Unraveling the myth of meritocracy within the context of US higher education

Higher Education

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 383-397

  Liu, Amy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Access; Admissions; Distributive justice; Equality of opportunity; Higher education; Merit; Meritocracy; Social mobility

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051670321     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-010-9394-7     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Altbach, P. G. (2001). The American academic model in comparative perspective. In P. G. Altbach, P. J. Gumport, & D. B. Johnstone (Eds.), In defense of American higher education (pp. 11-37). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
2. Antonio, A. L., Chang, M. J., Hakuta, K., Kenny, D. A., Levin, S., & Milem, J. F. (2004). Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students. Psychological Science, 15, 507-510.
3. Arenson, K. W. (2008, January 17). Applications to colleges are breaking records [Electronic Version]. The New York Times. Retrieved December 7, 2008, from http://www. nytimes. com/2008/01/17/education/17admissions. html?_r=1.
4. Avery, C., Fairbanks, A., & Zeckhauser, R. (2004). The early admissions game: Joining the elite. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Baez, B. (2006). Merit and difference. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 996-1016.
6. Bartlett, L. (2006, September 28). UCLA adopts holistic approach to reviewing freshman applications. Retrieved August 4, 2010, from http://www. universityofcalifornia. edu/news/article/8541.
7. Baum, S., & Ma, J. (2007). Education pays: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. Washington, DC: College Board.
8. Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
9. Bills, D. B. (2003). Credentials, signals, and screens: Explaining the relationship between schooling and job assignment. Review of Educational Research, 73(4), 441-469.
10. Bracco, K. R., & Callan, P. M. (2002). Competition and collaboration in California higher education. San Jose, CA: The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.
11. Brint, S., & Karabel, J. (1989). The diverted dream: Community colleges and the promise of educational opportunity in America, 1900-1985. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Buchmann, C., Roscigno, V. J., & Condron, D. J. (2006, August). The myth of meritocracy? SAT preparation, college enrollment, class and race in the United States. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
13. California Postsecondary Education Commission. (2008). California colleges and universities, 2008: A guide to California's degree-granting institutions and degree, certificate, and credential programs. Sacramento, CA: California Postsecondary Education Commission.
14. Chang, M. J. (1999). Does racial diversity matter? The educational impact of a racially diverse undergraduate population. Journal of College Student Development, 75, 105-126.
15. Clark, B. R. (1960). The "cooling-out" function in higher education. The American Journal of Sociology, 65(6), 569-576.
16. Collins, R. (2002). Credential inflation and the future of universities. In S. Brint (Ed.), The future of the city of intellect: The changing American university (pp. 23-46). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17. Conrad, T. R. (1976). The debate about quota systems: An analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 20(1), 135-149.
18. Daniels, N. (1978). Merit and meritocracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 7(3), 206-223.
19. Domina, T. (2009). What works in college outreach: Assessing targeted and schoolwide interventions for disadvantaged students. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(2), 127-152.
20. Dougherty, K. J. (1994). The contradictory college: The conflicting origins, impacts, and futures of the community college. Albany: State University of New York Press.
21. Douglass, J. A. (1998). Shared governance at the University of California: An historical review. Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley. Retrieved August 4, 2010, from http://www. escholarship. org/uc/item/07q345d0.
22. Douglass, J. A. (2007). The conditions for admission: Access, equity, and the social contract of public universities. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
23. Dowd, A. C. (2003). From access to outcome equity: Revitalizing the democratic mission of the community college. Annals of the American Academy of Political and SocialScience, 586(March), 92-119.
24. Dowd, A. C., Cheslock, J. J., & Melguizo, T. (2008). Transfer access from community colleges and the distribution of elite higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(4), 442-472.
25. Eckel, P. D., & King, J. E. (2004). An overview of higher education in the United States: Diversity, access, and the role of the marketplace. Retrieved January 11, 2007, from http://www. acenet. edu/bookstore/pdf/2004_higher_ed_overview. pdf.
26. Eide, E., Brewer, D. J., & Ehrenberg, R. G. (1998). Does it pay to attend an elite private college? Evidence on the effects of undergraduate college quality on graduate school attendance. Economics of Education Review, 17(4), 371-376.
27. Entwistle, H. (1977). Class, culture and education. London: Methuen.
28. Espenshade, T. J., Hale, L. E., & Chung, C. Y. (2005). The frog pond revisited: High school academic context, class rank, and elite college admission. Sociology of Education, 78, 269-293.
