Sequential analysis reveals behavioral differences underlying female-biased predation risk in stalk-eyed flies

Ethology

Volumn 117, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 829-837

  Worthington, Amy M ^a   Swallow, John G ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; AVOIDANCE REACTION; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; FEMALE; FLY; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREDATION RISK; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPIDER; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

ARACHNIDA; DIOPSIDAE; PHIDIPPUS AUDAX; TELEOPSIS DALMANNI;

EID: 80051605954     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01941.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Andersson, M. 1994: Sexual Selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Bakeman, R. & Gottman, J. M. 1997: Observing Interaction. An Introduction to Sequential Analysis. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
3. Baker, R. H. & Wilkinson, G. S. 2001: Phylogenetic analysis of sexual dimorphism and eye-span allometry in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Evolution 55, 1373-1385.
4. Blumstein, D. T., Evans, C. & Daniels, J. C. 2006: JWatcher 1.0. Available at.
5. Burkhardt, D. & de la Motte, I. 1983: How stalk-eyed flies eye stalk-eyed flies: observation and measurements of the eyes of Cyrtodiopsis whitei (Diopsidae, Diptera). J. Comp. Physiol. 151, 407-421.
6. Chen, S., Yeelin Lee, A., Bowens, N. M., Huber, R. & Kravitz, E. A. 2002: Fighting fruit flies: a model system for the study of aggression. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 99, 5664-5668.
7. Clark, D. L. 1994: Sequence analysis of courtship behavior in the dimorphic jumping spider Maevia inclemens (Araneae, Salticidae). J. Arachnol. 22, 94-107.
8. Cotton, S., Fowler, K. & Pomiankowski, A. 2004: Condition dependence of sexual ornament size and variation in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae). Evolution 58, 1038-1046.
9. Cotton, S., Small, J., Hashim, R. & Pomiankowski, A. 2009: Eyespan reflects reproductive quality in wild stalk-eyed flies. Evol. Ecol. 24, 83-95.
10. Egge, A. R., Brandt, Y. & Swallow, J. G. 2011: Sequential analysis of aggressive interactions in the stalk-eyed fly Teleopsis dalmanni. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 369-379.
11. Endler, J. A. 1992: Signals, signal conditions, and he direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 139, S125-S153.
12. Fowler-Finn, K. D. & Hebets, E. A. 2010: More ornamented males exhibit increased predation risk and antipredatory escapes, but not greater mortality. Ethology 116, 1-13.
13. Freed, A. N. 2009: Foraging behavior in the jumping spider Phidippus audax: basis for selectivity. J. Zool. 203, 49-61.
14. Garland, T. Jr & Carter, P. A. 1994: Evolutionary physiology. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 56, 579-621.
15. Gibbs, A. G. 1999: Laboratory selection for the comparative physiologist. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 2709-2718.
16. Gottman, J. M. & Notarius, C. 1978: Sequential analysis of observational data using Markov chains. In: Single Subject Research: Strategies for Evaluating Change (Kratochwill, T. R., ed). Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 237-285.
17. Gottman, J. M. & Roy, A. K. 1990: Sequential Analysis: A Guide for Behavioral Scientists. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, NY.
18. Hedrick, A. V. 2000: Crickets with extravagant mating songs compensate for predation risk with extra caution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 671-675.
19. Hoikkala, A. & Crossley, S. 2000: Copulatory courtship in Drosophila: behavior and songs of D. birchii and D. serrata. J. Insect Behav. 13, 71-86.
20. Hurt, C. R., Stears-Ellis, S., Hughes, K. A. & Hedrick, P. W. 2004: Mating behavior in the endangered Sonoran topminnow: speciation in action. Anim. Behav. 67, 343-351.
21. Husak, J. F. & Swallow, J. G. 2011: Compensatory traits and the evolution of male ornaments. Behaviour 148, 1-29.
