Standpoints: The disciplined interdisciplinarity of writing studies

Research in the Teaching of English

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 8-21

  Bazerman, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051716274     PISSN: 0034527X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. BAZERMAN, C. (1981). What written knowledge does: Three examples of academic discourse. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 361-88.
2. BAZERMAN, C. (1987). Codifying the social scientific style: The APA Publication Manual as a Behaviorist Rhetoric. In J. Nelson, A. Megill, & D. McCloskey (Eds.), The rhetoric of the human sciences (pp. 125-144). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. BAZERMAN, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
4. BAZERMAN, C. (1993). Forums of validation and forms of knowledge: The magical rhetoric of Otto von Guericke's sulfur globe. Configurations, 1, 201-228.
5. BAZERMAN, C. (1994). Constructing experience. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
6. BAZERMAN, C. (1999). The languages of Edison's light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. BAZERMAN, C. (2001). Nuclear information: One rhetorical moment in the construction of the information age. Written Communication, 18, 259-295.
8. BAZERMAN, C. (2003). Textual performance: Where the action at a distance is. JAC: Journal of Advanced Composition, 23, 379-396.
9. BAZERMAN, C. (2004). Intertextualities: Volosinov, Bakhtin, literary theory, and literacy studies. In A. Ball & S. W. Freedman (Eds.), Bakhtinian perspectives on languages, literacy, and learning (pp. 53-65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. BAZERMAN, C. (2005). Practically human: The pragmatist project of the interdisciplinary journal Psychiatry. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 1(2), 15-38.
11. BAZERMAN, C. (2008). Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text. London: Routledge.
12. BAZERMAN, C. (2009a). How does science come to speak in the courts? Citations, intertexts, expert witnesses, consequential facts and reasoning. Law and Contemporary Problems, 72(1), 91-120.
13. BAZERMAN, C. (2009b). Genre and cognitive development. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 279-294). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press and WAC Clearinghouse.
14. BAZERMAN, C., & DE LOS SANTOS, R. A. (2005). Measuring incommensurability: Are toxicology and ecotoxicology blind to what the other sees? In R. Harris (Ed.), Rhetoric and Incommensurability (pp. 424-463). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
15. BAZERMAN, C., LITTLE, J., & CHAVKIN, T. (2003). The production of information for genred activity spaces. Written Communication, 20, 455-477.
16. BEARD, R., MYHILL, D., RILEY, D., & NYSTRAND, M. (EDS.). (2009), The SAGE handbook of writing development. London: SAGE.
17. BOURDIEU, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. COLE, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. COLLINS, H. (1983). The sociology of scientific knowledge. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 265-85.
20. COLLINS, H. (1985). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
21. DEAR, P. (1985). Totius in verba: Rhetoric and authority in the early royal society. Isis, 76, 145-161.
22. DEAR, P. (ED.). (1991). The literary structure of scientific argument: Historical studies. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
23. DENZIN, N. K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Chicago: Aldine.
24. ENGESTROM, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
25. FISH, S. (1989). Being interdisciplinary is so very hard to do. Profession, 89, 15-22.
26. FLOWER, L., & HAYES, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
27. GIDDENS, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
28. HERITAGE, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. New York: Polity Press.
29. KELLY, G., & BAZERMAN, C. (2003). How students argue scientific claims: A rhetorical-semantic analysis. Applied Linguistics, 24, 28-55. (Pubitemid 36188900)
30. KELLY, G. J., BAZERMAN, C., SKUKAUSKAITE, A., & PROTHERO, W. (2009). Rhetorical features of student science writing in introductory university oceanography. In C. Bazerman, B. Krut, S. McLeod, S. Null, P. Rogers, & A. Stansell (Eds.), Traditions of writing research (pp. 265-282). London: Taylor & Francis.
31. KLEIN, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
32. KNORR-CETINA, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
33. LATOUR, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. LATOUR, B., & WOOLGAR, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University press.
35. MACARTHUR, C., GRAHAM, S., & FITZGERALD, J. (2005). Handbook of writing research. New York: Guilford.
36. MERTON, R. (1973). The sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. MOSS, B. J. (1992). Ethnography and composition: Studying language at home. In G. Kirsch & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Methods and methodology in composition research (pp. 153-171). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press
38. SCHUTZ, A. (1967). The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
39. SCHUTZ, A., & LUCKMANN, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
40. SHAPIN, S., & SCHAFFER, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41. SMAGORINSKY, P. (2006) Research on composition: Multiple perspectives on two decades of change. New York: Teachers College Press.
42. WALLERSTEIN, I. (1996). Open the social sciences. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.