Bayesian learning theory applied to human cognition

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 8-21

  Jacobs, Robert A ^a   Kruschke, John K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961220977     PISSN: 19395078     EISSN: 19395086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcs.80     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Cox RT. The Algebra of Probable Inference. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1961.
2. Busemeyer JR, Diederich A. Cognitive Modeling. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 2010.
3. Scarborough D, Sternberg S. An Invitation to Cognitive Science: Methods, Models and Conceptual Issues, vol 4. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998.
4. Polk TA, Seifert CM. Cognitive Modeling. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002.
5. Sun R. The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
6. Marr D. Vision. New York, NY: Freeman; 1982.
7. Anderson JR. The Adaptive Character of Thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1990.
8. Barlow HB. Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In: Rosenblith W, ed. Sensory Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1961, 217-234.
9. Chater N, Oaksford M. The Probabilistic Mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2008.
10. Geisler WS. Ideal observer analysis. In: Chalupa LM, Werner JS, eds. The Visual Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004, 825-837.
11. Green DM, Swets JA. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1966.
12. Griffiths TL, Kemp C, Tenenbaum JB. Bayesian models of cognition. In: Sun R, ed. The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2008, 59-100.
13. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
14. Knill DC, Richards W. Perception as Bayesian Inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
15. Oaksford M, Chater N. Rational Models of Cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1999.
16. Todorov E. Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nat Neurosc 2004, 7: 907-915.
17. Neapolitan RE. Learning Bayesian Networks. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2004.
18. Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 1988.
19. Russell S, Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2003.
20. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. Bayesian Data Analysis. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall; 2003.
21. Calvert GA, Bullmore ET, Brammer MJ, Campbell R, Williams SCR, et al. Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. Science 1997, 276: 593-596.
22. Pirog Revill K, Aslin RN, Tanenhaus MK, Bavelier D. Neural correlates of partial lexical activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105: 13110-13114.
23. Blakemore S-J, Wolpert D, Frith C. Why can't you tickle yourself? NeuroReport 2000, 11: 11-15.
24. Yuille AL, Bülthoff HH. Bayesian theory and psychophysics. In: Knill D, Richards W, eds. Perception as Bayesian Inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996, 123-161.
25. Ernst MO, Banks MS. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 2002, 415: 429-433.
26. Knill DC, Saunders J. Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? Vision Res 2003, 43: 2539-2558.
27. Alais D, Burr D. The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Curr Biol 2004, 14: 257-262.
28. Battaglia PW, Jacobs RA, Aslin RN. Bayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization. J Opt Soc Am A 2003, 20: 1391-1397.
29. Ghahramani Z, Wolpert DM, Jordan MI. Computational models of sensorimotor integration. In: Morasso PG, Sanguineti V, eds. Self-Organization, Computational Maps, and Motor Control. New York, NY: Elsevier Science; 1997.
30. Jacobs RA. Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth. Vision Res 1999, 39: 3621-3629.
31. Körding KP, Wolpert DM. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 2004, 427: 244-247.
32. Landy MS, Maloney LT, Johnston EB, Young M. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Res 1995, 35: 389-412.
33. Maloney LT, Landy MS. A statistical framework for robust fusion of depth information. Visual Communications Image Processing IV, Proceedings of the SPIE 1199, 1989, 1154-1163.
34. Young MJ, Landy MS, Maloney LT. A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues. Vision Res 1993, 33: 2685-2696.
35. Shanks DR. Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgement. Q J Exp Psychol 1985, 37B: 1-21.
36. Rescorla RA, Wagner AR. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In: Black AH, Prokasy WF, eds. Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1972.
37. Kruschke JK. Bayesian approaches to associative learning: from passive to active learning. Learn Behav 2008, 36: 210-226.
38. Dayan P, Kakade S. Explaining away in weight space. In: Leen T, Dietterich T, Tresp V, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol 13. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001, 451-457.
