Oviposition response of the moth Lobesia botrana to sensory cues from a host plant

Chemical Senses

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 633-639

  Tasin, Marco ^a   Lucchi, Andrea ^b   Ioriatti, Claudio ^a   Mraihi, Mohamed ^a   De cristofaro, Antonio ^c   Boger, Zvi ^d   Anfora, Gianfranco ^a  

^a RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MOLISE   (Italy)

^d BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Contact chemoreception; Dual choice bioassay; Grapevine moth; Insect behavior; Multimodal integration; Olfaction; Plant volatiles; Vision

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CHEMORECEPTOR REFLEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; EGG LAYING; FEMALE; LOBESIA BOTRANA; MOTH; NONHUMAN; OLFACTORY SYSTEM; PLANT HERBIVORE INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY ANALYSIS; SMELLING; VISION;

HEXAPODA; LEPIDOPTERA; LOBESIA BOTRANA; VITIS;

EID: 80051736260     PISSN: 0379864X     EISSN: 14643553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjr027     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anfora G, Tasin M, De Cristofaro A, Ioriatti C, Lucchi A. 2009. Synthetic grape volatiles attract mated Lobesia botrana females in laboratory and field bioassays. J Chem Ecol. 35(9):1054-1062.
2. Bruce TJA, Wadhams LJ, Woodcock CM. 2005. Insect host location: a volatile situation. Trends Plant Sci. 10(6):269-274.
3. Calas D, Thiery D, Marion-Poll F. 2006. 20-Hydroxyecdysone deters oviposition and larval feeding in the European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana. J Chem Ecol. 32(11):2443-2454.
4. Eichhorn KW, Lorenz DH. 1977. Phänologishche Enwicklungsstadien der Rebe. Nachrichtenbl Dtsch Pflanzenschutzdienstes (Braunschweig). 29: 119-120.
5. Gilbert C, Kuenen LPS. 2008. Multimodal integration: visual cues help odorseeking fruit flies. Curr Biol. 18(7):295-297.
6. Harris MO, Foster SP. 1995. Behaviour and integration. In: Cardé C, Bell W, editors. Chemical ecology of insects 2. New York: Chapman & Hall. p. 3-46.
7. Harris MO, Miller JR. 1988. Host-acceptance behavior in an herbivorous fly, Delia Antiqua. J Insect Physiol. 34(3):179-190.
8. Holopainen JK. 2008. Importance of olfactory and visual signals of autumn leaves in the coevolution of aphids and trees. Bioessays. 30(9):889-896.
9. Honda K. 1995. Chemical basis of differential oviposition by lepidopterous insects. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 30:1-23.
10. Hurtrel B, Thiery D. 1999. Modulation of flight activity in Lobesia botrana Den. & Schiff. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) females studied in a wind tunnel. J Insect Behav. 12(2):199-211.
11. Kanno H, Harris MO. 2000. Leaf physical and chemical features influence selection of plant genotypes by Hessian fly. J Chem Ecol. 26(10): 2335-2354.
12. Lombarkia N, Derridj S. 2002. Incidence of apple fruit and leaf surface metabolites on Cydia pomonella oviposition. Entomol Exp Appl. 104(1):79-87.
13. Lombarkia N, Derridj S. 2008. Resistance of apple trees to Cydia pomonella egg-laying due to leaf surface metabolites. Entomol Exp Appl. 128(1): 57-65.
14. Maher N, Thiery D. 2004a. A bioassay to evaluate the activity of chemical stimuli from grape berries on the oviposition of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Bull Entomol Res. 94(1):27-33.
15. Maher N, Thiery D. 2004b. Distribution of chemo- and mechanoreceptors on the tarsi and ovipositor of female European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana. Entomol Exp Appl. 110(2):135-143.
16. Maher N, Thiery D. 2006. Daphne gnidium, a possible native host plant of the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana, stimulates its oviposition. Is a host shift relevant? Chemoecology. 16(3):135-144.
17. Maher N, Thiery D, Stadler E. 2006. Oviposition by Lobesia botrana is stimulated by sugars detected by contact chemoreceptors. Physiol Entomol. 31(1):14-22.
