Representations in visual cognition: It's about time

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 116-120

  van Zoest, Wieske ^a   Hunt, Amelia R ^b   Kingstone, Alan ^c  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attention and perception; Dynamics; Visual representations

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953792524     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963721410363895     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J.F., & Goodale, M.A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679-685.
2. Bacon, W.F., & Egeth, H.E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485-496.
3. Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G.L. (2008). The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. Neuron, 58, 306-324.
4. Di Lollo, V., Enns, J.T., & Rensink, R.A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481-507.
5. Donk, M., & van Zoest, W. (2008). Effects of salience are short-lived. Psychological Science, 19, 733-739.
6. Gibson, J.J. (2009). Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 259-271. (Original work published 1958).
7. Hickey, C., van Zoest, W., & Theeuwes, J. (in press). The time course of exogenous and endogenous control of covert attention. Experimental Brain Research.
8. Hunt, A.R., von Mühlenen, A., & Kingstone, A. (2007). The time course of attentional and oculomotor capture reveals a common cause. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 271-284.
9. Kingstone, A. (1992). Combining expectancies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 69-104.
10. Lamme, V.A., & Roelfsema, P.R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neuroscience, 23, 571-579.
11. Lleras, A., & Enns, J.T. (2004). Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 475-493.
12. Neely, J.H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory-roles of inhibition-less spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226-254.
13. Posner, M.I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouman & D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X. (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Roelfsema, P.R., Tolboom, M., & Khayat, P.S. (2007). Different processing phases for features, figures, and selective attention in the primary visual cortex. Neuron, 56, 785-792.
15. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
16. van Zoest, W., Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2004). The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 746-759.