Case study: Effect of Propionibacteria Supplementation on Yield of Milk and Milk Components of Dairy Cows

Professional Animal Scientist

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 254-259

  de Ondarza, M B ^a   Seymour, W M ^b  

^a Paradox Nutrition LLC   (United States)

^b DSM NUTRITIONAL PRODUCTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Milk components; Milk yield; Propionibacteria; Reproduction

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051755705     PISSN: 10807446     EISSN: 1525318X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1532/S1080-7446(15)30848-2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Official methods of analysis 1990, AOAC, Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem, Arlington, VA, Vol. 1. 15th ed.
2. Official methods of analysis 2000, AOAC, Assoc. of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, Vol. 1. 17th ed.
3. Chagunda M.G.G., Friggens N.C., Rasmussen M.D., Larsen T. A model for detection of individual cow mastitis based on an indicator measured in milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89:2980.
4. Version 3.07a. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square W. H 1998, CPM-Dairy, Miner Agricultural Research Institute, Chazy, NY.
5. Dubois M., Gilles K.A., Hamilton J.K., Rebers P.A., Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28:350.
6. Ghorbani G.R., Morgavi D.P., Beauchemin K.A., Leedle J.A.Z. Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials on rumen fermentation, blood variables, and the microbial populations of feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 80:1977.
7. Goering H.K., Va Soest P.J. For-age Fiber Analyses (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications). Agric. Hand-book No. 379 1970, ARS-USDA, Washington, DC.
8. Guide for the Care and Use of Ag-ricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching 1999, FASS, Fed. Anim. Sci. Soc, Savoy, IL. 1st rev. ed.
9. Francisco C.C., Chamberlain C.S., Waldner D.N., Wettemann R.P., Spicer L.J. Propionibacteria fed to dairy cows: effects on energy balance, plasma metabolites and hormones, and reproduction. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85:1738.
10. Holm J., Bjorck I., Drews A., Asp N.G. A rapid method for the analysis of starch. Starch 1986, 7:224.
11. Jones L.R., Spahr S.L., Puckett H.B. Variability and reliability of real-time milk conductivity data. J. Dairy Sci. 1994, 77:80.
12. Kim S.W., Standorf D.G., Roman-Rosario H., Yokoyama M.T., Rust S.R. Potential use of Propionibacterium acidipropionici strain DH42, as a direct-fed microbial for cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 78:83.
13. Krehbiel C.R., Rust S.R., Zhang G., Gilliland S.E. Bacterial direct-fed microbials in ruminant diets: Performance response and mode of action. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 81:120.
14. Krishnamoorthy U., Muscato T.V., Sniffen C.J., Van Soest P.J. Nitrogen fractions of selected feedstuffs. J. Dairy Sci. 1982, 65:217.
15. Kung L., Hession A., Tung R.S., Maciorowski K. Effect of Propionibacterium shermanni on ruminal fermentations. Proc. 21st Biennial Conf. on Rumen Function. Chicago, IL. (Abstr.). 1991, 33.
16. Lehloenya K.V., Stein D.R., Allen D.T., Selk G.E., Jones D.A., Aleman M.M., Rehberger T.G., Mertz K.J., Spicer L.J. Effects of feeding yeast and propionibacteria to dairy cows on milk yield and components and reproduction. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2008, 92:190.
17. 2.2.2.5. Dry matter by oven drying for 3 hr at 105°C 2002, NFTA, NFTA, Omaha, NE, Accessed Mar. 17, 2008. http://www.foragetes-ting.org/lab_procedure/sectionB/2.2/part2.2.2.5.htm.
18. Owens F.N., Secrist D.S., Hill W.J., Gill D.R. Acidosis in cattle: A review. J. Anim. Sci. 1998, 76:275.
19. Raeth-Knight M.L., Linn J.G., Jung H.G. Effect of direct-fed microbials on performance, diet digestibility, and rumen characteristics of Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90:1802.
20. Stein D.R., Allen D.T., Perry E.B., Bruner J.C., Gates K.W., Rehberger T.G., Mertz K., Jones D., Spicer L.J. Effects of feeding propionibacteria to dairy cows on milk yield, milk components, and reproduction. J. Dairy Sci. 1995, 89:111.