Integration: Valuing stakeholder input in setting priorities for socially sustainable egg production

Poultry Science

Volumn 90, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 2110-2121

  Swanson, J C ^a   Lee, Y ^b   Thompson, P B ^a   Bawden, R ^c   Mench, J A ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Systemic Development Institute   (Australia)

Author keywords

Egg production; Stakeholder; Sustainable

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 80051745854     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3382/ps.2011-01340     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Batie, S. S. 2008. Wicked problems and applied economics. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 90:1176-1191.
2. Bennett, R. M., and R. J. P. Blaney. 2003. Estimating the benefits of farm animal welfare legislation using the contingent valuation method. Agric. Econ. 29:85-98. doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2003. tb00149.x.
3. Blandford, D., and L. Fulponi. 1999. Emerging public concerns in agriculture: Domestic policies and international trade commitments. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 26:409-424.
4. Botreau, R., M. Bonde, A. Butterworth, P. Perny, M. B. M. Bracke, J. Capdeville, and I. Veissier. 2007a. Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 1: A review of existing methods. Animal 1:1179-1187. doi:10.1017/ s1751731107000535.
5. Botreau, R., M. B. M. Bracke, R. Perny, A. Butterworth, J. Capdeville, C. G. Van Reenen, and I. Veissier. 2007b. Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 2: Analysis of constraints. Animal 1:1188-1197. doi:10.1017/ s1751731107000547.
6. Botreau, R., I. Veissier, A. Butterworth, M. B. M. Bracke, and L. J. Keeling. 2007c. Definition of criteria for overall assessment of animal welfare. Anim. Welf. 16:225-228.
7. Botreau, R., I. Veissier, and P. Perny. 2009. Overall assessment of animal welfare: Strategy adopted in Welfare Quality. Anim. Welf. 18:363-370.
8. Bouyssou, D. 1990. Building Criteria: A Prerequisite for MCDA in Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid. C. A. B. e. Costa ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
9. Bracke, M. B. M., K. H. de Greef, and H. Hopster. 2005. Qualitative stakeholder analysis for the development of sustainable monitoring systems for farm animal welfare. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 18:27-56.
10. Bracke, M. B. M., S. A. Edwards, J. H. M. Metz, J. P. T. M. Noordhuizen, and B. Algers. 2008. Synthesis of semantic modelling and risk analysis methodology applied to animal welfare. Animal 2:1061-1072. doi:10.1017/S1751731108002139.
11. Bracke, M. B. M., J. H. M. Metz, B. M. Spruijt, and W. G. P. Schouten. 2002a. Decision support system for overall welfare assessment in pregnant sows B: Validation by expert opinion. J. Anim. Sci. 80:1835-1845.
12. Bracke, M. B. M., B. M. Spruijt, J. H. M. Metz, and W. G. P. Schouten. 2002b. Decision support system for overall welfare assessment in pregnant sows A: Model structure and weighting procedure. J. Anim. Sci. 80:1819-1834.
13. Bracke, M. B. M., J. J. Zonderland, and E. J. B. Bleumer. 2007. Expert consultation on weighting factors of criteria for assessing environmental enrichment materials for pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 104:14-23. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.006.
14. Burke, L. A., and M. K. Miller. 1999. Taking the mystery out of intuitive decision making. Acad. Manage. Exec. 13:91-99.
15. Cornelissen, A. M., G. J. van den Berg, W. J. Koops, M. Grossman, and H. M. J. Ud. 2001. Assessment of the contribution of sustainability indicators to sustainable development: A novel approach using fuzzy set theory. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 86:173-185.
16. D'Aquino, P., C. Le Page, F. Bousquet, and A. Bah. 2003. Using self-designed role-playing games and a multi-agent system to empower a local decision-making process for land use management: The SelfCormas experiment in Senegal. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 6. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/3/5.html.
17. Dane, E., and M. G. Pratt. 2007. Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Acad. Manage. Rev. 32:33-54.
18. Den Ouden, M., J. T. Nijsing, A. A. Dijkhuizen, and R. B. M. Huirne. 1997. Economic optimization of pork production-marketing chains: I. Model input on animal welfare and costs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 48:23-37.
