Intensive forest biomass harvesting and biodiversity in Canada: A summary of relevant issues1

Forestry Chronicle

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 478-487

  Berch, Shannon M ^a   Morris, Dave ^b   Malcolm, Jay ^c  

^a Ministry of Environment British Columbia   (Canada)

^b LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Forest biomass harvesting; Forest policy implications; Research gaps

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; BIOMASS HARVEST; BIOMASS REMOVAL; COMPLEX INFORMATION; DEAD WOOD; DECISION MAKERS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES; FOREST BIOMASS; FOREST MANAGERS; FOREST POLICY IMPLICATIONS; KNOWLEDGE GAPS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; MANAGED FOREST; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; POLICY MAKERS; RENEWABLE FUELS; SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION; SUSTAINABLE FOREST; TORONTO; WOODY DEBRIS; WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS;

BIODIVERSITY; DEBRIS; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; HARVESTING; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MANAGERS; PUBLIC POLICY;

BIOMASS;

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; ALTERNATIVE FUEL; ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; GUIDELINE; HABITAT QUALITY; HARVESTING; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEM; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; TRADE-ENVIRONMENT RELATIONS; WOODY DEBRIS;

CANADA;

EID: 80051763183     PISSN: 00157546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5558/tfc2011-046     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Barengo, N., T.N. Sieber and O. Holdenrieder. 2000. Diversity of endophytic mycobiota in leaves and twigs of pubescent birch (Betula pubescens). Sydowia 52: 305-320. (Pubitemid 33224951)
2. Bell, F.W., J.A. Baker, G. Bruemmer, J. Pineau and A. Stinson. 2008. The Canadian Ecology Centre - Forestry Research Partnership: Implementing a research strategy based on an active adaptive management approach. For. Chron. 84: 666-677.
3. Berg A., B. Ehnström, L. Gustafsson, T. Hallingbäck, M. Jonsell and J. Weslien. 1994. Threatened plant, animal, and fungus species in Swedish forests: distribution and habitat associations. Conserv. Biol. 8: 718-731 (Pubitemid 2139332)
4. Berglund, H. and B. Jonsson. 2008. Assessing the extinction vulnerability of wood-inhabiting fungal species in fragmented northern Swedish boreal forests. Biol. Conserv. 141: 3029-3039.
5. [BCMFR] British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range. 2008. Resource Stewardship Monitoring: Stand-level Biodiversity Analysis of2005/2006 Field Season Data by Biogeoclimatic Zone. B.C. Min. For. Ran., For. Prac. Br., Victoria, B.C. FREP.
6. Buddle, C.M., D.W. Langor, G.R. Pohl and J.R. Spence. 2006. Arthropod responses to harvesting and wildfire: Implications for emulation of natural disturbance in forest management. Biol. Conserv. 128: 346-357. (Pubitemid 43039962)
7. Bunnell, F.L. and L. Houde. 2010. Down wood and biodiversity - implications to forest practices. Environ. Rev. 18: 397-421.
8. Camacho, F.J., D.S. Gernandt, A. Liston, J.K. Stone and A. S. Klein. 1997. Endophytic fungal DNA, the source of contamination in spruce needle DNA. Molecular Ecol. 6: 983-987. (Pubitemid 27447143)
9. Clarkson, D.A. and L.S. Mills. 1994. Hypogeous sporocarps in forest remnants and clearcuts in southwest Oregon. Northwest Sci. 68: 259-265. (Pubitemid 26449029)
10. Cole, H.A., S.G. Newmaster, F.W. Bell., D. Pitt and A. Stinson. 2008. Influence of microhabitat on bryophyte diversity in Ontario mixedwood boreal forest. Can. J. For. Res. 38: 1867-1876. (Pubitemid 352016884)
11. Densmore, N. 2010. Coarse Woody Debris Backgrounder. FREP Extension Note #8. Available at https://www.for.gov.bc.ca/ftp/HFP/external/!publish/FREP/ extension/FREP-Extension-Note-08.pdf.
12. Desponts, M., A. Desrochers, L. Belanger and J. Huot. 2002. Structure of managed and old-growth fir stands in the Laurentian Mountains (Quebec) and diversity of nonvascular plants. Can. J. For. Res. 32: 2077-2093. (Pubitemid 36229734)
