Orthognathic surgical planning on three-dimensional stereolithographic biomodel

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1336-1341

  Erkan, Mustafa ^a   Ulkur, Ersin ^a   Karagoz, Huseyin ^b   Karacay, Seniz ^a   Basaran, Guvenc ^a   Sonmez, Guner ^a  

^a GATA HAYDARPASA TRAINING HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^b Maresal Cakmak Military Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

bone graft; midline deflection; Sagittal split ramus osteotomy; three dimensional stereolithographic biomodel

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CASE REPORT; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MAXILLA; MAXILLA OSTEOTOMY; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTICS; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PLASTIC SURGERY; PROGNATHIA; SAGITTAL SPLIT RAMAL OSTEOTOMY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; MAXILLA; MODELS, ANATOMIC; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; OSTEOTOMY, LE FORT; OSTEOTOMY, SAGITTAL SPLIT RAMUS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PROGNATHISM; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051547406     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821c930b     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Trauner R, Obwegeser H. The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty: surgical procedures to correct mandibular prognathism and reshaping of the chin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1957;10:677-689
2. Wolford LM. The sagittal split ramus osteotomy as the preferred treatment for mandibular prognathism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:310-312 (Pubitemid 30129871)
3. Wall G, Rosenquist B. Radiographic stereophotogrammetric evaluation of intersegmental stability after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy and rigid fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:1427-1435 (Pubitemid 33136353)
4. Erkmen E, Simzek B, Yücel E, et al. Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Part 1: advancement surgeryVposterior loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;34:551-558 (Pubitemid 40790354)
5. Mavili ME, Canter HI, Aydinatay BS, et al. Use of three-dimensional medical modeling methods for precise planning of orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2007;18:740-747 (Pubitemid 47220727)
6. Erkmen E, Simzek B, Yücel E, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis used to compare methods of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: setback surgeryVposterior loading. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;43:97-104 (Pubitemid 40326164)
7. Mavili ME, Canter HI, Saglam-Aydinatay B, et al. Tridimensional evaluation of maxillary and mandibular movements in orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2007;18:792-799 (Pubitemid 47220735)
8. Tharanon W. Comparison between the rigidity of bicortical screws and a miniplate for fixation of a mandibular setback after a simulated bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56: 1055-1058 (Pubitemid 28406592)
9. Swennen GR, Mollemans W, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional treatment planning of orthognathic surgery in the era of virtual imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:2080-2092
10. Kofod T, Pedersen TK, Norholt SE, et al. Stereolithographic models for simulation and transfer of vector in vertical distraction of the mandibular ramus: a technical note. J Craniofac Surg 2005;16:608-614 (Pubitemid 41271247)
11. Edwards RC, Kiely KD, Eppley BL, et al. Fixation of bimaxillary osteotomies with resorbable plates and screw: experience in 20 consecutive cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:271-276 (Pubitemid 32198310)
12. Ortakoglu K, Akcam T, Sencimen M, et al. Osteochondroma of the mandible causing severe facial asymmetry: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:e21Ye87
13. Cohen A, Laviv A, Berman P, et al. Mandibular reconstruction using stereolithographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:661-666
14. Al-Harbi SA, Sun AY. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results. Implant Dent 2009;18:46-56
15. ArNsan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomographyYbased clinical comparative study. J Periodontol 2010;81:43-51