Random allocation in observational data: How small but robust effects could facilitate hypothesis-free causal inference

Epidemiology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 460-463

  Smith, George Davey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CAUSAL INFERENCE; CAUSAL MODELING; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HEART DISEASE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; NOTE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EPIDEMIOLOGIC RESEARCH DESIGN; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS;

EID: 79961186642     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: 15315487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31821d0426     Document Type: Note

References (45)

1. Taubes G, Mann CC. Epidemiology reaches its limits. Science. 1995; 269:164-169.
2. Bofetta P. False positive results in cancer epidemiology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:988-995.
3. Brignell J. The Epidemiologists: Have They Got Scares for You! London: Brignell Associates; 2004.
4. Brody JE. Vitamin E greatly reduces risk of heart disease, studies suggest. New York Times. May 20th, 1993.
5. Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Ascherio A, et al. Vitamin E consumption and the risk of coronary heart disease in men. N Engl J Med. 1993;328: 1450-1456. (Pubitemid 23143847)
6. Stampfer MJ, Hennekens CH, Manson JE, et al. Vitamin E consumption and the risk of coronary disease in women. N Engl J Med. 1993;328: 1444-1449. (Pubitemid 23143846)
7. Eidelman RS, Hollar D, Hebert PR, et al. Randomized trials of vitamin E in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1552-1556. (Pubitemid 38970477)
8. Northstone K, Joinson C, Emmett P, et al. Are dietary patterns in childhood associated with IQ at 8 years of age? A population-based cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health. In press.
9. Ioannidis J, Tarone R, McLaughlin JK. The false-positive to falsenegative ratio in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology. 2011;22:450-456.
10. Lawlor DA, Davey Smith G, Bruckdorfer KR, et al. Those confounded vitamins: what can we learn from the differences between observational versus randomised trial evidence? Lancet. 2004;363:1724-1727. (Pubitemid 38670332)
11. Connor S. Lab notes: is fast food making children stupid? Don't swallow the stories. The Independent. February 11th, 2011.
12. Phillips A, Davey Smith G. How independent are "independent" effects? Relative risk estimation when correlated exposures are measured imprecisely. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:1223-1231.
13. Phillips AN, Davey Smith G. Bias in relative odds estimation owing to imprecise measurement of correlated exposures. Stats Med. 1992;11: 953-961.
14. Brion M-J, Lawlor DA, Matijasevich A, et al. What are the causal effects of breastfeeding on IQ, obesity and blood pressure? Evidence from comparing high-income and middle-income cohorts. Int J Epidemiol. 2011; doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr020.
15. Davey Smith G. Assessing intrauterine influences on offspring health outcomes: can epidemiological findings yield robust results? Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;102:245-256.
16. Rutter M. Epidemiological methods to tackle causal questions. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38:3-6.
17. Angrist JD, Pischke JS. Most Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2008.
18. Oakes M. Statistical Inference: A Commentary for the Social and Behavioural Sciences. Chichester: Wiley; 1986.
19. Sterne J, Davey Smith G. Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests? BMJ. 2001;322:226-231. (Pubitemid 32116172)
20. Greenland S. Randomization, statistics, and causal inference. Epidemiology. 1990;1:421-429.
21. Colhoun HM, McKeigue PM, Davey Smith G. Problems of reporting genetic associations with complex outcomes. Lancet. 2003;361:865-872. (Pubitemid 36331853)
22. Fisher RA. Statistical methods in genetics [reprint in: Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:335-339]. Heredity. 1952;6:1-12.
23. Davey Smith G. Capitalizing on Mendelian randomization to assess the effects of treatments. J R Soc Med. 2007;100:432-435. Available at: http://www.jameslindlibrary.org/illustrating/articles/capitalising-onmendelian- randomization-to-assess-the-effects-of.pdf.
24. Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S. Mendelian randomization: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:21-25.
25. Davey Smith G, Lawlor DA, Harbord R, et al. Clustered Environments and Randomized Genes: a fundamental distinction between conventional and genetic epidemiology. PLoS Med. 2008;4:1985-1992.
26. Fisher RA. The arrangement of field experiments. J Min Agric G Br. 1926;33:503-513.
27. Box JF, Fisher RA. The Life a Scientist. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1978.
28. Hinkley DV. Contribution to the discussion of Basu's "Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test." J Am Stat Assoc. 1980;75:582-584.
29. Box JF. On RA Fisher's Bateson lecture on statistical methods in genetics. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:335-339.
30. Fisher RA. The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans R Soc Edinb. 1918;52:399-433.
31. Fisher RA, Mackenzie WA. Studies in crop variation. II the manorial response of different potato varieties. J Agric Sci. 1923;13:311-320.
32. Bodmer WF. Commentary: Connections between genetics and statistics: a commentary on Fisher's 1951 Bateson lecture-"Statistical Methods in Genetics." Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:340-344.
33. Finney DJ. Commentary: "Statistical Methods in Genetics" by Sir Ronald A Fisher. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:339-340.
34. Chalmers I. Statistical theory was not the reason that randomization was used in the British medical research councils clinical trial of streptomycin for pulmonary tuberculosis. In: Jorland G, Opinel A, Weisz G, eds. Body Counts: Medical Quantification in Historical and SociologicalPerspectives. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press; 2005:309-334.
35. Davey Smith G. Use of genetic markers and gene-diet interactions for interrogating population-level causal influences of diet on health. Genes Nutr. 2011;6:27-43.
36. Sheehan NA, Didelez V, Burton PR, et al. Mendelian randomisation and causal inference in observational epidemiology. PLoS Med. 2008;5: e177.
37. Thanassoulis G, O'Donnell CJ. Mendelian randomization: nature's randomized trial in the post genome era. JAMA. 2009;301:2386-2388.
38. Shah SH, de Lemos JA. Biomarkers and cardiovascular disease: determining causality and quantifying contribution to risk assessment. JAMA. 2009;302:92-93.
39. Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat Genet. 2010;42:565-569.
40. National Human Genome Research Institution. A catalog of published genome wide association studies. Available at: http://www.genome.gov/gwastudies/.
41. Pierce BL, Ahsan H, VanderWeele TJ. Power and instrument strength requirements for Mendelian randomization studies using multiple genetic variants. Int J Epidemiol. 2011; doi: 10.1093/jie/dyq151.
42. Law MR, Morris JK, Wald NJ. Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies. BMJ. 2009;338:b1665.
43. Timpson NJ, Sayers A, Davey Smith G, Tobias JH. How does body fat influence bone mass in childhood? A Mendelian randomisation approach. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24:522-533.
44. MacGregor AJ, Snieder HH, Schork NJ, Spector TD. Twins-novel uses to study complex traits and genetic diseases. Trends Genet. 2000;16: 131-134. (Pubitemid 30122351)
45. Cole P. The hypothesis generating machine. Epidemiology. 1993;4:271-273. (Pubitemid 23159539)