13. Ferris, R. and J.W. Humphrey. 1999.A review of potential biodiversity indicators for application in British forests. Forestry 72: 313-328.
14. Fischer, A.L. 2008. Composition and richness of fruiting body and molecular fungal taxa of woody debris in boreal forest sites. Unpubl. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON.
15. Forest Panel of Expertise. 2010a. Restoring the health of Nova Scotia's Forests. Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources. Availableat http://www.gov.ns.ca/natr/strategy2010/pdf/phase2-reports/Forests-Health.pdf.
16. Forest Panel of Expertise. 2010b. The roots of sustainable prosperity in Nova Scotia. Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources. Available at http://www.gov.ns.ca/natr/strategy2010/pdf/phase2-reports/Forests-Roots.pdf.
17. Gomez, D.M., R.G. Anthony and J.M. Trappe. 2003. The influence of thinning on production of hypogeous fungus sporocarps in Douglas-fir forests in the northern Oregon Coast Range Northwest Sci.77: 308-319.
18. Gordon, A.M., D.M. Morris and A.G. Gordon. 2001. Ecological considerations in forest regeneration and management. In R.G. Wagner and S.J. Colombo (eds.). Regenerating the Canadian Forest: Principles and Practice for Ontario. pp. 63-90. Fitzhenry & Whiteside, Markam, ON.
19. Groffman, P.M. et al. 2006. Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application? Ecosystems 9: 1-13.
20. Hansen, A.J., T.A. Spies, F.J. Swanson and J.L.Ohmann. 1991. Conserving biodiversity in managed forests. BioScience 41: 382-392.
21. Hesselink, T.P. 2010. Increasing pressures to use forest biomass: a conservation viewpoint. For. Chron. 86: 28-35.
22. Holling, C. S. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
23. Homan, R.N., B.S. Windmiller and J.M. Reed. 2004. Critical thresholds associated with habitat loss for vernal pool-breeding amphibians. Ecol. Appl. 14:1547-1553. (Pubitemid 39385168)
24. Huggett, A.J. 2005. The concept and utility of "ecological thresholds" in biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 124: 301-310. (Pubitemid 40483232)
25. Hunt, S.L., A.M. Gordon and D. M. Morris. 2005. Aspects of ecological development in managed stands of jack pine and black spruce in northern Ontario: Understory vegetation and nutrient relations. For. Chron. 81: 61-72.
26. Hunt, S.L., A.M. Gordon and D.M. Morris. 2010. Carbon stocks in managed conifer forests in northern Ontario, Canada. Silva Fennica 44: 563-582.
27. Hunter, M.L. and A. Calhoun. 1996. A triad approach to land-use allocation. In R.C. Szaro and D.W. Johnston (eds.) Biodiversity in managed landscapes. pp. 477-491. Oxford University Press, New York. Available at http://forestry.oxfordjournals.org/content/80/3/279.full.
28. Hylander, K. and M. Dynesius. 2006. Causes of the large variation in bryophyte species richness and composition among boreal streamside forests. J. Veg. Sci. 17: 333-346. (Pubitemid 44197066)
29. Imbeau, L., M. Mönkkönen and A. Desrochers. 2001. Long-term effects of forestry on birds of the eastern Canadian boreal forests: A comparison with Fennoscandia. Cons. Biol. 15: 1151-1162. (Pubitemid 32706854)
30. Janowiak, M.K. and C.R. Webster. 2010. Promoting ecological sustainability in woody biomass harvesting. J. For. 108: 16-23.
31. Josefsson, T., J. Olsson and L. Östlund. 2010. Linking forest history and conservation efforts: Long-term impact of low-intensity timber harvest on forest structure and wood inhabiting fungi in northern Sweden. Biol. Conserv. 143: 1803-1811.
32. Kuuluvainen, T. and R. Laiho. 2004. Long-term forest utilization can decrease forest floor microhabitat diversity: Evidence from boreal Fennoscandia. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 303-309. (Pubitemid 38600972)
33. Lattimore, B., T. Smith and J. Richardson. 2010. Coping with complexity: Designing low-impact forest bioenergy systems using an adaptive forest management framework and other sustainable forest management tools. For. Chron. 86: 20-27.
