malach R, Behrmann M. 2005. Detailed exploration of face-related processing in congenital prosopagnosia: 2 functional neuroimaging findings. J Cogn Neurosci. 17:1150-1167. (Pubitemid 41045584)
9. Aylward EH, Park JE, Field KM, Parsons AC, Richards TL, Cramer SC, Meltzoff AN. 2005. Brain activation during face perception: evidence of a developmental change. J Cogn Neurosci. 17:308-319. (Pubitemid 40194711)
10. Baker CI, Hutchison TL, Kanwisher N. 2007. Does the fusiform face area contain subregions highly selective for nonfaces? Nat Neurosci. 10:3-4. (Pubitemid 46026515)
11. Burgund ED, Kang HC, Kelly JE, Buckner RL, Snyder AZ, Petersen SE, et al. 2002. The feasibility of a common stereotactic space for children and adults in fMRI studies of development. Neuroimage. 17:184-200.
12. Carey S, Diamond R. 1977. From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. Science. 195:312-314. (Pubitemid 8015342)
13. Carey S, Diamond R, Woods B. 1980 Development of face recognition: a maturational component? Dev Psychol. 16:257-269.
14. Carver LJ, Dawson G, Panagiotides H, Meltzoff AN, McPartland J, Gray J, Munson J. 2003. Age-related differences in neural correlates of face recognition during the toddler and preschool years. Dev Psychobiol. 42:148-159. (Pubitemid 36227926)
15. Chung MS. 1997. Face recognition: effects of age of subjects and age of stimulus faces. Korea J Dev Psychol. 10:167-176.
16. Cohen Kadosh K, Henson RNA, Cohen Kadosh R, Johnson MH, Dick F. 2009. Task-dependent activation of face-sensitive cortex: an fMRI adaptation study. J Cogn Neurosci. 22:903-917.
17. Crookes K, McKone E. 2009. Early maturity of face recognition: no childhood development of holistic processing, novel face encoding, or face-space. Cognition. 111:219-247.
18. Davies-Thompson J, Gouws A, Andrews TJ. 2009. An image-dependent representation of familiar and unfamiliar faces in the human ventral stream. Neuropsychologia. 47:1627-1635.
19. de Haan M, Johnson MH, Halit H. 2003. Development of face-sensitive event-related potentials during infancy: a review. Int J Psychophy-siol. 51:45-58. (Pubitemid 37415246)
20. de Haan M, Nelson CA. 1997. Recognition of the mother's face by six month-old infants: a neurobehavioral study. Child Dev. 68:187-210. (Pubitemid 127456013)
21. de Haan M, Nelson CA. 1999. Brain activity differentiates face and object processing by 6-month-old infants. Dev Psychol. 34:1114-1121.
22. Diamond R, Carey S. 1986. Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. J Exp Psychol Gen. 115:107-117.
23. Diamond R, Carey S, Black KJ. 1983. Genetic influences on the development of spatial skills during adolescence. Cognition. 13:167-185.
24. Ellis HD, Shepard J, Bruce A. 1973. The effects of age and sex on adolescents' recognition of faces. J Genet Psychol. 123:173-174.
25. Epstein RA. 2008. Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation. Trends Cogn Sci. 12:388-396.
26. Epstein R, Graham KS, Downing PE. 2003. Viewpoint specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex. Neuron. 37:865-876. (Pubitemid 36288558)
27. Ewbank MP, Andrews TJ. 2008. Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex. Neuroimage. 40:1857-1870.
28. Ewbank MP, Schluppeck D, Andrews TJ. 2005. FMR-adaptation reveals a distributed representation of inanimate objects and places in human visual cortex. Neuroimage. 28:268-279. (Pubitemid 41393906)
29. Flin RH. 1985. Development of face recognition: an encoding switch? Br J Psychol. 76:123-134.
30. Forman SD, Cohen JD, Fitzgerald M, Eddy WF, Mintun MA, Noll DC. 1995. Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn Reson Med. 5:636-647.
