Belfast intonation and speaker gender

Journal of English Linguistics

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 209-232

  Lowry, Orla ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

intonation; methodological approaches; phonetics; sociolinguistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961181673     PISSN: 00754242     EISSN: 15525457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0075424210380053     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Anderson Anne H.,Bader Miles,Bard Ellen Gurman,Boyle Elizabeth,Doherty Gwyneth,Garrod Simon,Isard Stephen,Kowtko Jacqueline,McAllister Jan,Miller Jim,Sotillo Catherine,Henry S. Thompson,Weinert Regina.The HCRC Map Task Corpus.Language and Speech. 1991;34:351-366.
2. BoersmaPaulWeeninkDavid. 2004. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 4.2. http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat.
3. Britain David.Linguistic change in intonation: The use of high rising terminals in New Zealand English.Language Variation and Change. 1992;4:77-104.
4. Campbell-Kibler Kathryn.The nature of sociolinguistic perception.Language Variation and Change. 2009;21:135-156.
5. Cheshire JennyThe handbook of language variation and change. Chambers J. K.Trudgill PeterSchilling-Estes Natalie, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2003:423-443.
6. Chun DorothyDiscourse intonation in L2: From theory and research to practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2002:.
7. Cruttenden AlanIntonation. 1997. Intonation. 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1997:.
8. Daly Nicola,Warren Paul.Pitching it differently in New Zealand English: Speaker sex and intonation patterns.Journal of Sociolinguistics. 2001;5 (1): 85-96.
9. Douglas-Cowie Ellen,Cowie Roderick,Sneddon Ian,Cox Catherine,Lowry Orla,McRorie Margaret,Jean-Martin Claude,Devillers Laurence,Batliner Anton.The humaine database: Addressing the needs of the affective. 2nd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII'2007), LNCS; 2007; 2007. 488.
10. Eckert Penelope. 79th annual Linguistic Society of America meeting paper; 2005Oakland, CA; 2005.
11. Eckert Penelope.Variation and the indexical field.Journal of Sociolinguistics. 2008;12 (4): 453-476.
12. Eckert Penelope,McConnell-Ginet SallyLanguage and gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2003:.
13. Feld StevenSound and sentiment: Birds, weeping, poetics and song in Kaluli expression. 1990. Sound and sentiment: Birds, weeping, poetics and song in Kaluli expression. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Philadelphia University Press.Philadelphia: Philadelphia University Press; 1990:.
14. Foulkes PaulHandbook of English linguistics. Aarts BaasMcMahon April, ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 2006:625-669.
15. Grabe Esther.Variation adds to prosodic typology. Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference; 2002Aix-en-Provence, France: Laboratoire Parole et Langage; 2002. 127-132.
16. Grabe EstherRegional variation in intonation. Gilles PeterPeters Jorg, ed. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer, Linguistische Arbeiten; 2004:9-31.
17. Grabe Esther,Kochanski Greg,Coleman JohnEnglish pronunciation models: A changing scene. Dziubalska-Kolaczyk KatarzynaPrzedlacka Joanna, ed. Linguistic Insights Series. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang; 2005:311-337.
18. Grabe Esther,Post Bretche.Intonational variation in English. Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference; 2002Aix-en-Provence, France: Laboratoire Parole et Langage; 2002. 343-346.
19. Gussenhoven CarlosIntonation in discourse. Johns-Lewis Catherine, ed. London: Croom Helm; 1986:77-121.
20. Guy Gregory,Horvath Barbara,Vonwiller Julia,Daisley Elaine,Rogers Inge.An intonational change in progress in Australian English.Language in Society. 1986;15:23-52.
21. Guy Gregory,Vonwiller JuliaAustralian English. Collins PeterBlair David, ed. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press; 1989:21-34.
22. Haan Judith,van Heuven Vincent.Male vs. female pitch range in Dutch questions. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Congress of Phonetic Science; 1999; 1999. 1581.
23. Holmes Janet.Setting new standards: Sound changes and gender in New Zealand English.English World-Wide. 1997;18 (1): 107-142.
24. Jarman Eric,Cruttenden Alan.Belfast intonation and the myth of the fall.Journal of the International Phonetics Association. 1976;6:4-12.
25. Johnson KeithThe handbook of speech perception. Remez RobertPisoni David, ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 2005:363-389.
26. Johnson Keith.Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology.Journal of Phonetics. 2006;34:485-499.
27. Kulick DonLanguage ideologies: Practice and theory. Schieffelin Bambi B.Woolard Kathryn A.Kroskrity Paul V., ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1998:87-102.
28. Labov WilliamPrinciples of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 2001:.
29. Ladd D. RobertThe structure of intonational meaning: Evidence from English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1980:.
30. Ladd D. RobertIntonational phonology. 2008. Intonational phonology. 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2008:.
31. Lakoff Robin.Language in context.Language. 1972;48:907-924.
32. Lakoff Robin.Language and women's place.Language in Society. 1973;2:45-80.
33. Lakoff RobinLanguage and women's place. New York:; 1975:.
34. Luce Paul,Pisoni David.Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model.Ear & Hearing. 1998;19:1-36.
35. Lutz CatherineUnnatural emotions: Everyday sentiments on a Micronesian atoll and their challenge to Western theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1988:.
36. Lutz CatherineLanguage and the politics of emotion. Lutz CatherineAbu-Lughod Lila, ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1990:69-91.
37. McConnell-Ginet SallyLanguage and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Thorne BarryKramarae CherisHenley Nancy, ed. Rowley, MA: Newbury House; 1983:69-88.
38. McLemore CynthiaTexas Linguistic Forum. McLemore Cynthia, ed. Austin: University of Texas; 1992:127-147.
39. Moonwomon BirchGender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self. Hall KiraBucholtz Mary, ed. New York: Routledge; 1995:447-468.
40. Munson Benjamin.Lexical characteristics mediate the influence of sex and sex typicality on vowel-space size. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetics Sciences; 2007; 2007. 885.
41. Nolan Francis.Forensic phonetics.Journal of Linguistics. 1991;27:483-493.
42. Ochs ElinorRethinking context. Duranti AlessandroGoodwin Charles, ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1991:335-358.
43. Podesva Robert.Intonational variation and social meaning: Categorical and phonetic aspects.Penn Working Papers in Linguistics. 2006;12 (2): 189-202.
44. Rahilly JoanFocus on Ireland. Kallen Jeffrey L., ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 1997:109-132.
45. Schieffelin BambiThe give and take of everyday life: Language socialization of Kaluli children. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1990:.
46. Theune Mariet,Meijs Koen,Heylen Dirk,Ordelman Roeland.Generating expressive speech for storytelling applications.IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing. 2006;14 (4): 1137-1144.
47. Wells Bill,Peppé SueProsody in conversation: Interactional studies. Couper-Kuhlen ElizabethSelting Margret, ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996:101-130.