A sternal accelerometer does not impair hemodynamics during piglet CPR

Resuscitation

Volumn 82, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1231-1234

  Zuercher, Mathias ^a,b   Hilwig, Ronald W ^a   Gura, Mike ^a   Nysaether, Jon ^c   Nadkarni, Vinay M ^d   Berg, Marc D ^a,e   Kern, Karl B ^e   Berg, Robert A ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

^c Laerdal Medical Corporation   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac arrest; Chest compressions; CPR; CPR quality; Leaning; Pediatric; Swine

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; AORTA; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HEART ARREST; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART MUSCLE; HEART OUTPUT; HEART RIGHT ATRIUM PRESSURE; HEART VENTRICLE FIBRILLATION; HEMODYNAMICS; MALE; NONHUMAN; PIGLET; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESUSCITATION; STERNAL ACCELEROMETER FORCE FEEDBACK DEVICE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; WEIGHT;

ACCELERATION; ANIMALS; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; CORONARY CIRCULATION; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEART ARREST; HEMODYNAMICS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REFERENCE VALUES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STERNUM; SURVIVAL RATE; SWINE; VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION;

EID: 79961128184     PISSN: 03009572     EISSN: 18731570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.04.015     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Gallagher E.J., Lombardi G., Gennis P. Effectiveness of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 1995, 274:1922-1925.
2. Wik L., Steen P.A., Bircher N.G. Quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation influences outcome after prehospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 1994, 28:195-203.
3. Harve H., Jokela J., Tissari A., et al. Defibrillation and the quality of layperson cardiopulmonary resuscitation-dispatcher assistance or training?. Resuscitation 2009, 80:275-277.
4. Olasveengen T.M., Wik L., Kramer-Johansen J., Sunde K., Pytte M., Steen P.A. Is CPR quality improving? A retrospective study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2007, 75:260-266.
5. Wik L., Kramer-Johansen J., Myklebust H., et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005, 293:299-304.
6. Abella B.S., Alvarado J.P., Myklebust H., et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005, 293:305-310.
7. Abella B.S., Sandbo N., Vassilatos P., et al. Chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal: a prospective study during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2005, 111:428-434.
8. Wik L., Myklebust H., Auestad B.H., Steen P.A. Twelve-month retention of CPR skills with automatic correcting verbal feedback. Resuscitation 2005, 66:27-30.
9. Dine C.J., Gersh R.E., Leary M., Riegel B.J., Bellini L.M., Abella B.S. Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and resuscitation training by combining audiovisual feedback and debriefing. Crit Care Med 2008, 36:2817-2822.
10. Havel C., Schreiber W., Trimmel H., et al. Quality of closed chest compression on a manikin in ambulance vehicles and flying helicopters with a real time automated feedback. Resuscitation 2010, 81:59-64.
11. Kramer-Johansen J., Myklebust H., Wik L., et al. Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: a prospective interventional study. Resuscitation 2006, 71:283-292.
12. Abella B.S., Edelson D.P., Kim S., et al. CPR quality improvement during in-hospital cardiac arrest using a real-time audiovisual feedback system. Resuscitation 2007, 73:54-61.
13. Kern K.B., Figge G., Hilwig R.W., et al. Active compression-decompression versus standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model: no improvement in outcome. Am Heart J 1996, 132:1156-1162.
14. Zuercher M., Hilwig R.W., Ranger-Moore J., et al. Leaning during chest compressions impairs cardiac output and left ventricular myocardial blood flow in piglet cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 2010, 38:1141-1146.
15. Berg R.A., Hemphill R., Abella B.S., et al. Part 5: adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010, 122:S685-S705.
16. Berg R.A., Sanders A.B., Kern K.B., et al. Adverse hemodynamic effects of interrupting chest compressions for rescue breathing during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Circulation 2001, 104:2465-2470.
17. Halperin H.R., Tsitlik J.E., Guerci A.D., et al. Determinants of blood flow to vital organs during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs. Circulation 1986, 73:539-550.
18. Halperin H.R., Paradis N., Ornato J.P., et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a novel chest compression device in a porcine model of cardiac arrest: improved hemodynamics and mechanisms. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 44:2214-2220.
19. Berg R.A., Kern K.B., Hilwig R.W., Ewy G.A. Assisted ventilation during 'bystander' CPR in a swine acute myocardial infarction model does not improve outcome. Circulation 1997, 96:4364-4371.
20. Berg R.A., Kern K.B., Hilwig R.W., et al. Assisted ventilation does not improve outcome in a porcine model of single-rescuer bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 1997, 95:1635-1641.
21. Berkowitz I.D., Gervais H., Schleien C.L., Koehler R.C., Dean J.M., Traystman R.J. Epinephrine dosage effects on cerebral and myocardial blood flow in an infant swine model of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Anesthesiology 1991, 75:1041-1050.