Retained surgical items and minimally invasive surgery

World Journal of Surgery

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1532-1539

  Gibbs, Verna C ^a  

^a National Surgical Patient Safety Project NoThing Left behind   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; FOREIGN BODY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SURGICAL SPONGE;

FOREIGN BODIES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SURGICAL SPONGES;

EID: 80051544596     PISSN: 03642313     EISSN: 14322323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1060-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. National Quality Forum website (2010) http://www.qualityforum.org. Accessed 7 Nov 2010
2. National Patient Safety Agency website (2010) http://www.npsa.nhs.uk. Accessed 7 Nov 2010
3. R Flores-Suarez J Reyes-del Valle 2010 A foreign body N Engl J Med 363 1748 20979475 10.1056/NEJMicm0707656 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtlKitL%2FL
4. M Possover 2008 Gossypiboma in the pouch of Douglas N Engl J Med 359 e9 18716293 10.1056/NEJMicm075197
5. NoThing Left Behind website (2010) http://www.nothingleftbehind.org. Accessed 7 Nov 2010
6. Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses (2010) Recommended practices for prevention of retained surgical items. In: Perioperative standards and recommended practices. AORN, Denver, CO. http://www.aorn.org/psrp. Accessed 7 Nov 2010
7. VC Gibbs FD Coakley HD Reines 2007 Preventable errors in the operating room: retained foreign bodies after surgery - part 1 Curr Probl Surg 44 281 337 17512832 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2007.03.002 (Pubitemid 46760201)
8. Y Zantvoord RF van der Weiden MH van Hooff 2008 Transmural migration of retained surgical sponges: a systematic review Obstet Gynecol Surv 633 465 471 10.1097/OGX.0b013e318173538e
9. SP Stawicki DC Evans J Cipolla, et al. 2009 Retained surgical foreign bodies: a comprehensive review of risks and preventive strategies Scand J Surg 98 8 17 19447736 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MzlvValuw%3D%3D
10. CW Kaiser S Friedman KP Spurling, et al. 1996 The retained surgical sponge Ann Surg 224 79 84 8678622 10.1097/00000658-199607000-00012 1:STN:280:DyaK283ovFCrsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26227411)
11. AA Gawande DM Studdert EJ Orav, et al. 2003 Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery N Engl J Med 348 229 235 12529464 10.1056/NEJMsa021721 (Pubitemid 36077919)
12. AE Lincourt A Harrell J Cristiano, et al. 2007 Retained foreign bodies after surgery J Surg Res 138 170 174 17275034 10.1016/j.jss.2006.08.001 (Pubitemid 46365726)
13. W Wan T Le L Riskin A Macario 2009 Improving safety in the operating room: a systematic literature review of retained surgical sponges Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 22 207 214 19390247 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328324f82d
14. LK McIntyre GJ Jurkovich MD Gunn RV Maier 2010 Gossypiboma: tales of lost sponges and lessons learned Arch Surg 145 770 775 20713930 10.1001/archsurg. 2010.152
15. RR Cima A Kollengode AA Storsveen, et al. 2009 A multidisciplinary team approach to retained foreign objects Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 35 123 132 19326803
16. AB Haynes TG Weiser WR Berry SR Lipsitz, et al. 2009 A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population N Engl J Med 360 491 499 19144931 10.1056/NEJMsa0810119 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXht1Wku7w%3D
17. Hall MJ, DeFrances CJ, Williams SN et al (2010) National hospital discharge survey: 2007 summary. No. 29, 10/26/10. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhds/ nhds-products.htm. Accessed 7 Nov 2010
18. TR Huntington GR Klomp 1995 Retained staples as a cause of mechanical small-bowel obstruction Surg Endosc 9 353 354 7597615 10.1007/BF00187786 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzitVOktw%3D%3D
19. LE Mendez C Medina 1997 Late complication of laparoscopic salpingoophorectomy: retained foreign body presenting as an acute abdomen JSLS 1 79 81 9876653 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fptl2gsQ%3D%3D
20. P Soyer P Valleur 2008 Retained surgical needle after laparoscopic sacrocolporectopexy Clin Radiol 63 688 690 18455561 10.1016/j.crad.2007.11.007 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3psVSktg%3D%3D
21. RR Cima A Kollengode J Garnatz, et al. 2008 Incidence and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign object events in surgical patients J Am Coll Surg 207 80 87 18589366 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.047
22. F Kiernan M Joyce CK Byrnes, et al. 2008 Gossypiboma: a case report and review of the literature Ir J Med Sci 177 389 391 18820991 10.1007/s11845-008- 0197-0 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cjjsVKrtg%3D%3D
23. R Riley E Manias A Polglase 2006 Governing the surgical count through communication interactions: implications for patient safety Qual Saf Health Care 15 369 374 17074876 10.1136/qshc.2005.017293 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28njvFKrtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44784814)
24. CC Greenberg SE Regenbogen SR Lipsitz, et al. 2008 The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count Ann Surg 248 337 341 18650646 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318181c9a3
