The use of debonding microspheres in electrothermal debonding

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 407-412

  Swinburne, Marissa Louise ^a   Willmot, Derrick ^a   Patrick, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MICROSPHERE; POLYMER; RELY A BOND SYSTEM; RESIN CEMENT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL PROCEDURE; ELECTRICITY; ENAMEL; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CEMENTATION; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSPHERES; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; POLYMERS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 80051685358     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq091     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bishara S E, Trulove T S 1990 Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part I. Background and methods. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 98: 145-153
2. Crooks M, Hood J, Harkness M 1997 Thermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 111: 163-172
3. Eliades T, Brantley W A 2000 The inappropriateness of conventional bond strength assessment protocols. European Journal of Orthodontics 22: 13-23
4. Houston W J B 1983 The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics 83: 382-390
5. Jost-Brinkmann P G, Stein H, Miethke R R, Nakata M 1992 Histologic investigation of the human pulp after thermodebonding of metal and ceramic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 102: 410-417
6. Jost-Brinkmann P G, Radlanski R J, Rtun J, Loidl H 1997 Risk of pulp damage due to temperature increase during thermodebonding of ceramic brackets. European Journal of Orthodontics 19: 623-628
7. Kearns H P O, Sandham J A, Jones W B, Lagerström L 1997 Electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an ex vivo study. British Journal of Orthodontics 24: 237-242
8. Kraut J, Radin S, Trowbridge H I, Emling R C, Yankell S C 1991 Clinical evaluations on thermal versus mechanical debonding of ceramic brackets. Journal of Clinical Dentistry 2: 92-96
9. Lisanti V F, Zander H A 1952 Thermal injury to normal dog teeth: in vivo measurements of pulp temperature increases and their effect on the pulp tissue. Journal of Dental Research 31: 548-558
10. Littlewood S J, Redhead A 1998 Use of jigs to standardise orthodontic bond testing. Journal of Dentistry 26: 539-545
11. Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T 1983 Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. Journal of Dental Research 62: 1076-1081
12. Oesterle L J, Shellhart W C, Belanger G K 1998 The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 113: 514-519
13. Rueggeberg F A, Lockwood P E 1990 Thermal debracketing of orthodontic resins. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 98: 56-65
14. Sheridan J J, Brawley G, Hastings J 1986 Electrothermal debracketing. Part I. An in vitro study. American Journal of Orthodontics 89: 21-27
15. Sunna S, Rock W P 1998 Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomised clinical trial. British Journal of Orthodontics 25: 283-287