22. Husak, J. F., Macedonia, J. M., Fox, S. F. & Sauceda, R. C. 2006: Predation cost of conspicuous male coloration in collard lizards (Crotaphytus collaris): an experimental test using clay-covered model lizards. Ethology 112, 572-580.
23. Husak, J. F., Ribak, G., Wilkinson, G. S. & Swallow, J. G. 2011: Compensation for exaggerated eyestalks in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Funct. Ecol. 25, 608-616.
24. Jennions, M. D., Møller, A. P. & Petrie, M. 2001: Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis. Q. Rev. Biol. 76, 3-36.
25. Lauder, G. V. 1996: The argument from design. In: Adaptation (Rose, M. R. & Lauder, G. V., eds). Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp. 55-91.
26. Nelson, X. L. & Jackson, R. R. 2006: A predator from East Africa chooses malaria vectors as preferred prey. PLoS ONE 1: e132. doi:.
27. Nelson, X. J., Jackson, R. R. & Sune, G. 2005: Use of Anopheles-specific prey-capture behavior by the small juveniles of Evarcha culicivora, a mosquito-eating jumping spider. J. Arachnol. 33, 541-548.
28. Oufiero, C. E. & Garland, T. Jr 2007: Evaluation performance costs of sexually selected traits. Funct. Ecol. 21, 676-689.
29. Panhuis, T. M. & Wilkinson, G. S. 1999: Exaggerated male eye span influences contest outcome in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46, 221-227.
30. Reguera, P., Pomiankowski, A., Fowler, K. & Chapman, T. 2004: Low cost of reproduction in female stalk-eyed flies, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. J. Insect Physiol. 50, 103-108.
31. Ribak, G. & Swallow, J. G. 2007: Free flight maneuvers of stalk-eyed flies: do eye-stalks affect aerial turning behavior? J. Comp. Physiol. A. 193, 1065-1079.
32. Ribak, G., Pitts, M. L., Wilkinson, G. S. & Swallow, J. G. 2009: Wing shape, wing size and sexual-dimorphism in eye-span in stalk-eyed flies. (Diopsidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 98, 860-871.
33. Sackett, G. P. 1979: The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interactions research. In: Handbook of Infant Development (Osofsky, J. O., ed). John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, pp. 623-649.
34. Slater, P. J. B. 1973: Describing sequences of behavior. In: Perspectives of Ethology (Bateson, P. P. G. & Klopfer, P. H., eds). Plenum Press, New York, New York, pp. 131-135.
35. Slooten, E. 1994: Behavior of Hector's Dolphin: classifying behavior by sequence analysis. J. Mammol. 75, 956-964.
36. Stuart-Fox, D. M., Moussalli, A., Marshall, N. J. & Owens, I. P. F. 2003: Conspicuous males suffer higher predation risk: visual modelling and experimental evidence from lizards. Anim. Behav. 66, 541-550.
37. Swallow, J. G., Wilkinson, G. S. & Marden, J. H. 2000: Aerial performance of stalk-eyed flies that differ in eye span. J. Comp. Physiol. B. 170, 481-487.
38. Wainwright, P. C., Alfaro, M. E., Bolnick, D. I. & Husley, C. D. 2005: Many-to-one mapping of form and function: a general principle to organismal design? Integr. Comp. Biol. 45, 256-262.
39. Wilkinson, G. S. 1993: Artificial selection alters allometry in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae). Genet. Res. 62, 213-222.
40. Wilkinson, G. S. & Reillo, P. R. 1994: Female choice response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255, 1-6.
41. Wilkinson, G. S., Presgraves, D. C. & Crymes, L. 1998: Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppresion. Nature 391, 276-279.
42. Wilkinson, G. S., Johns, P. M., Kelleher, E. S., Muscedere, M. L. & Lorsong, A. 2006: Fitness effects of X chromosome drive in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. J. Evol. Biol. 19, 1851-1860.
43. Worthington, A. M. & Swallow, J. G. 2010: Behavioral compensation for sexually selected traits: gender differences in anti-predator behavior influence survival in stalk-eyed flies. Behav. Ecol. 21, 759-766.
44. Zhang, J. X. & Song, D. X. 2003: Six new and one newly recorded species of Salticidae (Arachnida: Araneae) from Singapore and Malaysia. Raffles Bull. Zool. 51, 187-195.
45. Zuk, M. & Kolluru, G. R. 1998: Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. Q. Rev. Biol. 73, 415-438.