Ranking farms with a composite indicator of sustainability

Agricultural Economics

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 561-575

  Reig Martínez, Ernest ^a,b   Gómez Limón, José A ^c   Picazo Tadeo, Andrés J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b University of Valencia   (Spain)

^c IFAPA CENTRO EL TORUÑO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Agriculture; C61; D60; Data envelopment analysis; H41; Multicriteria decision making; Q10; Spain; Sustainability index

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE; AGRICULTURAL POLICY; AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH; ARID REGION; BOOTSTRAPPING; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DATABASE; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; FARM SIZE; FARMERS ATTITUDE; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; PLATEAU; POLICY MAKING; RANKING; SUSTAINABILITY;

SPAIN;

EID: 80051689335     PISSN: 01695150     EISSN: 15740862     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00536.x     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Adler, N., Friedman, L., Sinuany-Stern, Z., 2002. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 140(2), 49-265.
2. Adler, N., Golany, B., 2002. Including principal components weights to improve discrimination in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 53(9), 985-991.
3. Álvarez, A., Arias, C., 2004. Technical efficiency and farm size: A conditional analysis. Agric. Econ. 30(3), 241-250.
4. Andersen, E., Elbersen, B., Godeschalk, F., Verhoog, D., 2007. Farm management indicators and farm typologies as a basis for assessments in a changing policy environment. J. Environ. Manag. 82(3), 353-362.
5. Andersen, P., Petersen, N.C., 1993. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 39(10), 1261-1264.
6. André, F.J., Herrero, I., Riesgo, L., 2010. A modified DEA model to estimate the importance of objectives with an application to agricultural economics. Omega 38, 371-382.
7. Angulo-Meza, L., Estellita-Lins, M.P., 2002. Review of methods for increasing discrimination in data envelopment analysis. Ann. Oper. Res. 116(1-4), 225-242.
8. Atance, I., Barreiro, J., 2006. CAP MTR versus environmentally targeted agricultural policy in marginal arable areas: Impact analysis combining simulation and survey data. Agric. Econ. 34(3), 303-313.
9. Atance, I., Gómez-Limón, J.A., Barreiro, J., 2006. El reto de la multifuncionalidad agraria: Oferta de bienes privados y públicos en el Sur de Palencia. Revista Española de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros 210, 155-200.
10. Becker, B., 1997. Sustainability assessment: A review of values, concepts, and methodological approaches. Issues in Agriculture n. 10. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR)-World Bank, Washington
11. Böhringer, C., Jochem, P.E.P., 2007. Measuring the immeasurable-A survey of sustainability indices. Ecol. Econ. 63(1), 1-8.
12. Burton, R.J.F., Walford, N.S., 2005. Multiple succession on family farms in the South East of England: A counterbalance to agricultural concentration? J. Rural Stud. 21(3), 335-347.
13. Cahill, C., Hill, B., 2005. Policies affecting or facilitating resource adjustment in agriculture in the European Union. In: Blandford, D., Hill, B. (Eds.), Policy Reform and Agricultural Adjustment in the Agricultural Sectors of Developed Countries. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK
14. Callens, I., Tyteca, D., 1999. Towards indicators of sustainable development for firms. A productive efficiency perspective. Ecol. Econ. 28(1), 41-53.
15. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(6), 429-449.
16. Chen, Y.-W., Larbani, M., Chang, Y.-P., 2009. Multiobjective data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 60(11), 1556-1566.
17. Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., van Puyenbroek, T., 2007. An introduction to 'benefit of the doubt' composite indicators. Soc. Indic. Res. 82(1), 111-145.
18. Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., van Puyenbroeck, T., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Liska, R., Tarantola, S., 2008. Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: The case of the Technology Achievement Index. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 59(2), 239-251.
19. Cohon, J.L., 1978. Multiobjective Programming and Planning. Academic Press, New York
20. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Tone, K., 2007. Data Envelopment Analysis. A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. Springer-Business Media - LCC, New York
21. Despotis, D.K., 2002. Improving the discriminating power of DEA: Focus on globally efficient units. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 53(3), 314-323.
22. Despotis, D.K., 2005. A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56(8), 969-980.
23. Díaz, C., 2006. Cambios generacionales en las estrategias de inserción sociolaboral de las jóvenes rurales. Revista Española de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros 211, 307-338.
24. Diaz-Balteiro, L., Romero, C., 2004. In search of a natural systems sustainability index. Ecol. Econ. 49(3), 401-405.
25. Ebert, U., Welsch, H., 2004. Meaningful environmental indices: A social choice approach. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 47(2), 270-283.
