A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators

Ecological Economics

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 291-297

  Zhou, P ^a   Ang, B W ^a   Poh, K L ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Aggregation; Composite indicators; Data envelopment analysis; Sustainable energy development; Weighting

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; ENERGY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; POLICY ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WEIGHT;

EID: 34247174291     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.020     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allen R., Athanassopoulos A., Dyson R.G., and Thanassoulis E. Weights restrictions and value judgements: evolution, development and future directions. Annals of Operation Research 73 (1997) 13-34
2. Ang B.W. Monitoring changes in economy-wide energy efficiency: from energy-GDP ratio to composite efficiency index. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 574-582
3. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). APEC Energy Statistics 2003 (2005), APEC, Tokyo
4. Boyd G.A., and Pang J.X. Estimating the linkage between energy efficiency and productivity. Energy Policy 28 (2000) 289-296
5. Callens I., and Tyteca D. Towards indicators of sustainable development for firms: a productive efficiency perspective. Ecological Economics 28 (1999) 41-53
6. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., and Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 (1978) 429-444
7. Cherchye L. Using data envelopment analysis to assess macroeconomic policy performance. Applied Economics 33 (2001) 407-416
8. Cherchye, L., Lovell, C.A.K., Moesen, W., van Puyenbroeck, T., in press. One market, one number? A composite indicator assessment of EU internal market dynamics. European Economic Review. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.03.011.
9. Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., van Puyenbroeck, T., in press-b. An introduction to 'benefit of the doubt' composite indicators. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-006-9029-7.
10. Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., and Tone T. Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With DEA-Solver Software and References (2006), Springer, New York
11. Despotis D.K. Measuring human development via data envelopment analysis: the case of Asia and the Pacific. Omega 33 (2005) 385-390
12. Despotis D.K. A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 56 (2005) 969-980
13. Diaz-Balteiro L., and Romero C. In search of a natural systems sustainability index. Ecological Economics 49 (2004) 401-405
14. Ebert U., and Welsch H. Meaningful environmental indices: a social choice approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47 (2004) 270-283
15. Esty D.C., Levy M.A., Srebotnjak T., de Sherbinin A., Kim C.H., and Anderson B. Pilot Environmental Performance Index (2006), Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, New Haven
16. Färe R., Grosskopf S., and Hernández-Sancho F. Environmental performance: an index number approach. Resource and Energy Economics 26 (2004) 343-352
17. Hajkowicz S. Multi-attributed environmental index construction. Ecological Economics 57 (2006) 122-139
18. Hope C., Parker J., and Peake S. A pilot environmental index for the UK in the 1980s. Energy Policy 20 (1992) 335-343
19. Hu J.L., and Wang S.C. Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 3206-3217
20. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Energy Indicators for Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies. IAEA, Vienna. Available at (2005). http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1222_web.pdf
21. Jefferson M. Sustainable energy development: performance and prospects. Renewable Energy 31 (2006) 571-582
22. Krajnc D., and Glavič P. How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainability. Ecological Economics 55 (2005) 551-563
23. Lau K.N., and Lam P.Y. Economic freedom ranking of 161 countries in year 2000: a minimum disagreement approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society 53 (2002) 664-671
24. Lovell C.A.K., Pastor J.T., and Turner J.A. Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: a comparison of European and non-European countries. European Journal of Operational Research 87 (1995) 507-518
25. Mahlberg B., and Obersteiner M. Remeasuring the HDI by data envelopment analysis. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Interim Report IR-01-069, Laxemburg, Austria. Available at (2001). http://www.iiasa.ac.at/publications/Documents/IR-01%1E069.pdf
26. Munda G. Measuring sustainability: a multi-criterion framework. Environment, Development and Sustainability 7 (2005) 117-134
27. Munda G., and Nardo M. On the methodological foundations of composite indicators used for ranking countries. Proceeding of the First OECD/JRC Workshop on Composite Indicators of Country performance (2003), JRC, Ispra
28. Nardo M., Saisana M., Saltelli A., Tarantola S., Hoffman A., and Giovannini E. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD Statistics Working Paper 2005/3 (2005). http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2005doc.nsf/LinkTo/std-doc(2005)3 Available at: http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2005doc.nsf/LinkTo/std-doc(2005)3
29. Raab R., Kotamraju P., and Haag S. Efficient provision of child quality of life in less developed countries: conventional development indexes versus a programming approach to develop indexes. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 34 (2000) 51-67
30. 2 emissions: a cross-country comparison. International Journal of Global Energy Issues 17 (2002) 214-227
31. Ramanathan R. An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis: A Tool for Performance Measurement (2003), Sage Publications, New Delhi
32. Ramanathan R. An analysis of energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in countries of the Middle East and North Africa. Energy 30 (2005) 2831-2842
33. Ramanathan R. Evaluating the comparative performance of countries of the Middle East and North Africa: a DEA application. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 40 (2006) 156-167
34. Ramanathan R. ABC inventory classification with multiple-criteria using weighted linear optimization. Computers & Operations Research 33 (2006) 695-700
35. Sagar A.D., and Najam A. The human development index: a critical review. Ecological Economics 25 (1998) 249-264
36. Saisana M., Saltelli A., and Tarantola S. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 168 (2005) 307-323
37. Takamura Y., and Tone K. A comparative site evaluation study for relocating Japanese government agencies out of Tokyo. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 37 (2003) 85-102
38. US Energy Information Administration. International Energy Annual 2003. Available at (2005). http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/iea/wecbtu.html
39. Wong Y.H.B., and Beasley J.E. Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 41 (1990) 829-835
40. World Resources Institute. Climate Analysis Indicators Tool (CAIT)-Excel (version 3.0). Washington, DC. Available at (2005). http://cait.wri.org
41. Zaim O. Measuring environmental performance of state manufacturing through changes in pollution intensities: a DEA framework. Ecological Economics 48 (2004) 37-47
42. Zhou P., Ang B.W., and Poh K.L. Comparing aggregating methods for constructing the composite environmental index: an objective measure. Ecological Economics 59 (2006) 305-311
43. Zhou P., Ang B.W., and Poh K.L. Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance. Ecological Economics 60 (2006) 111-118
44. Zhou P., Poh K.L., and Ang B.W. A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance. European Journal of Operational Research 178 (2007) 1-9
45. Zhu J. A buyer-seller game model for selection and negotiation of purchasing bids: extensions and new models. European Journal of Operational Research 154 (2004) 150-156