34. Lee, K.N. 1993. Compass and Gyroscope - Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Island Press, Washington, DC. 243 p.
35. Levin, R. and H. Eriksson. 2010. Good-practice guidelines for whole-tree harvesting in Sweden: Moving science into policy. For Chron. 86: 51-56.
36. McComb, B.C. 2008. Wildlife habitat management: Concepts and applications in forestry. CRC Press. 319 p.
37. [MFRC] Minnesota Forest Resources Council. 2007. Biomass harvesting guidelines for forestlands, brushlands, and open lands. In Sustaining Minnesota Forest Resources: Voluntary Site-Level Forest management Guidelines for Landowners, Loggers, and Resource Managers. Minnesota Resources Council, St. Paul, MN. 415 p. + Appendices.
38. Moretti, M. and C. Legg. 2009. Combining plant and animal traits to assess community functional responses to disturbance. Ecography 32: 299-309.
39. Morris, D.M., D.E.B. Reid, S.L. Hunt, A.M. Gordon and M. Kwiaton. 2011. Growth patterns from a chronosequence of jack pine and black spruce stands: mixed natural versus plantations. Submitted to: Nor. J. Appl. For. (under review)
40. Naylor, B.J. 1994. Managing wildlife habitat in red pine and white pine forests of central Ontario. For. Chron. 70: 411-419.
41. Nordén, B., M. Ryberg, F. Götmark and B. Olausson. 2004. Relative importance of coarse and fine woody debris for the diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi in temperate broadleaf forests. Biol. Conserv. 117: 1-10. (Pubitemid 38157647)
42. Noss, R.F. and A. Cooperrider. 1994. Saving nature's legacy: Protecting and restoring biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, DC. 416 p.
43. Oøkland, B. 1994. Mycetophilidae (Diptera), an insect group vulnerable to forestry? A comparison of clearcut, managed and seminatural spruce forests in southern Norway. Biodivers. Conserv. 3: 68-85. (Pubitemid 2048046)
44. [OMNR] Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. 2001. Forest management guide for natural disturbance pattern emulation, Ver. 3.1. Queen's Printer for Ontario, Toronto, ON.
45. -. 2008. Forest biofibre - allocation and use. Ont. Min. Nat. Resour., For. Manage. Br., Toronto, ON. For. Manage. Direct. FOR 03 02 01. 5 p. Available at http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/stdprodconsume/groups/lr/@mnr/@forests/documents/ document/275477.pdf.
46. Penttilä, R., M. Lindgren, O. Miettinen, H. Rita and I. Hanski. 2006. Consequences of forest fragmentation for polyporous fungi at two spatial scales. Oikos 114: 225-240. (Pubitemid 44114615)
47. Porter, T.M. , C.W. Schadt, L. Rizvi, A.P. Martin, S.K. Schmidt, L. Scott-Denton, R. Vilgalys and J.M. Moncalvo. 2008. Widespread occurrence and phylogenetic placement of a soil clone group adds a prominent new branch to the fungal tree of life. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 46: 635-644. (Pubitemid 351215923)
48. Province of British Columbia. 2009. Protocol for Stand-level Biodiversity Monitoring: Steps for Field Data Collection and Administration. Forest and Range Evaluation Program. B.C. Min. For. And B.C. Min. Environ.
49. Ralevic, P., M. Ryans and D. Cormier. 2010. Assessing forest biomass for bioenergy: Operational challenges and cost considerations. For. Chron. 86: 43-50.
50. Ranius, T. and M. Jonsson. 2007. Theoretical expectations for thresholds in the relationship between number of wood-living species and amount of coarse woody debris: A study case in spruce forests. J. Nature Conserv. 15: 120-130. (Pubitemid 46930730)
51. Ranius, T. and O. Kindvall. 2006. Extinction risk of wood-living model species in forest landscapes as related to forest history and conservation strategy. Landscape Ecol. 21: 687-698. (Pubitemid 44087279)
52. Rassi, P., H. Kaipiainen, I. Mannerkoski and G. Ståhls. 1992. Report on the monitoring of threatened animals and plants in Finland. Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland. In Finnish with English summary.
