Bone edema on magnetic resonance imaging is an independent predictor of rheumatoid arthritis development in patients with early undifferentiated arthritis

Arthritis and Rheumatism

Volumn 63, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 2192-2202

  Duer Jensen, Anne ^a   Hoørslev Petersen, Kim ^b   Hetland, Merete Lund ^a   Bak, Lene ^c   Ejbjerg, Bo Jannik ^d   Hansen, Michael Sejer ^e   Johansen, Julia Sidenius ^a   Lindegaard, Hanne Merete ^b   Vinterberg, Henrik ^f   Moøller, Jakob M ^a   Oøstergaard, Mikkel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c KOLDING HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^d SLAGELSE HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^e GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^f Amagerbrogade   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RHEUMATOID FACTOR;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHRITIS; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMISTRY; BONE EDEMA; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDEMA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERPHALANGEAL JOINT; JOINT SWELLING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METACARPOPHALANGEAL JOINT; METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; WRIST;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; BONE DISEASES; DISEASE PROGRESSION; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EDEMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; WRIST JOINT;

EID: 79961117357     PISSN: 00043591     EISSN: 15290131     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/art.30396     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Tamai M, Kawakami A, Uetani M, Takao S, Arima K, Iwamoto N, et al. A prediction rule for disease outcome in patients with undifferentiated arthritis using magnetic resonance imaging of the wrists and finger joints and serologic autoantibodies. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61: 772-8.
2. Van der Helm-van Mil AH, le Cessie S, van Dongen H, Breedveld FC, Toes RE, Huizinga TW,. A prediction rule for disease outcome in patients with recent-onset undifferentiated arthritis: how to guide individual treatment decisions. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 56: 433-40.
3. Visser H, le Cessie S, Vos K, Breedveld FC, Hazes JM,. How to diagnose rheumatoid arthritis early: a prediction model for persistent (erosive) arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 357-65. (Pubitemid 34136572)
4. Van Gaalen FA, Linn-Rasker SP, van Venrooij WJ, de Jong BA, Breedveld FC, Verweij CL, et al. Autoantibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptides predict progression to rheumatoid arthritis in patients with undifferentiated arthritis: a prospective cohort study. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 709-15. (Pubitemid 38326168)
5. Van der Linden MP, van der Woude D, Ioan-Facsinay A, Levarht EW, Stoeken-Rijsbergen G, Huizinga TW, et al. Value of anti-modified citrullinated vimentin and third-generation anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide compared with second-generation anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide and rheumatoid factor in predicting disease outcome in undifferentiated arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 60: 2232-41.
6. Sugimoto H, Takeda A, Hyodoh K,. Early-stage rheumatoid arthritis: prospective study of the effectiveness of MR imaging for diagnosis. Radiology 2000; 216: 569-75. (Pubitemid 30599883)
7. Van der Helm-van Mil AH, Detert J, le Cessie S, Filer A, Bastian H, Burmester GR, et al. Validation of a prediction rule for disease outcome in patients with recent-onset undifferentiated arthritis: moving toward individualized treatment decision-making. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 58: 2241-7.
8. Ostergaard M, Ejbjerg B, Szkudlarek M,. Imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis: roles of magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, conventional radiography and computed tomography. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2005; 19: 91-116. (Pubitemid 40003943)
9. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988; 31: 315-24. (Pubitemid 18091653)
10. Moll JM, Wright V,. Psoriatic arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1973; 3: 55-78.
11. Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand. Arthritis Rheum 1990; 33: 1601-10.
12. Wallace SL, Robinson H, Masi AT, Decker JL, McCarty DJ, Yu TF,. Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout. Arthritis Rheum 1977; 20: 895-900.
13. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR,. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980; 23: 137-45. (Pubitemid 10164318)
14. Ostergaard M, Peterfy C, Conaghan P, McQueen F, Bird P, Ejbjerg B, et al. OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging studies: core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system [published erratum appears in J Rheumatol 2004;31:198]. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 1385-6. (Pubitemid 36666373)
15. Solau-Gervais E, Legrand JL, Cortet B, Duquesnoy B, Flipo RM,. Magnetic resonance imaging of the hand for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis in the absence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies: a prospective study. J Rheumatol 2006; 33: 1760-5. (Pubitemid 44373207)
16. Emad Y, Shehata M, Ragab Y, Saad A, Hamza H, Abou-Zeid A,. Prevalence and predictive value of anti-cyclic citrullinated protein antibodies for future development of rheumatoid arthritis in early undifferentiated arthritis. Mod Rheumatology 2010; 20: 358-65.
17. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62: 2569-81.
18. Ejbjerg B, Narvestad E, Rostrup E, Szkudlarek M, Jacobsen S, Thomsen HS, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of wrist and finger joints in healthy subjects occasionally shows changes resembling erosions and synovitis as seen in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 1097-106. (Pubitemid 38480819)
19. Palosaari K, Vuotila J, Soini I, Kaarela K, Kautiainen H, Hakala M,. Small bone lesions resembling erosions can frequently be found in bilateral wrist MRI of healthy individuals. Scand J Rheumatol 2009; 38: 450-4.
20. Hetland ML, Ejbjerg B, Horslev-Petersen K, Jacobsen S, Vestergaard A, Jurik AG, et al, and the CIMESTRA Study Group. MRI bone oedema is the strongest predictor of subsequent radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from a 2-year randomised controlled trial (CIMESTRA). Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 384-90.
21. Haavardsholm EA, Boyesen P, Ostergaard M, Schildvold A, Kvien TK,. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in 84 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: bone marrow oedema predicts erosive progression. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 794-800. (Pubitemid 351843277)
22. McQueen FM, Benton N, Perry D, Crabbe J, Robinson E, Yeoman S, et al. Bone edema scored on magnetic resonance imaging scans of the dominant carpus at presentation predicts radiographic joint damage of the hands and feet six years later in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 1814-27. (Pubitemid 36828675)
23. McQueen FM, Dalbeth N,. Predicting joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis using MRI scanning. Arthritis Res Ther 2009; 11: 124.
24. Mundwiler ML, Maranian P, Brown DH, Silverman JM, Wallace D, Khanna D, et al. The utility of MRI in predicting radiographic erosions in the metatarsophalangeal joints of the rheumatoid foot: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther 2009; 11: R94.
25. Ostendorf B, Scherer A, Modder U, Schneider M,. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging of the forefeet in early rheumatoid arthritis when findings on imaging of the metacarpophalangeal joints of the hands remain normal. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 2094-102. (Pubitemid 38924386)
26. Ejbjerg BJ, Narvestad E, Jacobsen S, Thomsen HS, Ostergaard M,. Optimised, low cost, low field dedicated extremity MRI is highly specific and sensitive for synovitis and bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist and finger joints: comparison with conventional high field MRI and radiography. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 1280-7. (Pubitemid 41206243)
27. Savnik A, Malmskov H, Thomsen HS, Bretlau T, Graff LB, Nielsen H, et al. MRI of the arthritic small joints: comparison of extremity MRI (0.2 T) vs high-field MRI (1.5 T). Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 1030-8. (Pubitemid 32755570)
28. Prevoo ML, van 't Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL,. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts: development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 44-8.