Prism adaptation and generalization during visually guided locomotor tasks

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 860-871

  Scott Alexander, M ^a   Flodin, Brent W G ^a   Marigold, Daniel S ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Locomotion; Obstacle avoidance; Precision stepping; Vision

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEG MOVEMENT; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRISM; PROPRIOCEPTION; SENSORY STIMULATION; STIMULUS GENERALIZATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ADAPTATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; AVOIDANCE LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051520458     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01040.2010     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Andujar JE, Lajoie K, Drew T. A contribution of area 5 of the posterior parietal cortex to the planning of visually guided locomotion: limb-specific and limb-independent effects. J Neurophysiol 103: 986-1006, 2010.
2. Baraduc P, Wolpert DM. Adaptation to a visuomotor shift depends on the starting posture. J Neurophysiol 88: 973-981, 2002.
3. Bastian AJ. Understanding sensorimotor adaptation and learning for rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 21: 628-633, 2008.
4. Beloozerova IN, Sirota MG. Integration of motor and visual information in the parietal area 5 during locomotion. J Neurophysiol 90: 961-971, 2003.
5. Blanchette A, Bouyer LJ. Timing-specific transfer of adapted muscle activity after walking in an elastic force field. J Neurophysiol 102: 568-577, 2009.
6. Bosco G, Poppele RE, Eian J. Reference frames for spinal propriception: limb endpoint based or joint-level based? J Neurophysiol 83: 2931-2945, 2000.
7. Chapman HL, Eramudugolla R, Gavrilescu M, Strudwick MW, Loftus A, Cunnington R, Mattingley JB. Neural mechanisms underlying spatial realignment during adaptation to optical wedge prisms. Neuropsychologia 48: 2595-2601, 2010.
8. Choi JT, Bastian AJ. Adaptation reveals independent control networks for human walking. Nat Neurosci 10: 1055-1062, 2007.
9. Clower DM, Dum RP, Strick PL. Basal ganglia and cerebellar inputs to 'AIP'. Cereb Cortex 15: 913-920, 2005.
10. Clower DM, Hoffman JM, Votaw JR, Faber TL, Woods RP, Alexander GE. Role of posterior parietal cortex in the recalibration of visually guided reaching. Nature 383: 618-621, 1996.
11. Danckert J, Ferber S, Goodale MA. Direct effects of prismatic lenses on visuomotor control: an event-related functional MRI study. Eur J Neurosci 28: 1696-1704, 2008.
12. Drew T, Marigold DS. The effect of manipulation of visual input on the discharge activity of cells in the posterior parietal cortex during voluntary gait modifications in the cat (Abstract). Abstr Soc Neurosci 860.6, 2008.
13. Fortin K, Blanchette A, McFadyen BJ, Bouyer LJ. Effects of walking in a force field for varying durations an aftereffects and on next day performance. Exp Brain Res 199: 145-155, 2009.
14. Harris CS. Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision. Psychol Rev 72: 419-444, 1965.
15. Ivanenko YP, Grasso R, Macellari V, Lacquaniti F. Control of foot trajectory in human locomotion: role of ground contact forces in simulated reduced gravity. J Neurophysiol 87: 3070-3089, 2002.
16. Kennedy PM, Carlsen AN, Inglis JT, Chow R, Franks IM, Chua R. Relative contributions of visual and vestibular information on the trajectory of human gait. Exp Brain Res 153: 113-117, 2003.
17. Krakauer JW. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 19: 84-90, 2006.
18. Lajoie K, Drew T. Lesions of area 5 of the posterior parietal cortex in the cat produce errors in the accuracy of paw placement during visually guided locomotion. J Neurophysiol 97: 2339-2354, 2007.
19. Lam T, Anderschitz M, Dietz V. Contribution of feedback and feedforward strategies to locomotor adaptations. J Neurophysiol 95: 766-773, 2006.
20. Lam T, Dietz V. Transfer of motor performance in an obstacle avoidance task to different walking conditions. J Neurophysiol 92: 2010-2016, 2004.
21. Luauté J, Schwartz S, Rossetti Y, Spiridon M, Rode G, Boisson D, Vuilleumier P. Dynamic changes in brain activity during prism adaptation. J Neurosci 29: 169-178, 2009.
