Narrative language in traumatic brain injury

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 49, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 2904-2910

  Marini, Andrea ^a,b   Galetto, Valentina ^c,d   Zampieri, Elisa ^b   Vorano, Lorenza ^e   Zettin, Marina ^c,d   Carlomagno, Sergio ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

^b SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^c Centro Puzzle   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^e IMFR Gervasutta   (Italy)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Narrative analysis; Neurolinguistics; Neuropsychology; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; INJURY SEVERITY; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; NARRATIVE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHONEME; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; SHORT TERM MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NARRATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SPEECH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051472451     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.017     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Angeleri R., Bosco F.M., Zettin M., Sacco K., Colle L., Bara B.G. Communicative impairment in traumatic brain injury: A complete pragmatic assessment. Brain and Language 2008, 107:229-245.
2. Brookshire B.L., Chapman S.B., Song J., Levin H.S. Cognitive and linguistic correlates of children's discourse after closed head injury: A three year follow-up. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2000, 7:741-750.
3. Caplan D. Language. Structure, processing and disorders 1992, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Cannizzaro M.S., Coelho C.A. Treatment of story grammar following traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. Brain Injury 2002, 16:1065-1073.
5. Carlomagno S., Giannotti S., Vorano L., Marini A. Discourse informativeness in TBI adults without aphasic symptoms. The 46th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Aphasia 2008.
6. Chapman S.B., Culhane K.A., Levin H.S., Harward H., Mendelsohn D., Wwing-Cobbs L., et al. Narrative discourse after closed head injury in children and adolescents. Brain and Language 1992, 43:42-65.
7. Coelho C.A. Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: Influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2002, 45:1232-1248.
8. Coelho C.A, Grela B., Corso M., Gamble A., Feinn R. Microlinguistic deficits in the narrative discourse of adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2005, 19(13):1139-1145.
9. Davis G.A., Coehlo C.A. Referential cohesion and logical coherence of narration after closed head injury. Brain and Language 2004, 89:508-523.
10. Docking K., Murdoch B.E., Jordan F.M. Interpretation and comprehension of linguistic humor by adolescents with head injury: A group analysis. Brain Injury 2000, 14:89-108.
11. Ehrlich J.S. Selective characteristics of narrative discourse in head injured and normal adults. Journal of Communication Disorders 1988, 21:1-9.
12. Ellis C., Peach R.K. Sentence planning following traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2009, 24(3):255-266.
13. Glosser G. Discourse production patterns in neurologically impaired and aged populations. Narrative discourse in neurologically impaired and normal aging adults 1993, Singular Publishing Group, Inc, San Diego, CA. H.H. Brownell, Y. Joanette (Eds.).
14. Glosser G., Deser T. Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders. Brain and Language 1990, 40:67-88.
15. Haravon A., Obler L., Sarno M. A method for microanalysis of discourse in brain-damaged patients. Discourse analysis and applications: Studies in adult clinical populations 1994, 47-80. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale. R. Bloom, L. Obler, S. De Santi, J. Ehrlich (Eds.).
16. Hartley L.L., Jensen P.J. Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Injury 1991, 5:267-285.
17. Hartley L.L., Jensen P.J. Three discourse profiles of closedhead-injury speakers: Theoretical and clinical implications. Brain Injury 1992, 6:271-282.
18. Heaton R.K., Chelune G.J., Talley J.L., Kay G.G., Curtiss G. Wisconsin card sorting test manual, revised and expanded 1993, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa.
19. Huber W., Gleber J. Linguistic and non-linguistic processing of narratives in aphasia. Brain and Language 1982, 16:1-18.
20. Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery 1982, Grune and Stratton, New York.
21. Levelt W.J.M., Roelofs A., Meyer A.S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22:1-37.
22. Luzzatti C., Willems K., DeBleser R. Aachener Aphasie Test (Versione Italiana) 1991, Organiszazioni Speciali, Firenze.
23. Marini A., Boewe A., Caltagirone C., Carlomagno S. Age-related differences in the production of textual descriptions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2005, 34:439-463.
24. Marini A., Carlomagno S., Caltagirone C., Nocentini U. The role played by the right hemisphere in the organization of complex textual structures. Brain and Language 2005, 93:46-54.
25. Marini A., Spoletini I., Rubino I.A., Ciuffa M., Banfi G., Siracusano A., et al. The Language of Schizophrenia: An analysis of micro- and macrolinguistic abilities and their neuropsychological correlates. Schizophrenia Research 2008, 105:144-155.
26. Marini, A., Andreetta, S., del Tin, S., & Carlomagno, S. (2011) A multi-level approach to the analysis of narrative language in Aphasia. Aphasiology, DOI:10.1080/02687038.2011.584690.
27. McDonald S., Pearce S. Clinical insight into pragmatic theory: Frontal lobe deficits and sarcasm. Brain and Language 1996, 61:88-104.
28. Mentis M., Prutting C.A. Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head-injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1987, 30:88-98.
29. Nicholas L., Brookshire R. A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech Hearing Research 1993, 36:338-350.
30. Peach R.K., Schaude B.A. Reformulating the notion of "preserved syntax following closed head injury" Paper Presented to the Annual Convention of the American Speech- Language-Hearing Association 1986.
31. Raven J.C. Progressive matrices: A perceptual test of intelligence 1938, H.K. Lewis, London.
32. Reitan R.M. Trail making test 1992, Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory, Arizona.
33. Saffran E.M., Berndt R.S., Schwartz M.F. The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data. Brain and Language 1989, 37:440-479.
34. Shewan C.M. The Shewan Spontaneous Language Analysis (SSLA) system for aphasic adults: Description, reliability and validity. Journal of Communication Disorders 1988, 21:103-138.
35. Snow P., Douglas J., Ponsford J. Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: A follow-up study. Brain Injury 1998, 12:911-935.
36. Snow P., Douglas J. Conceptual and methodological challenges in discourse assessment with TBI speakers: Towards an understanding. Brain Injury 2000, 14(5):397-415.
37. Stierwalt J.A.G., Murray L.L. Attention impairment following traumatic brain injury. Seminars in Speech and Language 2002, 23(2):129-138.
38. Stout C.L., Yorkston K.M., Pimental J.D. Discourse production following mild, moderate and severe TBI: Comparison of two tasks. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology 2000, 8:15-25.
39. Thompson C.K, Shapiro L.P., Tait M., Jacobs B., Schneider S.L. Training wh-question production in agrammatic aphasia: Analysis of argument and adjunct movement. Brain and Language 1996, 52:175-228.
40. Yorkston K.M., Beukelman D.R. An analysis of connected speech samples of aphasic and normal speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1980, 45:27-36.