31. Fulton A, Bartlett JC. 1991. Young and old faces in young and old heads: the factor of age in face recognition. Psychol Aging. 6:623-630.
32. Gathers AD, Bhatt R, Corbly CR, Farley AB, Joseph JE. 2004. Developmental shifts in cortical loci for face and object recognition. Neuroreport. 15:1549-1553. (Pubitemid 38971169)
33. Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Anderson AW, Skudlarski P, Gore JC. 1999. Activation of the middle fusiform "face area" increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nat Neurosci. 2:568-573. (Pubitemid 30491239)
34. Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Moylan J, Skudlarski P, Gore JC, Anderson AW. 2000. The fusiform "face area" is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. J Cogn Neurosci. 12:495-504. (Pubitemid 30410288)
35. Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols T. 2002. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage. 15:870-878. (Pubitemid 34852500)
36. Gilaie-Dotan S, Malach R. 2007. Sub-exemplar shape tuning in human face-related areas. Cerebral Cortex. 17:325-338. (Pubitemid 46052771)
37. Golarai G, Ghahremani DG, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Reiss A, Eberhardt JL, Gabrieli JD, Grill-Spector K. 2007. Differential development of high-level visual cortex correlates with category-specific recognition memory. Nat Neurosci. 10:512-522. (Pubitemid 46494586)
38. Golarai G, Liberman A, Yoon JMD, Grill-Spector K. 2010. Differential development of the ventral visual cortex extends through adolescence. Fron Hum Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.080.2009.
39. Grill-Spector K, Henson R, Martin A. 2006. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn Sci. 10:14-23. (Pubitemid 43049768)
40. Grill-Spector K, Kushnir T, Edelman S, Avidan G, Itzchak Y, Malach R. 1999. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron. 24:187-203. (Pubitemid 29466158)
41. Grill-Spector K, Malach R. 2001. fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychol Amst. 107:293-321. (Pubitemid 33647324)
42. Hasson U, Nir Y, Levy I, Fuhrmann G, Malach R. 2004. Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science. 303:1634-1640. (Pubitemid 38338315)
43. Haxby JV, Horwitz B, Ungerleider LG, Maisog JM, Pietrini P, Grady CL. 1994. The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: a PET-rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations. J Neurosci. 14:6336-6353. (Pubitemid 24333057)
44. Henson RN, Rylands A, Ross E, Vuilleumeir P, Rugg MD. 2004. The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming. Neuroimage. 21:1674-1689. (Pubitemid 38446590)
45. Herba C, Phillips M. 2004. Annotation: development of facial expression recognition from childhood to adolescence: behavioural and neurological perspectives. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 45:1185-1198. (Pubitemid 39255821)
46. Humphreys K, Hasson U, Avidan G, Minshew NJ, Behrmann M. 2008. Cortical patterns of category-selective activation for faces, places, and objects in adults with autism. Autism Research. 1:52-63.
47. Itier RJ, Taylor MJ. 2004. Face recognition memory and configural processing: a developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces. J Cogn Neurosci. 16:487-502. (Pubitemid 38392406)
48. Joseph JE, Gathers AD, Bhatt R. Forthcoming 2010. Progressive and regressive developmental changes in neural substrates for face processing: testing specific predictions of the interactive specialization account. Dev Sci. 16:487-502.
49. Kang HC, Burgund ED, Lugar HM, Petersen SE, Schlaggar BL. 2003. Comparison of functional activation foci in children and adults using a common stereotactic space. Neuroimage. 19:16-28. (Pubitemid 36627377)
50. Kanwisher N, Yovel G. 2006. The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 361:2109-2128. (Pubitemid 46025883)
51. Konen CS, Kastner S. 2008. Two hierarchically organized neural systems for object information in human visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 11:224-231. (Pubitemid 351170496)
52. Kriegeskorte N, Formisano E, Sorger B, Goebel R. 2007. Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:20600-20605.