29. Geiger, R. L. (2002). The competition for high-ability students: Universities in a key marketplace. In S. Brint (Ed.), The future of the city of knowledge: The changing American university (pp. 82-106). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30. Golden, D. (2006). The price of admission: How America's ruling class buys its way into elite colleges-and who gets left outside the gates. New York: Crown Publishers.
31. Goyette, K. A. (2008). College for some to college for all: Social background, occupational expectations, and educational expectations over time. Social Science Research, 37(2), 461-484.
32. Gurin, P. (1999). Expert report of Patricia Gurin. The compelling need for diversity in higher education. Gratz et al. v. Bollinger, et al., No. 97-75321 (E. D. Mich.) Grutter et al. v. Bollinger, et al., No. 97-75928 (E. D. Mich.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
33. Gurin, P., Dey, E. L., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Education Review, 72(3), 330-366.
34. Haskins, R. (2008). Education and economic mobility. In J. B. Isaacs, I. V. Sawhill, & R. Haskins (Eds.), Getting ahead or losing ground: Economic mobility in America (pp. 91-104). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
35. Horn, C. L., & Flores, S. M. (2003). Percent plans in college admissions: A comparative analysis of three states' experiences. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project Harvard University.
36. Hossler, D., Braxton, J., & Coopersmith, G. (1989). Understanding student college choice. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. V, pp. 231-288). New York: Agathon Press.
37. Hurtado, S. (2003). Institutional diversity in American higher education. In S. R. Komives, D. B. Woodard Jr, & Associates (Eds.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (4th ed., pp. 23-44). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
38. Husén, T. (1974). Talent, equality and meritocracy: Availability and utilization of talent. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
39. Karabel, J. (2005). The chosen: The hidden history of admission and exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
40. Killgore, L. (2009). Merit and competition in selective college admissions. The Review of Higher Education, 32(4), 469-488.
41. Lapenson, B. P. (2009). Affirmative action and the meanings of merit. New York: University Press of America, Inc.
42. Lemann, N. (1999). The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
43. Liu, A. (2011). The admission industrial complex: Examining the entrepreneurial impact on college access. Journal of College Admission, 2010(Winter 2011), 8-19.
44. Long, B. T., & Kurlaender, M. (2009). Do community colleges provide a viable pathway to a baccalaureate degree? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(1), 30-53.
45. Lucas, C. J. (2006). American higher education: A history (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
46. McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
47. McDonough, P. M. (2005). Counseling matters: Knowledge, assistance, and organizational commitment in college preparation. In W. G. Tierney, Z. B. Corwin, & J. E. Colyar (Eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach (pp. 69-87). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
48. McDonough, P. M., Korn, J., & Yamasaki, E. (1997). Access, equity, and the privatization of college counseling. The Review of Higher Education, 20(3), 297-317.
49. McDonough, P. M., Ventresca, M. J., & Outcalt, C. (2000). Field of dreams: Organization field approaches to understanding the transformation of college access, 1965-1995. In J. C. Smart & W. G. Tierney (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XV, pp. 371-405). New York: Agathon Press.
50. McNamee, S. J., & Miller, R. K., Jr. (2004). The meritocracy myth. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
51. Milem, J. F. (2003). The educational benefits of diversity: Evidence from multiple sectors. In M. J. Chang, D. Witt, J. Jones, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Compelling interest: Examining the evidence on racial dynamics in colleges and universities (pp. 126-169). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
52. Monks, J. (2000). The returns to individual and college characteristics: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Economics of Education Review, 19(3), 279-289.
53. Moore, R. (2004). Education and society: Issues and explanations in the sociology of education. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
54. Norman, R. (1987). Free and equal. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55. Park, J. J., & Eagan Jr., M. K. (2011). Who goes early?: A multi-level analysis of enrolling via early action and early decision admissions. Teachers College Record, 113(11).
56. Park, S., & Pascarella, E. T. (2010). Community college attendance and socioeconomic plans. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 34(9), 700-716.
57. Perna, L. W., Rowan-Kenyon, H. T., Thomas, S. L., Bell, A., Anderson, R., & Li, C. (2008). The role of college counseling in shaping college opportunity: Variations across high schools. The Review of Higher Education, 31(2), 131-159.
