The parallel representation of the objects selected by attention

Journal of Vision

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1-10

  de Wit, Lee H ^a   Cole, Geoff G ^b   Kentridge, Robert W ^c   Milner, A David ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D surface and shape perception; Attention; Object recognition; Perceptual organization

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 80051752984     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/11.4.1     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Chen, Z., & Cave, K. R. (2006). Reinstating object-based attention under positional certainty: The importance of subjective parsing. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 992-1003.
2. Chen, Z., & Cave, K. R. (2008). Object-based attention with endogenous cuing and positional certainty. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1435-1443.
3. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87-185.
4. Davis, G., & Driver, J. (1998). Kanizsa subjective figures can act as occluding surfaces at parallel stages of visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 169-184.
5. Driver, J., Davis, G., Russell, C., Turatto,M., & Freeman, E. (2001). Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects. Cognition, 80, 61-95.
6. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
7. Duncan, J., Ward, R., & Shapiro, K. (1994). Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature, 369, 313-315.
8. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
9. Goldsmith, M., & Yeari, M. (2003). Modulation of objectbased attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 897-918.
10. Law, M. B., & Abrams, R. A. (2002). Object-based selection within and beyond the focus of spatial attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1017-1027.
11. Macquistan, A. D. (1997). Object-based allocation of visual attention in response to exogenous, but not endogenous, spatial precues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 512-515.
12. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
13. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
14. Scholl, B. J., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999). Tracking multiple items through occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 259-290.
15. Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1-46.
16. Scholl, B. J., Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Feldman, J. (2001). What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking. Cognition, 80, 159-177.
17. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). Feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
18. Watson, S. E., & Kramer, A. F. (1999). Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 31-49.
19. Wolfe, J. M. (2003). Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 70-76.
20. Wolfe, J. M., Oliva, A., Horowitz, T. S., Butcher, S. J., & Bompas, A. (2002). Segmentation of objects from backgrounds in visual search tasks. Vision Research, 42, 2985-3004.