26. EEA (European Environment Agency), 2005. Agriculture and Environment in EU-15 - The IRENA Indicator Report. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen
27. Friedman, L., Sinuany-Stern, Z., 1997. Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis and the data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 100(3), 629-637.
28. Golany, B., 1988. An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of DEA to effectiveness analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 39(8), 725-734.
29. Gómez-Benito, C., González, J.J., Sancho-Hazak, R., 1999. Identidad y profesión en la agricultura familiar. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Madrid
30. Gómez-Limón, J.A., Sanchez-Fernandez, G., 2010. Empirical evaluation of agricultural sustainability using composite indicators. Ecol. Econ. 69(5), 1062-1075.
31. Hansen, J.W., 1996. Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept? Agric. Syst. 50(1), 117-143.
32. Hodge, I. 2000. Agri-environmental relationships and the choice of policy mechanism. World Econ. 23(2), 257-273.
33. Jolliffe, I.T., 2002. Principal Components Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York
34. Joro, T., Korhonen, P., Wallenius, J., 1998. Structural comparison of data envelopment analysis and multiple objective linear programming. Manage. Sci. 44(7), 962-970.
35. Kallas, Z., Gómez-Limón, J.A., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., 2007. Decomposing the value of agricultural multifunctionality: Combining contingent valuation and the analytical hierarchy process. J. Agric. Econ. 58(2), 218-241.
36. Kao, C., Hung, H.-T., 2005. Data envelopment analysis with common weights: The compromise solution approach. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56(10), 1196-1203.
37. Karagiannis, G., Sarris, A., 2005. Measuring and explaining scale efficiency with the parametric approach: The case of Greek tobacco growers. Agric. Econ. 33(3), 441-451.
38. Lam, K.F., 2010. In the determination of weight sets to compute cross-efficiency ratios in DEA. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 61(1), 134-143.
39. Latacz-Lohmann, U., Hodge, I., 2003. European agri-environmental policy for the 21st century. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 47(1), 123-139.
40. Li, X.-B., Reeves, G.R., 1999. A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 115(3), 507-517.
41. Lovell, C.A.K., Pastor, J.T., Turner, J.A., 1995. Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: A comparison of European and non-European countries. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 87(3), 507-518.
42. Moreno-Pérez, O.M., Muñoz, C., 2007. Aspectos territoriales del proceso de ajuste en las llanuras cerealistas castellano-leonesas. In: Arnalte, E. (Ed.), Políticas agrarias y ajuste estructural en la agricultura española. Serie Estudios. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, Madrid
43. Moreno-Pérez, O.M., Ortiz-Miranda, D., 2008. Understanding structural adjustment in Spanish arable crop farms: Policies, technology and multifunctionality. Span. J. Agric. Res. 6(2), 153-165.
44. Nahra, T.A., Mendez, D., Alexander, J.A., 2009. Employing super-efficiency analysis as an alternative to DEA: An application in outpatient substance abuse treatment. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 196(3), 1097-1106.
45. Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., Giovannini, E., 2008. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. Joint Research Center - OECD, Paris
46. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2001. Environmental Indicators for Agriculture. Volume 3: Methods and Results. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris
47. Pacini, C., Wossink, A., Giesen, G., Vazzana, C., Huirne, R., 2003. Evaluation of sustainability of organic, integrated and conventional farming systems: A farm and field-scale analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 95(1), 273-288.
48. Palacín, C., Alonso, J.C., Martín, C.A., Alonso, J.A., Magaña, M., Martín, B., 2003. Avutarda común. In: Martí, R., Moral J.C. (Eds.), Atlas de las aves reproductoras de España. D.G. Conservación de la Naturaleza-SEO, Madrid
49. Pannell, D.J., Glenn, N.A., 2000. A framework for the economic evaluation and selection of sustainability indicators in agriculture. Ecol. Econ. 33(1), 135-149.
50. Picazo-Tadeo, A.J., García-Reche, A., 2007. What makes environmental performance differ between firms? Empirical evidence from the Spanish tile industry. Environ. Plan. A 39(9), 2232-2247.
51. Picazo-Tadeo, A.J., Reig-Martínez, E., Estruch, V., 2009, Farming efficiency and the survival of valuable agro-ecosystems: A case study of rice farming in European Mediterranean wetlands. Open Environ. Sci. 3, 69-78.
52. Phillips, J.M., 1994. Farmer education and farmer efficiency: A meta-analysis. Econ. Devel. Cult. Change 43(1), 149-165.
53. Podinovski, V.V., Thanassoulis, E., 2007. Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis: Some practical suggestions. J. Prod. Anal. 28(1), 117-126.
54. Raman, S., 2006. Agricultural Sustainability. Principles, Processes and Prospects. Haworth Press, Binghamton, NY
