The rising relative risk of mortality for singles: Meta-analysis and meta-regression

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 174, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 379-389

  Roelfs, David J ^a,d   Shor, Eran ^b   Kalish, Rachel ^a   Yogev, Tamar ^c  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c NUFFIELD COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Meta analysis; mortality; single person

Indexed keywords

AGE CLASS; DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY; GENDER RELATIONS; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; META-ANALYSIS; MORTALITY RISK; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

AGE; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; HAZARD RATIO; HUMAN; MARRIED MAN; MARRIED WOMAN; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE; SINGLE MAN; SINGLE WOMAN; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MORTALITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK; SINGLE PERSON;

EID: 80051540932     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr111     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Durkheim E. Suicide. Glencoe, IL: Free Press; 1951.
2. Berkson J. Mortality and marital status. Reflections on the derivation of etiology from statistics. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1962;52(8):1318-1329.
3. Gove WR. Sex, marital status, and mortality. AJS. 1973; 79(1):45-67.
4. March L. Some researches concerning the factors of mortality. J R Stat Soc. 1912;75:505-538.
5. Ortmeyer CE. Variation in mortality, morbidity, and health care by marital status. In: Erhardt CL, Berlin JE, eds. Mortality and Morbidity in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1974:159-188.
6. Parkes CM, Benjamin B, Fitzgerald RG. Broken heart: a statistical study of increased mortality among widowers. Br Med J. 1969;1(5646):740-743.
7. Peritz E, Bialik O, Groen JJ. Mortality by marital status in the Jewish population of Israel. J Chronic Dis. 1967;20(10): 823-828.
8. Sheps MC. Marriage and mortality. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1961;51(4):547-555.
9. Shurtleff D. Mortality and marital status. Public Health Rep. 1955;70(3):248-252.
10. Espinosa J, Evans WN. Heightened mortality after the death of a spouse: marriage protection or marriage selection? J Health Econ. 2008;27(5):1326-1342.
11. Goldman N. Marriage selection and mortality patterns: inferences and fallacies. Demography. 1993;30(2):189-208.
12. Murray JE. Marital protection and marital selection: evidence from a historical-prospective sample of American men. Demography. 2000;37(4):511-521.
13. Stutzer A, Frey BS. Does marriage make people happy, or do happy people get married. J Socio Econ. 2006;35(2):326-347. (Pubitemid 43264534)
14. Waldron I, Hughes ME, Brooks TL. Marriage protection and marriage selection-prospective evidence for reciprocal effects of marital status and health. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43(1): 113-123.
15. Coombs R. Marital status and personal well-being: a literature review. Fam Relat. 1991;40(1):97-102.
16. Waite LJ, Gallagher M. The Case for Marriage: Why Married People are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially. New York, NY: Doubleday; 2000.
17. Amato PR, Booth A. Consequences of parental divorce and marital unhappiness for adult well-being. Soc Forces. 1991; 69(3):895-914.
18. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Malarkey WB, Chee M, et al. Negative behavior during marital conflict is associated with immunological down-regulation. Psychosom Med. 1993;55(5): 395-409.
19. Orth-Gomér K, Wamala SP, Horsten M, et al. Marital stress worsens prognosis in women with coronary heart disease: the Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study. JAMA. 2000; 284(23):3008-3014. (Pubitemid 32014737)
20. Brockmann H, Klein T. Love and death in Germany: the marital biography and its effect on mortality. J Marriage Fam. 2004;66(3):567-581. (Pubitemid 39146083)
21. Lund R, Holstein BE, Osler M. Marital history from age 15 to 40 years and subsequent 10-year mortality: a longitudinal study of Danish males born in 1953. Int J Epidemiol. 2004; 33(2):389-397. (Pubitemid 38578843)
22. Tucker JS, Friedman HS, Wingard DL, et al. Marital history at midlife as a predictor of longevity: alternative explanations to the protective effect of marriage. Health Psychol. 1996; 15(2):94-101. (Pubitemid 126468481)
23. Koskinen S. Mortality differences by marital status-a growing public health problem [in Finnish]. Sosiaalilaaketieteellinen Aikakauskirja. 1999;36:271-284.
24. Eggebeen DJ. Cohabitation and exchanges of support. Soc Forces. 2005;83(3):1097-1110. (Pubitemid 40777976)
25. Pinsof WM. The death of "till death us do part": the transformation of pair-bonding in the 20th century. Fam Process. 2002;41(2):135-157.
26. Brown SL. The effect of union type on psychological wellbeing: depression among cohabitors versus marrieds. J Health Soc Behav. 2000;41(3):241-255.
27. Wu Z, Penning MJ, Pollard MS, et al. In sickness and in health: does cohabitation count? J Fam Issues. 2003;24(6): 811-838. (Pubitemid 37056498)
28. Amato PR, Booth A, Johnson DR, et al. Alone Together: How Marriage in America Is Changing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2007.
29. Blossfeld H-P, Huinink J. Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women's schooling and career affect the process of family formation. Am J Sociol. 1991;97(1):143-168.
30. Goldstein JR, Kenney CT. Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. Am Sociol Rev. 2001;66:506-519. (Pubitemid 32793140)
31. Cherlin AJ. Marriage, Divorce, Remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1992.
32. Ferguson SJ. Challenging traditional marriage: never married Chinese American and Japanese American women. Gend Soc. 2000;14(1):136-159.
33. Offer A. The Challenge of Affluence: Self Control and Wellbeing in the United States and Britain Since 1950. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press; 2006.