53. Kriegeskorte N, Lindquist MA, Nichols TE, Poldrack RA, Vul E. 2010. Everything you never wanted to know about circular analysis, but were afraid to ask. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 30:1551-1557.
54. Kriegeskorte N, Simmons WK, Bellgowan PS, Baker CI. 2009. Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping. Nat Neurosci. 12:535-540.
55. Landauer TK. 1986. How much do people remember? Some estimates of the quantity of learning information in long-term memory. Cogn Sci. 10:477-493.
56. Maurer D, Grand RL, Mondloch CJ. 2002. The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cogn Sci. 6:255-260. (Pubitemid 34597233)
57. Maurer D, Salapatek P. 1976. Developmental changes in the scanning of faces by young infants. Child Dev. 47:523-527.
58. Mazard A, Schiltz C, Rossion B. 2006. Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia. 44:912-922.
59. McGivern RF, Andersen J, Byrd D, Mutter KL, Reilly J. 2002. Cognitive efficiency on a match to sample task decreases at the onset of puberty in children. Brain Cogn. 50:73-89. (Pubitemid 35316962)
60. Meng M, Singal G, Cherian T, Sinha P. 2008. Neural correlates of categorical face perception. J Vis. 8:407[abstract].
61. Mervis CB, Crisafi MA. 1982. Order of acquisition of subordinate-basic- and superordinate-level categories. Child Dev. 53:258-266.
62. Mondloch CJ, Dobson KS, Parsons J, Mauer D. 2004. Why 8-year-olds cannot tell the difference between Steve Martin and Paul Newman: factors contributing to the slow development of sensitivity to the spacing of facial features. J Exp Child Psychol. 89:159-181. (Pubitemid 39258512)
63. Mondloch CJ, Le Grand R, Maurer D. 2002. Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception. 31:553-566.
64. Nestor A, Vettel JM, Tarr M. 2008. Task-specific codes for face recognition: how they shape the neural representation of features for detection and individuation. PLoS One. 312:e3978.
65. Park S, Chun MM. 2009. Different roles of the parahippocampal place area PPA and retrosplenial cortex RSC in panoramic scene perception. Neuroimage. 47:1747-1756.
66. Passarotti AM, Paul BM, Bussiere JR, Buxton RB, Wong E, Stiles J. 2003. The development of face and location processing: an fMRI study. Dev Sci. 6:100-117. (Pubitemid 36357356)
67. Peelen MV, Glaser B, Vuilleumier P, Eliez S. 2009. Differential development of selectivity for faces and bodies in the fusiform gyrus. Dev Sci. 12:F16-F25.
68. Pelphrey KA, Lopez J, Morris JP. 2009. Developmental continuity and change in responses to social and nonsocial categories in human extrastriate cortex. Front Hum Neurosci. 3:25.
69. Pierce K, Redcay E. 2008. Fusiform function in children with autism spectrum disorder is a matter of "who". Biol Psychiatry. 64:552-560.
70. Quinn P. 2004. Development of subordinate-level categorization in 3-to 7-month-old infants. Child Dev. 75:886-899. (Pubitemid 39080385)
71. Quinn P, Tanaka J. 2007. Early development of perceptual expertise: within basic-level categorization experience facilitates the formation of subordinate-level category representations in 6-to7-month-old infants. Mem Cognit. 35:4122-4131.
72. Rajimehr R, Young JC, Tootell RB. 2009. An anterior temporal face patch in human cortex, predicted by macaque maps. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:1995-2000.
73. Rhodes G, Michie PT, Hughes ME, Byatt G. 2009. The fusiform face area and occipital face area show sensitivity to spatial relations in faces. Eur J Neurosci. 30:721-733.
74. Rosch E. 1978. Principles of categorization. In: Rosch E, Lloyd BB, editors. Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum. p. 27-48.