53. Rompré, G., Y. Boucher, L. Bélanger, S. Côté and W.D. Robinson. 2010. Conserving biodiversity in managed forest landscapes: The use of critical thresholds for habitat. For. Chron. 86: 589-596.
54. Saikkonen, K. 2007. Forest structure and fungal endophytes. Fungal Biol. Rev. 21: 67-74. (Pubitemid 47405317)
55. Schmidt, S.K., K.L. Wilson, A.F. Meyer, C.W. Schadt, T.M. Porter and J.M. Moncalvo. 2008. The missing fungi: New insights from culture-independent molecular studies of soil. In K. Zengler (ed.). Accessing Uncultivated Microorganisms: From the Environment to Organisms and Genomes and Back. pp. 55-66. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
56. Sherwood, M. and G. Carroll. 1974. Fungal succession on needles and young twigs of old-growth Douglas-fir. Mycologia 66: 499-506.
57. Sieber, T.N., F. Sieber-Canavesi and C.E. Dorworth. 1991. Endophytic fungi of red alder (Alnus rubra) leaves and twigs in British Columbia. Can. J. Bot. 69: 407-411.
58. Siitonen, J. 2001. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol. Bull. 49: 11-41.
59. Sippola, A.-L., T. Lehesvirta and P. Renvall. 2001. Effects of selective logging on coarse woody debris and diversity of wood-decaying polypores in eastern Finland. Ecol. Bull. 49: 243-254.
60. Skogsstyrelsen. 2008. Rekommendationer vid uttag av avverkningsrester och askåterföring (Recommendations for extraction of logging residues and ash recycling). Skogsstyrelsen, Meddelande 2-2008 [in Swedish] [online]. Available at http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/forlag/meddelande/1562.pdf.
61. Spence, J.R., D.W. Langor, J. Niemelä, H.A. Carcamo and C.R. Currie. 1996. Northern forestry and carabids: The case for concern about old-growth species. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 33: 173-184. (Pubitemid 26369895)
62. Thiffault, E., D. Paré, S. Brais and B.D. Titus. 2010. Intensive biomass removals and site productivity in Canada: A review of relevant issues. For. Chron. 86: 36-42.
63. Tilman, D., R.M. May, C.L. Lehman and M.A. Nowak. 2002. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371: 65-66.
64. Titus, B., D.G. Maynard, C.C. Dymond, G. Stinson and W.A. Kurz. 2009. Wood energy: Protect local ecosystems. Sci. 324: 1389-1390.
65. Titus, B., T. Smith, D. Puddister and J. Richardson. 2010. The scientific foundation for sustainable forest biomass harvesting guidelines and policies. For. Chron. 86: 18-19.
66. Vanderwel, M.C., J.R. Malcolm, S.M. Smith and N. Islam. 2006. Insect community composition and trophic guild structure in decaying logs from eastern Canadian pine-dominated forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 225: 190-199.
67. Verschuyl, J., S. Riffell, D. Miller and T.B. Wigley. 2011. Biodiversity response to intensive biomass production from forest thinning in North American forests: A meta-analysis. For. Ecol. Manage. 261: 221-232.
68. Walker, B.H. 1992. Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv. Biol. 6: 18-23. (Pubitemid 23397047)
69. Walmsley, J.D., D.L. Jones, B. Reynolds, M.H. Price and J.R. Healey. 2009.Whole tree harvesting can reduce second rotation forest productivity. For. Ecol. and Manage. 257: 1104-1111.
70. Walters, C. 1986. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. MacMillan Publishing Company, New York. 374 p.
71. Wang, C., B. Bond-Lamberty and S.T. Gower. 2003. Carbon distribution of a well- and poorly-drained black spruce fire chronosequence. Global Change Biol. 9: 1066-1079. (Pubitemid 36938398)
72. Wei, X., W. Liu, J. Waterhouse and M. Armleder. 2000. Simulations on impacts of different management strategies on long-term productivity in lodgepole pine forests of the central interior of British Columbia. For. Ecol. Manage. 133: 217-229. (Pubitemid 30495861)
73. Work, T.T., D.P. Shorthouse, J.R. Spence, W.J. A. Volney and D. Langor. 2004. Stand composition and structure of the boreal mixedwood and epigaeic arthropods of the Ecosystem Management Emulating Natural Disturbance (EMEND) landbase in northwestern Alberta. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 417-430. (Pubitemid 38600983)