18. Masante-Roca I, Anton S, Delbac L, Dufour MC, Gadenne C. 2007. Attraction of the grapevine moth to host and non-host plant parts in the wind tunnel: effects of plant phenology, sex, and mating status. Entomol Exp Appl. 122(3):239-245.
19. Moreau J, Rahme J, Benrey B, Thiery D. 2008. Larval host plant origin modifies the adult oviposition preference of the female European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana. Naturwissenschaften. 95(4):317-324.
20. Muller C, Riederer M. 2005. Plant surface properties in chemical ecology. J Chem Ecol. 31(11):2621-2651.
21. Raguso RA, Willis MA. 2002. Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by naive hawkmoths, Manduca sexta. Anim Behav. 64: 685-695.
22. R Development Core Team. 2004. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
23. Renwick JAA, Chew FS. 1994. Oviposition behavior in Lepidoptera. Ann Rev Entomol. 39:377-400.
24. Roessingh P, Xu S, Menken SBJ. 2007. Olfactory receptors on the maxillary palps of small ermine moth larvae: evolutionary history of benzaldehyde sensitivity. J Comp Physiol A. 193:635-647.
25. Rojas JC, Virgen A, Cruz-Lopez L. 2003. Chemical and tactile cues influencing oviposition of a generalist moth, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ Entomol. 32(6):1386-1392.
26. Sambaraju KR, Phillips TW. 2008. Effects of physical and chemical factors on oviposition by Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 101(5):955-963.
27. Sato S, Soga T, Nishioka T, Tomita M. 2004. Simultaneous determination of the main metabolites in rice leaves using capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry and capillary electrophoresis diode array detection. Plant J. 40(1):151-163.
28. Schoonhoven LM, van Loon JJA, Dicke M. 2005. Insect-plant biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Slinker BK. 1998. The statistics of synergism. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 30(4): 723-731.
30. Stadler E, Reifenrath K. 2009. Glucosinolates on the leaf surface perceived by insect herbivores: review of ambiguous results and new investigations. Phytochem Rev. 8(1):207-225.
31. Talsma JHR, Biere A, Harvey JA, van Nouhuys S. 2008. Oviposition cues for a specialist butterfly-plant chemistry and size. J Chem Ecol. 34(9): 1202-1212.
32. Tasin M, Anfora G, Bäckman A, Ioriatti C, De Cristofaro A, Pozzolini E, Leonardelli E, Lucchi A. 2008. Grape volatiles drive the oviposition of the vine moth females at a close range. IOBC WPRS Bull. 36:351-353.
33. Tasin M, Anfora G, Ioriatti C, Carlin S, De Cristofaro A, Schmidt S, Bengtsson M, Versini G, Witzgall P. 2005. Antennal and behavioral responses of grapevine moth Lobesia botrana females to volatiles from grapevine. J Chem Ecol. 31(1):77-87.
34. Tasin M, Anfora G, Leonardelli E, Ioriatti C, Lucchi A, De Cristofaro A, Pertot I. 2009. A bioassay-based approach for the evaluation of host- plant cues as oviposition stimuli in grapevine moth. IOBC WPRS Bull. 41:83-86.
35. Tasin M, Bäckman AC, Anfora G, Carlin S, Ioriatti C, Witzgall P. 2010. Attraction of female grapevine moth to common and specific olfactory cues from two host plants. Chem Senses. 35:57-64.
36. Tasin M, Backman AC, Bengtsson M, Varela N, Ioriatti C, Witzgall P. 2006. Wind tunnel attraction of grapevine moth females, Lobesia botrana, to natural and artificial grape odour. Chemoecology. 16(2):87-92.
37. Tasin M, Backman AC, Coracini M, Casado D, Ioriatti C, Witzgall P. 2007. Synergism and redundancy in a plant volatile blend attracting grapevine moth females. Phytochemistry. 68(2):203-209.
38. Thiery D, Gabel B, Farkas P, Pronier V. 1992. Identification of an ovipositionregulating pheromone in the European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). Experientia. 48(7):697-699.
39. Varandas S, Teixeira MJ, Marques JC, Aguiar A, Alves A, Bastos M. 2004. Glucose and fructose levels on grape skin: interference in Lobesia botrana behaviour. Anal Chim Acta. 513(1):351-355.