34. Manzoli L, Villari PM, Pirone G, et al. Marital status and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(1):77-94. (Pubitemid 44750327)
35. Proulx CM, Helms HM, Buehler C. Marital quality and personal well-being: a meta-analysis. J Marriage Fam. 2007; 69:576-593.
36. Shor E, Roelfs DJ, Curreli M, et al.Widowhood and mortality: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Demography. In press.
37. Thompson Reuters. Journal Citation Reports. New York, NY: Thompson Reuters; 2009. (http://wokinfo.com/products-tools/analytical/jcr/). (Accessed December 13, 2010).
38. Huedo-Medina TB, Sánchez-Meca J, Marín-Martínez F. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? Psychol Methods. 2006;11(2):193-206. (Pubitemid 44001277)
39. Lipsey MW, Wilson DB. Practical Meta-Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2001.
40. Rosenthal R. The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(3):638-641.
41. Moreno SG, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, et al. Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a Comprehensive Simulation Study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:2. (doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-2).
42. Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, et al. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295(6):676-680. (Pubitemid 43209069)
43. Liu H, Umberson DJ. The times they are a changin': marital status and health differentials from 1972 to 2003. J Health Soc Behav. 2008;49(3):239-253.
44. Thornton A. Changing attitudes towards family issues in the US. J Marriage Fam. 1989;51:873-93.
45. Tucker MB. Marital values and expectations in context: results from a 21-city survey. In: Waite LJ, ed. The Ties That Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter; 2000:166-187.
46. Byrne A, Carr D. Caught in the cultural lag: the stigma of singlehood. Psychol Inq. 2005;16(2-3):84-91. (Pubitemid 41322633)
47. Stein PJ, ed. Single Life: Unmarried Adults in Social Context. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press; 1981.
48. Trimberger EK. The New Single Woman. Boston, MA: Beacon; 2005.
49. Mandel H, Semyonov M. Family policies, wage structures, and gender gaps: sources of earnings inequality in 20 countries. Am Sociol Rev. 2005;70(6):949-967.
50. McCall L. Gender and the new inequality: explaining the college/non-college wage gap. Am Sociol Rev. 2000;65(2): 234-255.
51. Bock JD. Doing the right thing: single mother by choice and the struggle for legitimacy. Gend Soc. 2000;14(1):62-86.
52. Western B, Bloome D, Percheski C. Inequality among American families with children, 1975 to 2005. Am Sociol Rev. 2008;73(6):903-920.
53. Christopher K, England P, Smeeding TM, et al. The gender gap in poverty in modern nations: single motherhood, the market, and the state. Sociol Perspect. 2002;45(3): 219-242.
54. McLanahan S, Booth K. Mother-only families: problems, prospect, and politics. J Marriage Fam. 1989;51:557-80.
55. Duncan GJ, Brooks-Gunn J. Family poverty, welfare reform, and child development. Child Dev. 2000;71(1):188-196.
56. Funiciello T. Poverty wears a female face. In: Morgan R, ed. Sisterhood Is Forever. New York, NY: Washington Square Press; 2003.
57. Lichter DT, Crowley ML. Poverty in America: beyond welfare reform. Popul Bull. 2002;57(2):3-36. (Pubitemid 38459542)
58. Norsigian J, The Boston Women's Health Book Collective. Women's health activism overview. In: Morgan R, ed. Sisterhood Is Forever. New York, NY: Washington Square Press; 2003.
59. Williams K, Sassler S, Nicholson LM. For better or for worse? The consequences of marriage and cohabitation for single mothers. Soc Forces. 2008;86(4):1481-1512.
60. Braun-Levine S. Parenting: a new social contract. In: Morgan R, ed. Sisterhood Is Forever. New York, NY: Washington Square Press; 2003:85-93.
61. DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith JC. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2008. In: US Census Bureau Current Population Report. Series P60-236. Washington, DC: US GPO; 2009.
62. Cornell LL. Why are there no spinsters in Japan? J Fam Hist. 1984;9(4):326-339.
63. Pelzel J. Japanese kinship: a comparison. In: Freedman M, ed. Family and Kinship in Chinese Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1970.
64. Fu H, Goldman N. Incorporating health into models of marriage choice: demographic and sociological perspectives. J Marriage Fam. 1996;58(3):740-758.
65. Wilson CM, Oswald AJ. How does marriage affect physical and psychological health? A survey of the longitudinal evidence. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1619. 2005. (http://ssrn. com/abstract/735205). (Accessed December 14, 2010).
66. Ellison CG, Hummer RA, Cormier S, et al. Religious involvement and mortality risk among African American adults. Res Aging. 2000;22(6):630-667.
67. Kim HK, McKenry PC. The relationship between marriage and psychological well-being. J Fam Issues. 2002;23(8): 885-911.
68. Kobrin FEA, Hendershot Gerry E. Do family ties reduce mortality? Evidence from the United States, 1966-1968. J Marriage Fam. 1997;39(4):737-745.
69. Lillard LA, Waite LJ. Til death do us part-marital disruption and mortality. Am J Soc. 1995;100(5):1131-1156.
70. Gardner J, Oswald A. How is mortality affected by money, marriage, and stress? J Health Econ. 2004;23(6): 1181-1207. (Pubitemid 39535590)
71. Grundy E, Kravdal Ø. Reproductive history and mortality in late middle age among Norwegian men and women. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(3):271-279. (Pubitemid 351197587)
72. Berman NG, Parker RA. Meta-analysis: neither quick nor easy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002;2:10. (doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-2-10).
73. Egger M, Smith GD. Bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ. 1998;316(7124):61-66.
74. Terrin N, Schmid CH, Lau J, et al. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity. Stat Med. 2003;22(13): 2113-2126. (Pubitemid 36818038)