Discourse Coherence and LSA

Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 167-184

  Foltz, Peter W ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55849127580     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203936399-14     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Barzilay, R., and Lapata, M. (2005). Modeling local coherence: An entity-based approach. Proceedings of the 43 Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lingusitics, 141-148.
2. Bowers, C. A., Jentsch, F., Salas, E., andBraun, C. C. (1998). Analyzing communication sequences for team training needs assessment. Human Factors, 40, 672-679.
3. Britton, B. K., andGulgoz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch’s computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329-345.
4. Choi, F., Wiemer-Hastings, P., and Moore, J. (2001). Latent semantic analysis for text segmentation. In L. Lee and D. Harman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 109-117). Philadelphia: Association for Computational Lingusitics.
5. Elvevåg, B., Foltz, P.W., Weinberger, D. R., andGoldberg, T. E. (2006). Coherence and incoherence in speech. Manuscript submitted for publication.
6. Erickson, T. (2002). Discourse architectures: Designing and visualizing computer-mediated conversation. Call For Participation: A Chi 2002 Workshop. Retrieved March 6, 2005, from http://www.visi.com/~snowfall/DA_DiscourseArch02CFP.html
7. Flesch, R.F. (1948). Anewreadabilityyardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221-233.
8. Foltz, P. W. (1996). Latent semantic analysis for text-based research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 28(2), 197-202.
9. Foltz, P.W. (2005). Tools for enhancing team performance through automated modeling of the content of team discourse [Electronic version]. Proceedings of HCI International Conference.
10. Foltz, P.W., Kintsch, W., andLandauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285-307.
11. Gorman, J.C., Foltz, P.W., Kiekel, P. A., Martin, M. A., andCooke, N. J. (2003). Evaluation of latent semantic analysis-based measures of communications content [Electronic version]. Proceedings of the 47 th Annual Human Factors and Ergonomic SocietyMeeting.
12. Grosz, B., Joshi, A. K., andWeinstein, S. (1995). Centering:Aframework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2), 203-225.
13. Grosz, B., and Sidner, C. (1986). Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3), 175-204.
14. Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
15. Hearst, M., (1997). TextTiling: Segmenting text into multi-paragraph subtopic passages. Computational Linguistics, 23(1), 33-64.
16. Hearst, M. A., and Plaut, C. (1993). Subtopic structuring for full-length document access. Proceedings of the 16th Annual InternationalACMSIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 59-68.
17. Karamanis, N., Poesio, M., Mellish, C., and Oberlander, J. (2004). Evaluating centering-based metrics of coherence for text structuring using a reliably annotated corpus. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 391-398.
18. Kaufmann, S. (1999). Cohesion and collocation: Using context vectors in text segmentation. Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 591-595.
19. Kiekel, P.A., Cooke, N. J., Foltz, P.W., Gorman, J., andMartin, M. (2002). Some promising results of communication-based automatic measures of team cognition. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th AnnualMeeting, 298-302.
20. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension:Aconstruction-integration model. Psychological Review, 2, 163-182.
21. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Kintsch, W., andVipond, D. (1979). Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory. In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research (pp. 329-365). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Klare, G. R. (1963). The measurement of readability. Ames, IA: Iowa University Press.
24. Landauer, T. K., Laham, D., andFoltz, P.W. (2003). Automated scoring and annotation of essays with the Intelligent Essay Assessor. Assessment in Education, 10(3), 295-308.
25. Lorch, R. F., Jr., andO’Brien, E. J. (Eds.). (1995). Sources of coherence in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Mann, W. C., andThompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8, 243-281.
27. Marcu, D. (2000). The theory and practice of discourse parsing and summarization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Martin, M., and Foltz, P. W. (2004, May). Automated team discourse annotation and performance prediction using LSA. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology and North American Association for Computational Linguistics Conference (HLT/NAACL), 97-100.
29. McNamara, D. Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., and Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-43.
30. Miltsakaki, E., and Kukich, K. (2000). The role of centering theory’s rough-shift in teaching and evaluation of writing skills. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 408-415.
31. Morris, J., andHirst, G. (1991). Lexical cohesion computed by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text. Computational Linguistics, 17(1), 21-48.
32. Raynar, J.C. (1999). Statistical models for topic segmentation. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 357-364.
33. Sanders, T. J. M., Spooren, W. P. M., and Noordman, L. G. M. (1992). Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 15, 1-35.
34. Slaney, M., and Ponceleon, D. (2001). Hierarchical segmentation: Finding changes in a text signal. Proceedings of the SlAM Text Mining 2001 Workshop, 6-13.
35. Turner, A. A., and Green, E. (1978). Construction and use of a propositional textbase (MS No. 1713). Selected Documents in Psychology, 8(58).