Comparison of film and digital fundus photographs in eyes of individuals with diabetes mellitus

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 6168-6173

  Gangaputra, Sapna ^a   Almukhtar, Talat ^b   Glassman, Adam R ^b   Aiello, Lloyd Paul ^c   Bressler, Neil ^d   Bressler, Susan B ^d   Danis, Ronald P ^a   Davis, Matthew D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b JAEB CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIGITAL IMAGING; DISEASE SEVERITY; EYE PHOTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FILM; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEREOSCOPIC DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY; STEREOSCOPIC FILM PHOTOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MACULAR EDEMA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 80051532218     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7321     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Kodachrome film. http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/catalog/kodachrome64ProfessionalFilmPKR.jhtml. Accessed October, 19, 2010.
2. Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Neider MW, et al. Brightness, contrast, and color balance of digital versus film retinal images in the age-related eye disease study 2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(8):3269-3282.
3. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs: an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:786-806.
4. Vujosevic S, Benetti E, Massignan F, et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: 1 and 3 nonmydriatic 45-degree digital fundus photographs vs 7 standard early treatment diabetic retinopathy study fields. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(1):111-118.
5. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net). Information about the Network. Information for investigators. Procedures. Available at http://www.drcr.net. Accessed on October 19, 2010.
6. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 12. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:823-833.
7. Gangnon R, Hubbard LD, Aiello LM, et al. A severity scale for diabetic macular edema (DME) developed from ETDRS data. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:5041-5047.
8. Davis MD, Bressler SB, Aiello LP, et al. Comparison of time-domain OCT and fundus photographic assessments of retinal thickening in eyes with diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(5):1745-1752.
9. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985; 103(12):1796-1806.
10. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-174.
11. Kuritz SJ, Landis JR, Koch GG. A general overview of Mantel- Haenszel methods: applications and recent developments. Annu Rev Public Health. 1988;9:123-160.
12. Lin DY, Blumenkranz MS, Brothers RJ, Grosvenor DM. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134(2):204-213.
13. Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, et al. Digital versus film fundus photography for research grading of diabetic retinopathy severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(11):5846-5852.
14. Bursell SE, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA, et al. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(3):572-585.
15. Li HK, Danis RP, Hubbard LD, Florez-Arango JF, Esquivel A, Krupinski EA. Comparability of digital photography with the ETDRS film protocol for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(7):4717-4725.
16. Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Florez-Arango JF, Esquivel A, Krupinski EA. Comparison of multiple stereoscopic and monoscopic digital image formats to film for diabetic macular edema evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(12):6753-6761.