58. Perna, L. W., & Swail, W. S. (2001). Pre-college outreach and early intervention. Thought & Action, 17(1), 99-110.
59. Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2006). Relationships among structural diversity, informal peer interaction, and perception of the campus environment. The Review of Higher Education, 29(4), 425-450.
60. Rhoads, R. A., Saenz, V., & Carducci, R. (2005). Higher education reform as a social movement: The case of affirmative action. The Review of Higher Education, 28(2), 191-220.
61. Roemer, J. E. (2000). Equality of opportunity. In K. Arrow, S. Bowles, & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Meritocracy and economic inequality (pp. 17-32). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62. Sandel, M. J. (1998). Liberalism and the limits of justice (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
63. Schultz, J. L., & Mueller, D. (2006). Effectiveness of programs to improve postsecondary education enrollment and success of underrepresented youth: A literature review. St. Paul, MN: Wilder Research.
64. Sen, A. (2000). Merit and justice. In K. Arrow, S. Bowles, & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Meritocracy and economic inequality (pp. 5-16). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65. Smith, D. G., et al. (1997). Diversity works: The emerging picture of how students benefit. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
66. Stevens, M. L. (2007). Creating a class: College admissions and the education of elites. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67. Teranishi, R. T., Ceja, M., Antonio, A. L., Allen, W. R., & McDonough, P. (2004). The college-choice process for Asian Pacific Americans: Ethnicity and socioeconomic class in context. The Review of Higher Education, 27(4), 527-551.
68. Thelin, J. R. (2004). A history of American higher education. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
69. Thomas, S. L., & Zhang, L. (2005). Post-baccalaureate wage growth within 4 years of graduation: The effects of college quality and college major. Research in Higher Education, 46(4), 437-459.
70. Tierney, W. G., & Auerbach, S. (2005). Toward developing an untapped resource: The role of families in college preparation. In W. G. Tierney, Z. B. Corwin, & J. E. Colyar (Eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach (pp. 29-48). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
71. Trow, M. (2001). From mass higher education to universal access: The American advantage. In P. G. Altbach, P. J. Gumport, & D. B. Johnstone (Eds.), In defense of American higher education (pp. 110-143). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
72. Tyre, P. (2008, January 3). Getting in gets harder [Electronic Version]. Newsweek. Retrieved December 7, 2008, from http://www. newsweek. com/id/83159.
73. UC University of California (2009). Freshman admission. Retrieved August 4, 2010, from http://www. universityofcalifornia. edu/admissions/undergrad_adm/paths_to_adm/freshman. html.
74. UCOP University of California Office of the President (2001a, May). SP-1 and SP-2. Retrieved August 4, 2010, from http://www. ucop. edu/ucophome/commserv/factsheets/sp1and2. pdf.
75. UCOP University of California Office of the President (2001b, November). Comprehensive review. Retrieved August 4, 2010, from http://www. ucop. edu/news/factsheets/2001/comprev. pdf.
76. UCOP University of California Office of the President (2007, January). California master plan for higher education: Major features. Retrieved August 4, 2010, from http://ucfuture. universityofcalifornia. edu/documents/ca_masterplan_summary. pdf.
77. UCOP University of California Office of the President (2009, February 5). UC regents adopt changes to freshman eligibility. Retrieved August 4, 2010, from http://www. universityofcalifornia. edu/news/eligibilitychanges/documents/eligibility_factsheet. pdf.
78. Venezia, A., & Kirst, M. W. (2005). Inequitable opportunities: How current education systems and policies undermine the chances for student persistence and success in college. Educational Policy, 19(2), 283-307.
79. Wolniak, G. C., Seifert, T. A., Reed, E. J., & Pascarella, E. T. (2008). College majors and social mobility. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 26(2), 123-139.
80. Young, M. (1958). The rise of the meritocracy. London: Thames and Hudson.
81. Young, M. (2001, June 29). Down with meritocracy. The Guardian. Retrieved December 6, 2004, from http://www. guardian. co. uk/comment/story/051420700. html.
82. Zhang, L. (2005a). Advance to graduate education: The effect of college quality and undergraduate majors. The Review of Higher Education, 28(3), 313-338.
83. Zhang, L. (2005b). Do measures of college quality matter? The effect of college quality on graduates' earnings. The Review of Higher Education, 28(4), 571-596.