39. Sobel DM, Tenenbaum JB, Gopnik A. Children's causal inferences from indirect evidence: backwards blocking and Bayesian reasoning in preschoolers. Cogn Sci 2004, 28: 303-333.
40. Tenenbaum JB, Griffiths TL. Theory-based causal inference. In: Becker S, Thrun S, Obermayer K, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003, 35-42.
41. Courville AC, Daw ND, Touretzky DS. Bayesian theories of conditioning in a changing world. Trends Cogn Sci 2006, 10: 295-300.
42. Jacobs RA, Shams L. Visual learning in multisensory environments. Topics Cogn Sci 2009, 2: 217-225.
43. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc B 1977, 39: 1-38.
44. Roweis S, Ghahramani Z. A unifying review of linear Gaussian models. Neural Comput 1999, 11: 305-345.
45. Robinson RW. Counting labeled acyclic digraphs. In: Harary F, ed. New Directions in the Theory of Graphs. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1973, 239-273.
46. MacKay DJC. Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
47. Körding KP, Beierholm U, Ma WJ, Quartz S, Tenenbaum JB, et al. Causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS ONE 2007, 2: e943.
48. Griffiths TL, Sanborn AN, Canini KR, Navarro DJ. Categorization as nonparametric Bayesian density estimation. In: Oaksford M, Chater N, eds. The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Rational Models of Cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2009, 303-328.
49. Kemp C, Tenenbaum JB. The discovery of structural form. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105: 10687-10692.
50. Xu F, Tenenbaum JB. Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychol Rev 2007, 114: 245-272.
51. Tenenbaum JB, Griffiths TL, Kemp C. Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning. Trends Cogn Sci 2006, 10: 309-318.
52. Tenenbaum JB, Griffiths TL, Niyogi S. Intuitive theories as grammars for causal inference. In: Gopnik A, Schulz L, eds. Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2007, 301-322.
53. Goodman ND, Tenenbaum JB, Feldman J, Griffiths TL. A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning. Cogn Sci 2008, 32: 108-154.
54. Kalish ML, Griffiths TL, Lewandowsky S. Iterated learning: intergenerational knowledge transmission reveals inductive biases. Psychon Bull Rev 2007, 14: 288-294.
55. Nelson JD. Finding useful questions: on Bayesian diagnosticity, probability, impact, and information gain. Psychol Rev 2005, 112: 979-999.
56. Oaksford M, Chater N. Optimal data selection: revision, review, and reevaluation. Psychon Bull Rev 2003, 10: 289-318.
57. Steyvers M, Tenenbaum JB, Wagenmakers E-J, Blum B. Inferring causal networks from observations and interventions. Cogn Sci 2003, 27: 453-489.
58. Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, The ABC Research Group. Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1999.
59. Daw ND, Courville AC, Dayan P. Semi-rational models: the case of trial order. In: Chater N, Oaksford M, eds. The Probabilistic Mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2008, 431-452.
60. Brown SD, Steyvers M. Detecting and predicting changes. Cogn Psychol 2009, 58: 49-67.
61. Sanborn A, Griffiths TL, Navarro DJ. A more rational model of categorization. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Vancouver, Canada, 2006.
62. Sanborn A, Silva R. A machine learning perspective on the locally Bayesian model. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009.
63. Shi L, Feldman NH, Griffiths TL. Performing Bayesian inference with exemplar models. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2008.
64. Deneve S. Bayesian spiking neurons II: learning. Neural Comput 2008, 20: 118-145.
65. Kruschke JK. Locally Bayesian learning with applications to retrospective revaluation and highlighting. Psychol Rev 2006, 113: 677-699.
66. Roweis S. EM algorithms for PCA and SPCA. In: Jordan MI, Kearns MJ, Solla SA, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998.
67. Tipping ME, Bishop CM. Probabilistic principal component analysis. J R Stat Soc B 1999, 21: 611-622.