Repetitive finger force production in predictable environments

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 479, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 69-73

  Therrien, Amanda S ^a   Lyons, James ^a   Balasubramaniam, Ramesh ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Escalation effect; Force production; Reafference; Timing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY YIELD; FEMALE; FORCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PINCH STRENGTH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF EVALUATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TACTILE STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FINGER; HAND STRENGTH; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TIME; VISION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; FINGERS; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77953694881     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.033     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bays P.M., Flanagan J.R., Wolpert D.M. Attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations is predictive, not postdictive. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e28.
2. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D.M., Frith C.D. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nat. Neurosci. 1998, 1:635-640.
3. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D.M., Frith C.D. Why can't you tickle yourself?. Neuroreport 2000, 11:R11-R16.
4. Cramer S., Weisskoff R., Schaechter J., Nelles G., Foley M., Finklestein S., Rosen B. Motor cortex activation is related to force of squeezing. Hum. Brain Map. 2002, 16:197-205.
5. Cullen K.E. Sensory signals during active versus passive movement. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2004, 14:698-706.
6. Dai T., Liu J., Sahgal V., Brown R., Yue G. Relationship between muscle output and functional MRI-measured brain activation. Exp. Brain Res. 2001, 140:290-300.
7. Delignieres D., Ramdani S., Lemoine L., Torre K., Fortes M., Ninot G. Fractal analyses for 'short' time series: a re-assessment of classical methods. J. Mat. Psychol. 2006, 50:525-544.
8. Engelbrecht S., Berthier N., O'Sullivan L. The undershoot bias: learning to act optimally under uncertainty. Psychol. Sci. 2003, 14:257-261.
9. Körding K.P., Ku S., Wolpert D.M. Bayesian integration in force estimation. J. Neurophys. 2004, 92:3161-3165.
10. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
11. Pope P.A., Praamstra P., Wing A.M. Force and time control in the production of rhythmic movement sequences in Parkinson's disease. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2006, 23:1643-1650.
12. Pope P.A., Wing A.M., Praamstra P., Miall R.C. Force related activations in rhythmic sequence production. Neuroimage 2005, 27:909-918.
13. Shergill S.S., Bays P.M., Frith C.D., Wolpert D.M. Two eyes for an eye: the neuroscience of force escalation. Science 2003, 301:187.
14. Therrien A.S., Balasubramaniam R. Timing and visual feedback constraints on repetitive finger force production. Exp. Brain Res. 2010, 201:673-679.
15. Vaillancourt D.E., Mayka M.A., Thulborn K.R., Corcos D.M. Subthalamic nucleus and internal globus pallidus scale with the rate of change of force production in humans. Neuroimage 2004, 23:175-186.
16. Voss M., Bays P.M., Rothwell J.C., Wolpert D.M. An improvement in perception of self-generated tactile stimuli following theta-burst stimulation of primary motor cortex. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:2712-2717.
17. Wolpert D.M. Probabilistic models in human sensorimotor control. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2007, 26:511-524.
18. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3(Suppl.):1212-1217.