22. Marigold DS. Role of peripheral visual cues in online visual guidance of locomotion. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 36: 145-151, 2008.
23. Marigold DS, Andujar JE, Lajoie K, Drew T. Motor planning of locomotor adaptations on the basis of vision: the role of the posterior parietal cortex. Prog Brain Res 188: 83-100, 2011.
24. Marigold DS, Patla AE. Strategies for dynamic stability during locomotion on a slippery surface: effects of prior experience and knowledge. J Neurophysiol 88: 339-353, 2002.
25. Marple-Horvat DE, Criado JM. Rhythmic neuronal activity in the lateral cerebellum of the cat during visually guided stepping. J Physiol 518: 595-603, 1999.
26. Marple-Horvat DE, Criado JM, Armstrong DM. Neuronal activity in the lateral cerebellum of the cat related to visual stimuli at rest, visually guided step modification, and saccadic eye movements. J Physiol 506: 489-514, 1998.
27. Martin TA, Keating JG, Goodkin HP, Bastian AJ, Thach WT. Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation. Brain 119: 1183-1198, 1996.
28. Martin TA, Keating JG, Goodkin HP, Bastian AJ, Thach WT. Throwing while looking through prisms. II. Specificity and storage of multiple gazethrow calibrations. Brain 119: 1199-1211, 1996.
29. Miall RC, Christensen LO, Cain O, Stanley J. Disruption of state estimation in the human lateral cerebellum. PLoS Biol 5: e316, 2007.
30. Michel C, Vernet P, Courtine G, Ballay Y, Pozzo T. Asymmetrical aftereffects of prism adaptation during goal oriented locomotion. Exp Brain Res 185: 259-268, 2008.
31. Morton SM, Bastian AJ. Prism adaptation during walking generalizes to reaching and requires the cerebellum. J Neurophysiol 92: 2497-2509, 2004.
32. Patla AE, Greig MA. Any way you look at it, successful obstacle negotiation needs visually guided on-line foot placement during the approach phase. Neurosci Lett 397: 110-114, 2006.
33. Pearson TS, Krakauer JW, Mazzoni P. Learning not to generalize: modular adaptation of visuomotor gain. J Neurophysiol 103: 2938-2952, 2010.
34. Pisella L, Gréa H, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Desmurget M, Rode G, Boisson D, Rossetti Y. An 'automatic pilot' for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nat Neurosci 3: 729-736, 2000.
35. Pisella L, Michel C, Gréa H, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Rossetti Y. Preserved prism adaptation in bilateral optic ataxia: strategic versus adaptive reaction to prisms. Exp Brain Res 156: 399-408, 2004.
36. Redding GM, Rossetti Y, Wallace B. Applications of prism adaptation: a tutorial in theory and method. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29: 431-444, 2005.
37. Redding GM, Wallace B. Components of prism adaptation in terminal and concurrent exposures: organization of the eye-hand coordination loop. Percept Psychophys 44: 59-68, 1988.
38. Redding GM, Wallace B. Effects of movement duration and visual feedback on visual and proprioceptive components of prism adaptation. J Mot Behav 26: 257-266, 1994.
39. Redding GM, Wallace B. Strategic calibration and spatial alignment: a model from prism adaptation. J Mot Behav 34: 126-138, 2002.
40. Rossignol S, Dubuc R, Gossard JP. Dynamic sensorimotor interactions in locomotion. Physiol Rev 86: 89-154, 2006.
41. Savin DN, Morton SM. Asymmetric generalization between the arm and leg following prism-induced visuomotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res 186: 175- 182, 2008.
42. Savin DN, Tseng SC, Morton SM. Bilateral adaptation during locomotion following a unilaterally applied resistance to swing in nondisabled adults. J Neurophysiol 104: 3600-3611, 2010.
43. Shadmehr R, Krakauer JW. A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Exp Brain Res 185: 359-381, 2008.
44. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208-3224, 1994.
45. Shadmehr R, Smith MA, Krakauer JW. Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci 33: 89-108, 2010.
46. Tseng YW, Diedrichsen J, Krakauer JW, Shadmehr R, Bastian AJ. Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptations of reaching. J Neurophysiol 98: 54-62, 2007.
47. van Hedel HJ, Biedermann M, Erni T, Dietz V. Obstacle avoidance during human walking: transfer of motor skill from one leg to the other. J Physiol 543: 709-717, 2002.