Evaluation in tenure and promotion letters: Constructing Faculty as communicators, stars, and workers

Applied Linguistics

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 389-407

  Hyon, Sunny ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051604655     PISSN: 01426001     EISSN: 1477450X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/applin/amr003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. American Council on Education, American Association of University Professors, and United Educators Insurance Risk Retention Group. 2000. Good Practice in Tenure Evaluation: Advice for Tenured Faculty, Department Chairs, and Academic Administrators. American Council on Education.
2. Barton, E. 2002. 'Inductive discourse analysis: Discovering rich features' in E. Barton and G. Stygall (eds): Discourse Studies in Composition. Hampton, pp. 19-42.
3. Belcher, D. D. 2007. 'Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world,' Journal of Second Language Writing 16: 1-22.
4. Bukalski, P. J. 2000. Guide to Faculty Advancement: Annual Evaluation, Promotion, and Tenure. University Film and Video Association.
5. Chen, R. and S. Hyon. 2005. 'Faculty evaluation as a genre system: Negotiating intertextuality and interpersonality,' Journal of Applied Linguistics 2: 153-84.
6. Clark, B. R. 1987. The Academic Life: Small Worlds, Different Worlds. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
7. Creamer, E. G. 1998. Assessing Faculty Publication Productivity: Issues of Equity. The George Washington University.
8. Diamond, R. 1999. Aligning Faculty Rewards with Institutional Mission: Statements, Policies, and Guidelines. Anker.
9. Diamond, R. M. 2002. Serving on Promotion, Tenure, and Faculty Review Committees: A Faculty Guide, 2nd edn. Anker.
10. Diani, G. 2009. 'Reporting and evaluation in English book review articles: A cross-disciplinary study' in K. Hyland and G. Diani (eds): Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 87-104.
11. Dressen, D. 2003. Geologists' implicit persuasive strategies and the construction of evaluative evidence Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2: 273-90. (Pubitemid 41130706)
12. Fairweather, J. S. 2002. 'The ultimate faculty evaluation: Promotion and tenure decisions' in C. L. Colbeck (ed.): Evaluating Faculty Performance. Jossey-Bass, pp. 97-107.
13. Finkelstein, M. J., R. K. Seal, and J. H. Schuster. 1998. The New Academic Generation: A Profession in Transformation. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
14. Fortanet, I. 2008. 'Evaluative language in peer review referee reports,' Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7: 27-37.
15. Gosden, H. 2003. 'Why not give us the full story?: Functions of referees' comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers,' Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2: 87-101. (Pubitemid 41111944)
16. Groom, N. 2009. 'Phraseology and epistemology in academic book reviews: A corpus-driven analysis of two humanities disciplines' in K. Hyland and G. Diani (eds): Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 122-39.
17. Hewings, M. 2004. 'An 'important contribution' or 'tiresome reading'? A study of evaluation in peer reviews of journal article submissions,' Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: 247-74.
18. Huckin, T. 1992. 'Context-sensitive text analysis' in G. Kirsch and P. A. Sullivan (eds): Methods and Methodology in Composition Research. Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 84-104.
19. Hyland, K. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Longman.
20. Hyland, K. 2005. 'Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse,' Discourse Studies 7: 173-92.
21. Hyland K. and G. Diani (eds). 2009. Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings. Palgrave Macmillan.
22. Kourilova, M. 1998. 'Communicative characteristics of reviews of scientific papers written by non-native users of English,' Endocrine Regulations 32: 107-14. (Pubitemid 128528124)
23. Martin, J. R. and P. R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
24. Matsuda, P. K. and C. M. Tardy. 2007. 'Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review,' English for Specific Purposes 26: 235-49.
25. Rhode, D. L. 2006. In Pursuit of Knowledge: Scholars, Status, and Academic Culture. Stanford University Press.
26. Rockquemore, K. and T. Laszloffy. 2008. The Black Academic's Guide to Winning Tenure-Without Losing Your Soul. Lynne Rienner.
27. Schuster, J. H. and M. J. Finkelstein. 2006. The American Faculty: The Restructuring of Academic Work and Careers. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
28. Swales, J. M. 1996. 'Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter' in E. Ventola and A. Mauranen (eds): Academic Writing: Intercultural and Textual Issues. John Benjamins.
29. Swales, J. M. 2004. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
30. Thompson, G. and S. Hunston. 2000. 'Evaluation: An introduction' in S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds): Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford University Press, pp. 1-27.
31. Tierney, W. G. and E. M. Bensimon. 1996. Promotion and Tenure: Community and Socialization in Academe. State University of New York Press.
32. Valle, E. 2004. 'A nice and accurate philosopher: Interactivity and evaluation in a historical context' in G. D. Camiciotti and E. T. Bonelli (eds): Academic Discourse-New Insights into Evaluation. Peter Lang, pp. 55-80.
33. Willits, P., V. Tee, and D. Gephart. 2004. Tenure: A Legal Review. LRP.