The effect of luting agents and ceramic thickness on the color variation of different ceramics against a chromatic background

European Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 245-252

  Cubas, Gloria Beatriz de Azevedo ^a   Camacho, Guilherme Brião ^a   Demarco, Flávio Fernando ^a   Pereira Cenci, Tatiana ^a  

^a Uninga School of Dentistry   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Ceramics; Color; Luting agents; Thickness

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961242163     PISSN: 13057456     EISSN: 13057464     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698888     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Pippin DJ, Mixson JM, Soldan-Els AP. Clinical evaluation of restored maxillary incisors: veneers vs. PFM crowns. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:1523-1529.
2. Hammad IA, Stein RS. A qualitative study for the bond and color of ceramometals. Part II. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:169-179.
3. Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, Meegdes M, et al. The influence of porcelain layer thickness on the final shade of ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:563-570.
4. Christensen GJ. Facing the challenges of ceramic veneers. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:661-664.
5. Fradeani M, Redemagni M, Corrado M. Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation-a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:9-17.
6. Kihn PW, Barnes DM. The clinical longevity of porcelain veneers: a 48-month clinical evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:747-752.
7. Wee AG, Monaghan P, Johnston WM, Variation in color between intended matched shade and fabricated shade of dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:657-666.
8. Seghi RR, Johnston WM, O'Brien WJ. Spectrophotometric analysis of color differences between porcelain systems. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:35-40.
9. O'Brien WJ, Kay KS, Boenke KM, et al. Sources of color variation on firing porcelain. Dent Mater 1991;7:170-173.
10. Jorgenson MW, Goodkind RJ. Spectrophotometric study of five porcelain shades relative to the dimensions of color, porcelain thickness, and repeated firings. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:96-105.
11. Barghi N. Color and glaze: effects of repeated firings. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:393-395.
12. Raptis NV, Michalakis KX, Hirayama H. Optical behavior of current ceramic systems. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:31-41.
13. Okubo SR, Kanawati A, Richards MW, et al. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:642-648.
14. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:412-417.
15. Antonson SA, Anusavice KJ. Contrast ratio of veneering and core ceramics as a function of thickness. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:316-320.
16. Miyagawa Y, Powers JM. Prediction of color of an esthetic restorative material. J Dent Res 1983;62:581-584.
17. Barath VS, Faber FJ, Westland S, et al. Spectrophotometric analysis of all-ceramic materials and their interaction with luting agents and different backgrounds. Adv Dent Res 2003;17:55-60.
18. CIE. Colorimetry: official recommendations of the International Commission on Illumination. Paris: Commission Internationale de l'Èclairage [International Commission on Illumination], 1976; CIE No. 15 (E-1.3.1).
19. Yilmaz C, Korkmaz T, Demirkoprulu H, et al. Color stability of glazed and polished dental porcelains. J Prosthodont 2008;17:20-24
20. Uludag B, Usumez A, Sahin V, et al. The effect of ceramic thickness and number of firings on the color of ceramic systems: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:25-31.
21. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989;68:819-822.
22. Seghi RR, Johnston WM, O'Brien WJ. Performance assessment of colorimetric devices on dental porcelains. J Dent Res 1989;68:1755-1759.
23. Jarad FD, Moss BW, Youngson CC, et al. The effect of enamel porcelain thickness on color and the ability of a shade guide to prescribe chroma. Dent Mater 2007;23:454-460.
24. Peixoto RT, Paulinelli VM, Sander HH, et al. Light transmission through porcelain. Dent Mater 2007;23:1363-1368.
25. Davis BK, Aquilino SA, Lund PS, et al. Colorimetric evaluation of the effect of porcelain opacity on the resultant color of porcelain veneers. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:130-136.
26. Shokry TE, Shen C, Elhosary MM, et al. Effect of core and veneer thicknesses on the color parameters of two allceramic systems. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:124-129.
27. Della Bona A. Characterizing ceramics and the interfacial adhesion to resin: I- the relationship of microstructure, composition, properties and fractography. J Appl Oral Sci 2005;13:1-9.
28. Denry IL. Recent advances in ceramics for dentistry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996;7:134-143.
29. Chu FCS, Chow TW, Chai J. Contrast ratios and masking ability of three types of ceramic veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:359-364.
30. Spear F, Holloway J. Which all-ceramic system is optimal for anterior esthetics? J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139;19S-24S.
31. Christensen GJ. Ceramic veneers: state of the art. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:1121-1123
32. Powers JM, Dennison JB, Lepeak PJ. Parameters that affect the color of direct restorative resins. J Dent Res 1978;57:876-880.
33. International Commission on Illumination. Colorimetry: Official recommendations of the International Commission on Illumination, Publication CIE No. 15 (E-1,3.1). Paris: Bureau Central de la CIE, 1971.
34. Hunter RS, Harold RW. The measurement of appearance. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987. p. 162-193.
35. Johnston W. Color measurement in dentistry. J Dent 2009;37:e2-e6.