Can masked priming effects be obtained with [InlineMediaObject not available: See fulltext.] words?

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 73, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1643-1649

  Gil López, Cristina ^a   Perea, Manuel ^b   Moret Tatay, Carmen ^b,c   Carreiras, Manuel ^a,d  

^a BASQUE CENTER ON COGNITION   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE VALENCIA SAN VICENTE MÁRTIR   (Spain)

^d BASQUE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HANDWRITING; HUMAN; LEARNING; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HANDWRITING; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 79961195447     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0174-y     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Barnhart, A. S., & Goldinger, S. D. (2010). Interpreting chicken-scratch: Lexical access for handwritten words. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36, 906-923. doi: 10. 1037/a0019258.
2. Bowers, J. S., Vigliocco, G., & Haan, R. (1998). Orthographic, phonological, and articulatory contributions to masked letter and word priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1705-1719. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 24. 6. 1705.
3. Carreiras, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Molinaro, N. (2009). Consonants and vowels contribute differently to visual word recognition: ERPs of relative position priming. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2659-2670. doi: 10. 1093/cercor/bhp019.
4. Davis, C. J., & Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665-671. doi: 10. 3758/BF03192738.
5. Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J.-F., Poline, J.-B., et al. (2001). Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 752-758. doi: 10. 1038/89551.
6. Forster, K. I. (1998). The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 203-233. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1023202116609.
7. Forster, K. I. (2004). Category size effects revisited: Frequency and masked priming effects in semantic categorization. Brain and Language, 90, 276-286. doi: 10. 1016/S0093-934X(03)00440-1.
8. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 10. 4. 680.
9. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116-124. doi: 10. 3758/BF03195503.
10. Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1-35. doi: 10. 1080/01690960701578013.
11. Manso de Zuñiga, C., Evett, L. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1991). Reading by type and by hand: The effects of typography on visual word recognition. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Current issues in word recognition (pp. 10-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Perea, M., Gómez, P., & Fraga, I. (2010). Masked nonword repetition effects in yes/no and go/no-go lexical decision: A test of the evidence accumulation and deadline accounts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17, 369-374. doi: 10. 3758/PBR. 17. 3. 369.
13. Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. D. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 785-794. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 21. 3. 785.
14. Qiao, E., Vinckier, F., Szwed, M., Naccache, L., Valabrègue, R., Dehaene, S., et al. (2010). Unconsciously deciphering handwriting: Subliminal invariance for handwritten words in the visual word form area. NeuroImage, 49, 1786-1799. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuroimage. 2009. 09. 034.
15. Siakaluk, P. D., Buchanan, L., & Westbury, C. (2003). The effect of semantic distance in yes/no and go/no-go semantic categorization tasks. Memory & Cognition, 31, 100-113. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196086.