75. Rossion B, Dricot L, Devolder A, Bodart JM, Crommelinck M, De Gelder B, Zoontjes R. 2000. Hemispheric asymmetries for whole-based and part-based face processing in the human fusiform gyrus. J Cogn Neurosci. 12:793-802.
76. Rotshtein P, Henson RNA, Treves A, Driver J, Dolan RJ. 2005. Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nat Neurosci. 8:107-113. (Pubitemid 41236739)
77. Sangrigoli S, de Schonen S. 2004. Effect of visual experience on face processing: a developmental study of inversion and non-native effects. Dev Sci. 7:74-87. (Pubitemid 38213659)
78. Sayres RA, Grill-Spector K. 2006. Object-selective cortex exhibits performance independent repetition-suppression. J Neurophysiol. 95:995-1007. (Pubitemid 44699101)
79. Scherf KS, Behrmann M, Humphreys K, Luna B. 2007. Visual category-selectivity for faces places and objects emerges along different developmental trajectories. Dev Sci. 10:F15-F30.
80. Scherf KS, Behrmann M, Kimchi R, Luna B. 2008. The emergence of global shape processing continues into adolescence. Child Dev. 80:162-177.
81. Scherf KS, Luna B, Minshew NJ, Behrmann M. 2010. Location, location, location: Alterations in the functional topography of face-but not object-or place-related cortex in adolescents with autism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 22:4-26.
82. Schlitz C, Dricot L, Goebel R, Rossion B. 2010. Holistic perception of individual faces in the right middle fusiform gyrus as evidenced by the composite face illusion. J Vis. 10:1-16.
83. Schultz R, Pilz KS. 2009. Natural facial motion enhances cortical responses to faces. Exp Brain Res. 194:465-475.
84. Scott LS, Shannon RW, Nelson CA. 2006. Neural correlates of human and monkey face processing in 9-month-old infants. Infancy. 10:171-186. (Pubitemid 44596424)
85. Sergent J, Ohta S, MacDonald B. 1992. Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission study. Brain. 115:15-36.
86. Simmons WK, Bellgowan PS, Martin A. 2007. Measuring selectivity in fMRI data. Nat Neurosci. 101:4-5.
87. Sobotka S, Ringo JL. 1994. Stimulusspecific adaptation in excited but not inhibited cells in inferotemporal cortex of macaque. Brain Res. 646:95-99. (Pubitemid 24140157)
88. Sugiura M, Kawashima R, Nakamure K, Sato N, Nakamure A, Kato T, Hatano K, Schormann T, Zilles K, Sato K, et al. 2001. Activation reduction in anterior temporal cortices during repeated recognition of faces of personal acquaintances. Neuroimage. 13:877-890. (Pubitemid 32848332)
89. Tanaka JW, Taylor M. 1991. Object categories and expertise: is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cogn Psychol. 23:457-482.
90. Tottenham N, Tanaka J, Leon AC, McCarry T, Nurse M, et al. 2009. The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Res. 168:108-120.
91. Want SC, Pascalis O, Coleman M, Blades M. 2003. Recognizing people from the inner or outer parts of their faces: developmental data concerning "unfamiliar" faces. Br J Dev Psychol. 21:125-135. (Pubitemid 40322431)
92. Winston JS, HEnson RN, Fine-Goulden MR, Dolan RJ. 2004. fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. J Neurophysiol. 92: 1820-1839.
93. Wright DB, Stroud JN. 2002. Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: people are better with their own age. Law Hum Behav. 26:641-654. (Pubitemid 38420788)
94. Xu A, Yue X, Lescroart MD, Biederman I, Kim JG. 2009. Adaptation in the fusiform face area (FFA): image or person? Vision Res. 49:2800-2807.
95. Yovel G, Tambini A, Brandman T. 2008. The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces. Neuropsychologia. 4613:3061-3068.