25. S Jackson S Brady 2008 Counting difficulties: retained instruments, sponges and needles AORN J 87 315 321 18323022 10.1016/j.aorn.2007.07.023
26. A Rowlands R Steeves 2010 Incorrect surgical counts: a qualitative analysis AORN J 92 410 419 20888943 10.1016/j.aorn.2010.01.019
27. VC Gibbs 2005 Patient safety practices in the operating room: correct site surgery and nothing left behind Surg Clin North Am 85 1307 1319 16326211 10.1016/j.suc.2005.09.007 (Pubitemid 41744046)
28. G Whang GT Mogel J Tsai SL Palmer 2009 Left behind:unintentionally retained surgically placed foreign bodies and how to reduce their incidence-pictorial review AJR Am J Roentgenol 193 S79 S89 19933680 10.2214/AJR.09.7153
29. AR O'Connor FV Coakley MV Meng S Eberhardt 2003 Imaging of retained surgical sponges in the abdomen and pelvis AJR Am J Roentgenol 180 481 489 12540456 (Pubitemid 36135036)
30. EM Edel 2010 Increasing patient safety and surgical team communication by using a count/time out board AORN J 92 420 424 20888944 10.1016/j.aorn.2010.03. 013
31. SJ Kleinpeter RC Kline MA Finan 1997 Retained surgical needle in the perineum. Report of a case with a novel method of search and rescue J Reprod Med 42 303 305 9172122 1:STN:280:DyaK2szhs1Wmsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27227744)
32. MT Ozgun C Batukan M Basbug T Atakul 2008 Management of a broken needle: retained in the first caesarean section, removed during the second abdominal delivery J Obstet Gynaecol 28 653 655 19003675 10.1080/01443610802378355 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cjjtl2itA%3D%3D
33. T Karahasanoglu E Unal K Memisoglu, et al. 2004 Laparoscopic removal of a retained surgical instrument J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 14 241 243 (Pubitemid 39128712)
34. D Rodrigues NE Perez PM Hammer JD Webber 2006 Laparoscopic removal of a retained intra-abdominal ribbon malleable retractor after 14 years J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 16 369 371 10.1089/lap.2006.16.369 (Pubitemid 44850055)
35. R Singh RK Mathur S Patidar R Tapkire 2004 Gossypiboma: its laparoscopic diagnosis and removal Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14 304 305 15492665 10.1097/00129689-200410000-00017 (Pubitemid 39426420)
36. IM Ibrahim 1995 Retained surgical sponge Surg Endosc 9 709 710 7482170 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FnsFygsw%3D%3D
37. PM Yuen MS Rogers AM Chang 1994 Laparoscopic removal of retained surgical gauze after vaginal hysterectomy Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 57 209 210 7713297 10.1016/0028-2243(94)90302-6 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3ivV2hsg%3D%3D
38. JM Childers P Caplinger 1993 Laparoscopic retrieval of a retained surgical sponge: a case report Surg Laparosc Endosc 3 135 138 8269234 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FpsVSgsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 23104703)
39. EH Chin D Hazzan DM Herron B Salky 2007 Laparoscopic retrieval of intraabdominal foreign bodies Surg Endosc 21 1457 17593464 10.1007/s00464-006- 9011-0
40. M Bhansali S Patankar S Dobhada 2006 Laparoscopic management of a retained heavily encrusted ureteral stent Int J Urol 13 1141 1143 16903950 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01473.x (Pubitemid 44125697)
41. R Bharathan S Dexter M Hanson 2009 Laparoscopic retrieval of retained Redivac drain fragment J Obstet Gynaecol 29 263 264 19358050 10.1080/01443610902754000 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M3mvVKgtA%3D%3D
42. R Dutta A Kumar CJ Das T Jindal 2010 Emergency video-assisted thoracoscopic foreign body removal and decortication of lung after chest trauma Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 58 155 158 20349308 10.1007/s11748-009-0490-5
43. Surgicount Medical website. http://www.surgicountmedical.com. Accessed 7 Nov 2010
44. RF Surgical website. http://www.RFsurg.com. Accessed 7 Nov 2010
45. Clearcount Medical website. http://www.clearcount.com. Accessed 7 Nov 2010
46. A Macario D Morris S Morris 2006 Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology Arch Surg 141 659 662 16847236 10.1001/archsurg.141.7.659 (Pubitemid 44079827)
47. CC Greenberg R Diaz-Flores SR Lipsitz, et al. 2008 Bar-coding surgical sponges to improve safety: a randomized controlled trial Ann Surg 247 612 616 18362623 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181656cd5 (Pubitemid 351440611)
48. Cima RR, Kollengode A, Clark J, Pool S et al. (2010) Evaluation and implementation of a bar-coded sponge counting system: impact on retained sponges after one year. Presented at American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress, Washington DC, October 3-7, 2010
49. Rupp CC, Kim HJ, Kagarise MJ (2010) Effectiveness of radio-frequency surgical detection system to promote patient patient safety during an operative procedure by improving the process by which doctors and nurses track sponges prior to wound closure. Presented at American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress, Washington DC, October 3-7, 2010
50. PR Lauwers RH Van Hee 2000 Intraperitoneal gossypibomas: the need to count sponges World J Surg 24 521 527 10787070 10.1007/s002689910084 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ks1Omsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30210839)