19. Fisher, R., W. Ury, and B. Patton. 1983. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books, New York, NY.
20. Fraser, D. 1995. Science, values and animal welfare: Exploring the 'Inextricable Connection'. Anim. Welf. 4:103-117.
21. Fraser, D. 2003. Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: The interplay of science and values. Anim. Welf. 12:433-443.
22. Fraser, E. D. G., A. J. Dougilla, W. E. Mabeeb, M. Reeda, and P. McAlpinec. 2006. Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. J. Environ. Manage. 78:114-127.
23. Hegelund, L., J. T. Sorensen, and N. F. Johansen. 2003. Developing a welfare assessment system for use in commercial organic egg production. Anim. Welf. 12:649-653.
24. Hobbs, J. E. 1996. A transaction cost analysis of quality, traceability and animal welfare issues in UK beef retailing. Br. Food J. 98:16-26.
25. Holt, P. S., R. H. Davies, J. Dewulf, R. K. Gast, J. K. Huwe, D. R. Jones, D. Waltman, and K. R. Willian. 2011. The impact of different housing systems on egg safety and quality. Poult. Sci. 90:251-262.
26. Lay, D. C., Jr., R. M. Fulton, P. Hester, D. M. Karcher, J. B. Kjaer, J. A. Mench, B. A. Mullens, R. C. Newberry, C. J. Nicol, P. O'Sullivan, and R. E. Porter. 2011. Hen welfare in different housing systems. Poult. Sci. 90:278-294.
27. Mench, J. A., D. A. Sumner, and J. T. Rosen-Molina. 2011. Sustainability of egg production in the United States-The political and market context. Poult. Sci. 90:229-240.
28. Mollenhorst, H., and I. J. M. de Boer. 2004. Identifying sustainability issues using participatory SWOT analysis-A case study of egg production in the Netherlands. Outlook Agric. 33:267-276.
29. Mollenhorst, H., T. B. Rodenburg, E. A. M. Bokkers, P. Koene, and I. J. M. de Boer. 2005. On-farm assessment of laying hen welfare: A comparison of one environment-based and two animal-based methods. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 90:277-291.
30. Nijdam, E., P. Arens, E. Lambooij, E. Decuypere, and J. A. Stegeman. 2004. Factors influencing bruises and mortality of broilers during catching, transport, and lairage. Poult. Sci. 83:1610-1615.
31. Ralls, K., and A. M. Starfield. 2002. Choosing a management strategy: Two structured decision-making methods for evaluating the predictions of stochastic simulation models. Conserv. Biol. 9:175-181.
32. Rittel, H., and M. M. Webber. 1974. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 4:155-169.
33. Rodenburg, T. B., F. A. M. Tuyttens, K. de Reu, L. Herman, J. Zoons, and B. Sonck. 2008a. Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: An on-farm comparison. Anim. Welf. 17:363-373.
34. Rodenburg, T. B., F. A. M. Tuyttens, K. de Reu, L. Herman, J. Zoons, and B. Sonck. 2008b. Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: Assimilating expert opinion. Anim. Welf. 17:355-361.
35. Rushen, J., A. Butterworth, and J. C. Swanson. 2011. Animal welfare assurance: Science and application. J. Anim. Sci. 89:1219-1228.
36. Schwartz, P. 1991. The Art of the Long View. Doubleday, New York, NY.
37. Sørensen, J. T., P. Sandøe, and N. Halberg. 2001. Animal welfare as one among several values to be considered at farm level: The idea of an ethical account for livestock farming. Acta Agric. Scan., Sect. Anim. Sci. 30:11-16.
38. Spoolder, H., G. De Rosa, B. Horning, S. Waiblinger, and F. Wemelsfelder. 2003. Integrating parameters to assess on-farm welfare. Anim. Welf. 12:529-534.
39. Stoffle, R. W., and R. Arnold. 2003. Confronting the angry rock: American Indians' situated risks from radioactivity. Ethnos 68:230-248.
40. Sumner, D. A., H. Gow, D. Hayes, W. Matthews, B. Norwood, J. T. Rosen-Molina, and W. Thurman. 2011. Economic and market issues on the sustainability of egg production in the United States: Analysis of alternative production systems. Poult. Sci. 90:241-250.
41. Swanson, J. C., J. A. Mench, and P. B. Thompson. 2011. Introduction to the Socially Sustainable Egg Production Project. Poult. Sci. 90:227-228.
42. Thompson, P. B., M. Appleby, L. Busch, L. Kalof, M. Miele, B. Norwood, and E. Pajor. 2011. Values and public acceptability dimensions of sustainable egg production. Poult. Sci. 90:2097-2109.
43. Whay, H. R., D. C. J. Main, L. E. Greent, and A. J. F. Webster. 2003. Animal-based measures for the assessment of welfare state of dairy cattle, pigs and laying hens: Consensus of expert opinion. Anim. Welf. 12:205-217.
44. Xin, H., R. S. Gates, A. R. Green, F. M. Mitloehner, P. A. Moore Jr., and C. M. Wathes. 2011. Environmental impacts and sustainability of egg production systems. Poult. Sci. 90:263-277.