Comparison of removal torques for laser-treated titanium implants with anodized implants

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1491-1495

  Kang, Sang Hwan ^a   Cho, Sung Am ^a  

^a Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Anodized; dental implant; laser treated; pore; removal torque; titanium

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ETCHING; ELECTROCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; FEMUR; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POROSITY; RABBIT; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SOLID STATE LASER; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TORQUE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNIQUES; FEMUR; LASERS, SOLID-STATE; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; POROSITY; RABBITS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; TORQUE;

EID: 80051531330     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821d4d98     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Albrektsson T, Bra?nemark PI, Hansson HA, et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-170. (Pubitemid 11157048)
2. Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. Analysis of 164 titanium oxide-surface implants in completely edentulous arches for fixed prosthesis anchorage using the pterygomaxillary region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:946-952. (Pubitemid 43104474)
3. Rocci A, Martignoni M, Gottlow J. Immediate loading of Bra?nemark System TiUnite and machined-surface implants in the posterior mandible: a randomized open-ended clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Res 2003;5(suppl 1):57-63 (Pubitemid 43020660)
4. Hall J, Lausmaa J. Properties of a new porous oxide surface on titanium implants. Appl Osseointegration Res 2000;1:5-8
5. Calandriello R, Tomatis M. Immediate occlusal loading of single lower molars using Bra?nemark System(R) wide platform TiUnite implants: a 5-year follow-up report of a prospective clinical multicenter. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res August 5, 2009 [Epub ahead of print]
6. Friberg B, Jemt T. Clinical experience of TiUnite implants: a 5-year cross-sectional, retrospective follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12(Suppl 1):e95Ye103
7. Bahat O. Technique for placement of oxidized titanium implants in compromised maxillary bone: prospective study of 290 implants in 126 consecutive patients followed for a minimum of 3 years after loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:325-334
8. Albrektsson T, Gottlow J, Meirelles M, et al. Survival of Nobel Direct implants: an analysis of 550 consecutively placed implants at 18 different clinical centers. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007;9:65-70
9. Nowzari H, CheeW, Yi K, et al. Scalloped dental implants: a retrospective analysis of radiographic and clinical outcomes of 17 Nobel perfect implants in 6 patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8:1-10 (Pubitemid 43844739)
10. O?stman PO, Hellman M, Albrektsson T, et al. Direct loading of Nobel Direct and Nobel Perfect one-piece implants: a 1-year prospective clinical and radiographic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:409-418
11. Sennerby L, Becker W, Jonsson L, et al. Short term clinical results of Nobel Direct implant. A retrospective multicentre analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:219-226
12. Van de Velde T, Thevissen E, Persson GR, et al. Two-year outcome with Nobel Direct implants: a retrospective radiographic and microbiologic study in 10 patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:183-193
13. Rasmusson L, Roos J, Bystedt HA. 10-year follow-up study of titanium dioxideYblasted implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:36-42 (Pubitemid 40445861)
14. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces. Part 1: Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:536-543 (Pubitemid 39360697)
15. Ellingsen JE, Thomsen P, Lyngstadaas SP. Advances in dental implant materials and tissue regeneration. Periodontol 2000 2006;41:136-156 (Pubitemid 43941205)
16. Palmquist A, Omar OM, Esposito M, et al. Titanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome. J R Soc Interface 2010;7:S515YS527
17. Palmquist A, Lindberg F, Emanuelsson L, et al. Biomechanical, histological, and ultrastructural analyses of laser micro-and nano-structured titanium alloy implants: a study in rabbit. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;15:1476-1486
18. Cho SA, Jung SK. A removal torque of the laser-treated titanium implants in rabbit tibia. Biomaterials 2003;24:4859
19. Faeda RS, Tavares HS, Sartori R, et al. Evaluation of titanium implants with surface modification by laser beam. Biomechanical study in rabbit tibias. Braz Oral Res 2009;23:137-143
20. Yang B, Uchida M, Kim HM, et al. Preparation of bioactive titanium metal via anodic oxidation treatment. Biomaterials 2004;25:1003-1010 (Pubitemid 37393291)
21. Sul YT, Byon E, Wennerberg A. Surface characteristics of electrochemically oxidized implants and acid-etched implants: surface chemistry, morphology, pore configurations, oxide thickness, crystal structure, and roughness. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:631-640
22. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, et al. Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:252-259 (Pubitemid 41698462)
23. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Ro?ser K, et al. Qualitative and quantitative observations of bone tissue reactions to anodised implants. Biomaterials 2002;23:1809-1817
24. Hulbert SF, Young FA, Mathews RS, et al. Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 1970;4:433-456
25. Sauer BW, Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ, et al. The role of porous polymeric materials inprosthesis attachment. J Biomed Mater Res 1974;8:145-153
26. Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, et al. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;150:263-270 (Pubitemid 10039063)
27. Li J, Liao H, Fartash B, et al. Surfacedimpled commercially pure titanium implant and bone ingrowth. Biomaterials 1997;18:691-696 (Pubitemid 27267832)
28. Klawitter JJ, Weinstein AM. The status of porous materials to obtain direct skeletal attachment by tissue ingrowth. Acta Orthop Belg 1974;40:755-765
29. Itala AI, Ylanen HO, Ekholm C, et al. Pore diameter of more than 100 micron is not requisite for bone ingrowth in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;58:679-683 (Pubitemid 33096568)
30. Stangl R, Pries A, Loos B, et al. Influence of pores created by laser superfinishing on osseointegration of titanium alloy implants. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;69:444-453 (Pubitemid 38668170)
31. Vilhena LM, Sedlacek M, Podgornik B, et al Surface texturing by pulsed Nd:YAG laser. Tribology Int 2009;42:1496-1504
32. Xue W, Krishna BV, Bandyopadhyay A, et al. Processing and biocompatibility evaluation of laser processed porous titanium. Acta Biomater 2007;3:1007-1018 (Pubitemid 47382673)
33. Laoui T, Santos E, Osakada K, et al. Properties of titanium dental implant models made by laser processing. J Mech Eng Sci 2006;220:857-863 (Pubitemid 44323338)
34. Deppe H,Warmuth S, Heinrich A, et al. Laser-assisted three-dimensional surface modifications of titanium implants: preliminary data. Lasers Med Sci 2005;19:229-233 (Pubitemid 40603178)
35. Sul YT, Byon ES, Jeong Y. Biomechanical measurements of calcium-incorporated oxidized implants in rabbit bone: effect of calcium surface chemistry of a novel implant. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:101-110 (Pubitemid 39481794)
36. Sul YT. The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant. Biomaterials 2003;24:3893-3907
37. Faeda RS, Tavares HS, Sartori R, et al. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:1706-1715