55. Rao, N.H., Rogers, P.P., 2006. Assessment of agricultural sustainability. Curr. Sci. 91(4), 439-448.
56. Reig, E., Aznar, J., Estruch, V., 2010. A comparative analysis of the sustainability of rice cultivation technologies using the analytic network process. Span. J. Agric. Res. 8(2), 273-284.
57. Rigby, D., Woodhouse, P.H., Young, T., Burton, M., 2001. Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice. Ecol. Econ. 39(3), 463-478.
58. Romero, C., 1996. Multicriteria decision analysis and environmental economics: An approximation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 96(1), 81-89.
59. Russillo, A., Pintér, L., 2009. Linking farm-level measurement systems to environmental sustainability outcomes: Challenges and ways forward. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
60. Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York
61. Saaty, T.L., 2001. Decision Making for Leaders. The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
62. Sanchez-Fernandez, G., 2009. Análisis de sostenibilidad agraria mediante indicadores sintéticos: Aplicación empírica para sistemas agrarios de Castilla y León. Ph.D. dissertation. Polytechnic University of Madrid, Madrid
63. Sarkis, J., 2000. A comparative analysis of DEA as a discrete alternative multiple criteria decision tool. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 123(3), 543-557.
64. Sauvenier, X., Valckx, J., Van Cauwenbergh, N., Wauters, E., Bachev, H., Biala, K., Bielders, C., Brouckaert, V., Garcia-Cidad, V., Goyens, S., Hermy, M., Mathijs, E., Muys, B., Van-clooster, M., Peeters, A., 2006. Framework for assessing sustainability levels in Belgian agricultural systems - SAFE. Final Report - SPSD II CP 28. Belgian Science Policy, Brussels
65. Sexton, T.R., 1986. The methodology of data envelopment analysis. In: Silkman, R.H. (Ed.), Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, New Directions for Program Evaluation. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA
66. Sexton, T.T., Silkman, R.H., Hogan, A., 1986. Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. In: Silkman, R.H. (Ed.), Measuring efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, New Directions for Program Evaluation. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA
67. Shang, J., Sueyoshi, T., 1995. A unified framework for the selection of a flexible manufacturing system. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 85(2), 297-315.
68. Shephard, R.W., 1970. Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton
69. Silva-Portela, M.C., Thanassoulis, E., 2006. Zero weights and non-zero slacks: Different solutions to the same problem. Ann. Oper. Res. 145(1), 129-147.
70. Simar, L., Wilson, P.W., 2007. Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. J. Econometrics 136(1), 31-64.
71. Sinuany-Stern, Z., Friedman, L., 1998. DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 111(3), 470-478.
72. Stewart, T.J., 1996. Relationships between data envelopment analysis and multicriteria decision analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 47(5), 654-665.
73. Suárez, F., Naveso, M.A., De Juana, E., 1997. Farming in the drylands of Spain: Birds of the pseudosteppes. In: Pain, D.J., Pienkowski, M.W. (Eds.), Farming and Birds in Europe: The Common Agricultural Policy and its Implications for Bird Conservation. Academic Press, San Diego, CA
74. Tone, K., 2002. A slack-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 143(1), 32-41.
75. Torgersen, A.M., Forsund, F.R., Kittelsen, S.A.C., 1996. Slack adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units. J. Prod. Anal. 7(4), 379-398.
76. UNDP (United Nations Development Program), 1990. Human Development Report 1990. Oxford University Press, New York
77. Van Der Werf, H.M.G., Petit, J., 2002. Evaluation of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: A comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 93(1), 131-145.
78. Van Passel, S., Nevens, F., Mathijs, E., van Huylenbroeck, G., 2007. Measuring farm sustainability and explaining differences in sustainable efficiency. Ecol. Econ. 62(1), 149-161.
79. Van Wenum, J., Buys, J., Wossink, A., 1999. Nature quality indicators in agriculture. In: Brouwer, F., Crabtree, B. (Eds.), Environmental Indicators and Agricultural Policy, CABI Publishing, Wallingford
80. Vanslembrouck, I., van Huylenbroeck, G., Verbeke, W., 2002. Determinants of the willingness of Belgian farmers to participate in agri-environmental measures. J. Agric. Econ. 51(3), 489-511.
81. Valentinov, V., 2007. Why are cooperatives important in agriculture? An organizational economics perspective. J. Inst. Econ. 3(1), 55-69.
82. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987. Our Common Future. The Brundtland Report. Oxford University Press, Oxford
83. Zeleny, M., 1974. A concept of compromise solutions and the method of the displaced ideal. Comput. Oper. Res. 1, 479-496.
84. Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., Poh, K.L., 2007. A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators. Ecol. Econ. 62(2), 291-297.
85. Zohrehbandian, M., Makui, A., Alinezhad, A., 2009. A compromise solution approach for finding common weights in DEA: An improvement to Kao and Hung's approach. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 61(4), 604-610.