Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 262-274

  Steblay, Nancy K ^a   Dietrich, Hannah L ^a   Ryan, Shannon L ^a   Raczynski, Jeanette L ^a   James, Kali A ^a  

^a AUGSBURG COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Eyewitness memory; Lineup laps; Police practice; Sequential lineups

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CRIME; CRIMINAL LAW; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECALL; RECOGNITION; REPRODUCIBILITY; VIDEORECORDING; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CRIME; CRIMINAL LAW; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VIDEO RECORDING; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79961166500     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10979-010-9236-2     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Charman, S. D., & Wells, G. L. (2006). Applied lineup theory. In R. C. L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Memory for people (pp. 219-254). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. SD Charman GL Wells 2007 Eyewitness lineups: Is the appearance change instruction a good idea? Law and Human Behavior 31 3 22 10.1007/s10979-006-9006- 3 16612580 10.1007/s10979-006-9006-3
3. SE Clark RT Howell SL Davey 2008 Regularities in eyewitness identification Law and Human Behavior 32 187 218 10.1007/s10979-006-9082-4 17410411 10.1007/s10979-006-9082-4 (Pubitemid 351692045)
4. S Gaertner J Harrington 2009 Successful eyewitness identification reform: Ramsey County's blind sequential lineup protocol The Police Chief 75 4 130 141
5. SD Gronlund CA Carlson SB Dailey CA Goodsell 2009 Robustness of the sequential lineup advantage Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 15 140 152 10.1037/a0015082 19586253 10.1037/a0015082
6. A Klobuchar NKM Steblay HL Caligiuri 2006 Improving eyewitness identifications: Hennepin County's blind sequential lineup pilot project Cardozo Public Law, Policy and Ethics Journal 2 381 414
7. RCL Lindsay JA Lea JA Fulford 1991 Sequential lineup presentation: Technique matters Journal of Applied Psychology 76 741 745 10.1037/0021-9010.76. 5.741
8. RCL Lindsay GL Wells 1985 Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential presentation Journal of Applied Psychology 70 556 561 10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.556
9. OH MacLin CM Phelan 2007 PC-Eyewitness: Evaluating the New Jersey method Behavior Research Methods 39 242 247 17695351 10.3758/BF03193154
10. CA Meissner CG Tredoux JF Parker OH MacLin 2005 Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups: A dual-process signal detection theory analysis Memory and Cognition 33 783 792 10.3758/BF03193074 (Pubitemid 46202387)
11. JD Pozzulo J Balfour 2006 Children and adults' eyewitness identification accuracy when a culprit changes his appearance: Comparing simultaneous and elimination lineup procedures Legal and Criminological Psychology 11 25 34 10.1348/135532505X52626 (Pubitemid 43237332)
12. JD Pozzulo KL Warren 2003 Descriptions and identifications of strangers by youth and adult eyewitnesses Journal of Applied Psychology 84 167 176 10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.167
13. PN Shapiro S Penrod 1986 Meta-analysis of facial identification studies Psychological Bulletin 100 139 156 10.1037/0033-2909.100.2.139
14. Steblay, N., Dysart, J., Fulero, S., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2001). Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 459-473. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1394515. (Pubitemid 33743582)
15. Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Accuracy. (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Research Report.
16. Tredoux, C. G. (1998). Statistical inference on measures of lineup fairness. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 217-237. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1394144. (Pubitemid 28178219)
17. T Valentine S Darling A Memon 2007 Do strict rules and moving images increase the reliability of the sequential identification procedures? Applied Cognitive Psychology 21 933 949 10.1002/acp.1306 10.1002/acp.1306 (Pubitemid 350167936)
18. GL Wells 1984 The psychology of lineup identifications Journal of Applied Social Psychology 36 1546 1557
19. GL Wells 1993 What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist 48 553 571 8507052 10.1037/0003-066X.48.5.553
20. GL Wells MR Leippe TM Ostrom 1979 Guidelines for empirically assessing the fairness of a lineup Law and Human Behavior 3 285 293 10.1007/BF01039807
21. GL Wells RCL Lindsay 1980 On estimating the diagnosticity of eyewitness nonidentifications Psychological Bulletin 88 776 784 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.776
22. GL Wells RS Malpass RCL Lindsay RP Fisher JW Turtle SM Fulero 2000 From the lab to the police station: A successful application of eyewitness research American Psychologist 55 581 598 10.1037//0003-066X.55.6.581.10 10892200 10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.581
23. GL Wells A Memon SD Penrod 2006 Eyewitness evidence: Improving its probative value Psychological Science in the Public Interest 7 2 45 75 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00027.x
24. GL Wells EA Olson 2002 Eyewitness identification: Information gain from incriminating and exonerating behaviors Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 8 155 167 10.1037//1076-898X.8.3.155 12240928 10.1037/1076-898X.8.3.155
25. Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 603-647. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1394446. (Pubitemid 29009203)
26. GL Wells J Turtle 1986 Eyewitness identification: The importance of lineup models Psychological Bulletin 99 320 329 10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.320