Continuous theta-burst stimulation to primary motor cortex reduces the overproduction of forces following removal of visual feedback

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 49, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 2941-2946

  Therrien, Amanda S ^a   Richardson, Brian A ^a   Balasubramaniam, Ramesh ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Efference copy; Force production; Motor cortex; Sensory attenuation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENUATION; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; NERVE CELL EXCITABILITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PINCH STRENGTH; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; SENSORY ANALYSIS; THETA RHYTHM; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT;

ADULT; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051469785     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.023     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bays P.M., Flanagan J.R., Wolpert D.M. Attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations is predictive, not postdictive. PLoS Biology 2006, 4(2):e28.
2. Bays P.M., Wolpert D.M., Flanagan J.R. Perception of the consequences of self-action is temporally tuned and event driven. Current Biology 2005, 15(12):1125-1130.
3. Bestmann S., Baudewig J., Siebner H.R., Rothwell J.C., Frahm J. Functional MRI of the immediate impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical and subcortical motor circuits. European Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 19(7):1950-1960.
4. Blakemore S.J., Goodbody S.J., Wolpert D.M. Predicting the consequences of our own actions: The role of sensorimotor context estimation. The Journal of Neuroscience 1998, 18(18):7511-7520.
5. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D.M., Frith C.D. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience 1998, 1(7):635-640.
6. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D., Frith C. Why can't you tickle yourself?. Neuroreport 2000, 11(11):R11-R20.
7. Chen R., Yung D., Li J.-Y. Organization of ipsilateral excitatory and inhibitory pathways in the human motor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 89(3):1256-1260.
8. Chronicle E., Glover J. A Ticklish Question: Does Magnetic Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex Give Rise to an "Efference copy" ?. Cortex 2003, 39(1):105-110.
9. Cincotta M., Giovannelli F., Borgheresi a., Balestrieri F., Zaccara G., et al. Modulatory effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the ipsilateral silent period. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 171(4):490-500.
10. Di Lazzaro V., Pilato F., Dileone M., Profice P., Oliviero a., Mazzone P., et al. The physiological basis of the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. The Journal of Physiology 2008, 586(16):3871-3880.
11. Evarts E.V. Relation of pyramidal tract activity to force exerted during voluntary movement. Journal of Neurophysiology 1968, 31(1):14-27.
12. Huang Y.-Z., Edwards M.J., Rounis E., Bhatia K.P., Rothwell J.C. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 2005, 45(2):201-210.
13. Huang Y.-Z., Rothwell J.C. The effect of short-duration bursts of high-frequency, low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation on the human motor cortex. Clinical Neurophysiology 2004, 115(5):1069-1070.
14. Okabe S., Hanajima R., Ohnishi T., Nishikawa M., Imabayashi E., Takano H., et al. Functional connectivity revealed by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex. Clinical Neurophysiology 2003, 114(3):450-460.
15. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9(1):97-113.
16. Shergill S.S., Bays P.M., Frith C.D., Wolpert D.M. Two eyes for an eye: The neuroscience of force escalation. Science 2003, 301(5630):187.
17. Shergill S.S., Samson G., Bays P.M., Frith C.D., Wolpert D.M. Evidence for sensory prediction deficits in schizophrenia. The American Journal of Psychiatry 2005, 162(12):2384-2390.
18. Siebner H.R., Peller M., Willoch F., Minoshima S., Boecker H., Auer C., et al. Lasting cortical activation after repetitive TMS of the motor cortex: A glucose metabolic study. Neurology 2000, 54(4):956-960.
19. Streit M., Shockley K., Morris A.W., Riley M.A. Rotational kinematics influence multimodal perception of heaviness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2007, 14(2):363-370.
20. Streit M., Shockley K., Riley M.A. Rotational inertia and multimodal heaviness perception. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2007, 14(5):1001-1010.
21. Therrien A.S., Balasubramaniam R. Timing and visual feedback constraints on repetitive finger force production. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 201(4):673-680.
22. Therrien A.S., Lyons J., Balasubramaniam R. Repetitive finger force production in predictable environments. Neuroscience Letters 2010, 479(1):69-73.
23. Trompetto C., Bove M., Marinelli L., Avanzino L., Buccolieri A., Abbruzzese G. Suppression of the transcallosal motor output: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study in healthy subjects. Experimental Brain Research 2004, 158(2):133-140.
24. Voss M., Bays P.M., Rothwell J.C., Wolpert D.M. An improvement in perception of self-generated tactile stimuli following theta-burst stimulation of primary motor cortex. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45(12):2712-2720.
25. Wasserman E.M. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial repetitive stimulation: Report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation June 5-7, 1996. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1998, 108(1):1-16.
26. Withagen R., Michaels C.F. Transfer of calibration in length perception by dynamic touch. Perception and Psychophysics 2004, 66(8):1282-1290.
27. Withagen R., Michaels C.F. The role of feedback information for calibration and attunement in perceiving length by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31(6):1379-1380.
28. Wolpert D.M. Probabilistic models in human sensorimotor control. Human Movement Science 2007, 26(4):511-520.
29. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3:1212-1220.