Nonequilibrium transport in the Anderson model of a biased quantum dot: Scattering Bethe ansatz phenomenology

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 83, Issue 19, 2011, Pages

  Chao, Sung Po ^a   Palacios, Guillaume ^a,b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961116324     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.195314     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. D. Goldhaber-Gordon, H. Strickman, D. Mahalu, D. Abusch-Magder, U. Meirav, and M. A. Kastner, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/34373 391, 156 (1998); (Pubitemid 28092469)
2. M. Grobis, I. G. Rau, R. M. Potok, H. Shtrikman, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.246601 100, 246601 (2008).
3. J. Schmid, J. Weis, K. Eberl, and K. Von Klitzing, Physica B PHYBE3 0921-4526 10.1016/S0921-4526(98)00533-X 258, 182 (1998).
4. S. M. Cronenwett, T. H. Oosterkamp, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.281.5376.540 281, 540 (1998). (Pubitemid 28357364)
5. S. M. Cronenwett, H. J. Lynch, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, L. P. Kouwenhoven, C. M. Marcus, K. Hirose, N. S. Wingreen, and V. Umansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.226805 88, 226805 (2002).
6. W. G. van der Wiel, S. De Franceschi, T. Fujisawa, J. M. Elzerman, S. Tarucha, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.289. 5487.2105 289, 2105 (2000).
7. J. Park, A. N. Pasupathy, J. I. Goldsmith, C. Chang, Y. Yaish, J. R. Petta, M. Rinkoski, J. P. Sethna, H. D. Abruna, P. L. McEuen, and D. C. Ralph, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature00791 417, 722 (2002). (Pubitemid 34649374)
8. P. B. Wiegman and A. M. Tsvelik, J. Phys. C JPSOAW 0022-3719 10.1088/0022-3719/16/12/017 16, 2281 (1983);
9. P. B. Wiegman and A. M. Tsvelik, Adv. Phys. ADPHAH 0001-8732 10.1080/00018738300101581 32, 453 (1983).
10. N. Kawakami and A. Okiji, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. JUPSAU 0031-9015 10.1143/JPSJ.51.1145 51, 1145 (1982);
11. N. Kawakami and A. Okiji, Solid State Commun. SSCOA4 0038-1098 10.1016/0038-1098(82)91170-X 43, 365 (1982).
12. T. K. Ng and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1768 61, 1768 (1988).
13. L. I. Glazman and M. E. Raikh, Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 378 (1988)
14. L. I. Glazman and M. E. Raikh, [JETP Lett. 47, 452 (1988)].
15. N. Wingreen and Y. Meir, Phys. Rev. B PRLTAO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.11040 49, 11040 (1994).
16. M. Pustilnik and L. I. Glazman, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.216601 87, 216601 (2001).
17. M H. Hettler and H. Schoeller, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4907 74, 4907 (1995).
18. A. Oguri, Phys. Rev. B PRLTAO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.153305 64, 153305 (2001).
19. A. Oguri, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. JUPSAU 0031-9015 10.1143/JPSJ.74.110 74, 110 (2005). (Pubitemid 41284367)
20. Z. Ratiani and A. Mitra, Phys. Rev. B JUPSAU 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.245111 79, 245111 (2009).
21. A. Rosch, J. Kroha, and P. Wölfle, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.156802 87, 156802 (2001).
22. K. S. Thygesen and A. Rubio, Phys. Rev. B PRLTAO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.115333 77, 115333 (2008).
23. L. G. G. V. Dias da Silva, F. Heidrich-Meisner, A. E. Feiguin, C. A. Busser, G. B. Martins, E. V. Anda, and E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. B PRLTAO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.195317 78, 195317 (2008).
24. J. Eckel, F. Heidrich-Meisner, S. G. Jakobs, M. Thorwart, M. Pletyukhov, and R. Egger, New J. Phys. 10.1088/1367-2630/12/4/043042 12, 043042 (2010).
25. F. Heidrich-Meisner, A. E. Feiguin, and E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. B PRLTAO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.235336 79, 235336 (2009).
26. R. V. Roermund, S.-Y. Shiau, and M. Lavagna, Phys. Rev. B 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.165115 81, 165115 (2010).
27. D. Matsumoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. JUPSAU 0031-9015 10.1143/JPSJ.69.1449 69, 1449 (2000).
28. C. D. Spataru, M. S. Hybertsen, S. G. Louie, and A. J. Millis, Phys. Rev. B JUPSAU 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.155110 79, 155110 (2009).
29. P. Mehta and N. Andrei, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.216802 96, 216802 (2006); (Pubitemid 43837741)
30. P. Mehta and N. Andrei, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.086804 100, 086804 (2008). (Pubitemid 351399004)
31. See also e-print arXiv: cond-mat/0702612 (to be published) for more detailed discussion of techniques of SBA and e-print arXiv: cond-mat/0703426 (to be published).
32. A. Schiller and N. Andrei, e-print arXiv: 0710.0249 (to be published).
33. E. Boulat and H. Saleur, Phys. Rev. B JUPSAU 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.033409 77, 033409 (2008).
34. E. Boulat, H. Saleur, and P. Schmitteckert, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.140601 101, 140601 (2008).
35. J. S. Langer and V. Ambegaokar, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.121.1090 121, 1090 (1961).
36. D. C. Langreth, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.150.516 150, 516 (1966).
37. R. M. Konik, H. Saleur, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.236801 87, 236801 (2001).
38. R. M. Konik, H. Saleur, and A. Ludwig, Phys. Rev. B PRLTAO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.125304 66, 125304 (2002).
39. P. Fendley, A. W. W. Ludwig, and H. Saleur, Phys. Rev. B PRLTAO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.8934 52, 8934 (1995).
40. P. Fendley, A. W. W. Ludwig, and H. Saleur, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3005 74, 3005 (1995).
41. A renormalizable Hamiltonian such as the Anderson model requires regularization and a cutoff scheme to define it. The results are universal once the cutoff is removed. In intermediate stages as the cut off is finite it is important to adopt a scheme that does not break integrability. The scheme adopted here satisfies this requirement. See N. Andrei, K. Furuya, and J. H. Lowenstein, Rev. Mod. Phys. 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.55.331 55, 331 (1983), Sec. VI.
42. Without the regularization factor in the odd sector the model is still integrable. However, it is not possible to identify the fixed number of incoming particles by this choice, A. Nishino and N. Hatano, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. JUPSAU 0031-9015 10.1143/JPSJ.76.063002 76, 063002 (2007).
43. It is also possible to construct scattering eigenstate not in the Bethe ansatz form. See J. T. Shen and S. Fan, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.153003 98, 153003 (2007); (Pubitemid 46589311)
44. A. Nishino, T. Imamura, and N. Hatano, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.146803 102, 146803 (2009)
45. for IRLM, and the two-particle state for Anderson model in T. Imamura, A. Nishino, and N. Hatano, Phys. Rev. B PRLTAO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.80. 245323 80, 245323 (2009). It is, however, difficult to find a consistent way to write an N -particles eigenstate through this approach.
46. The TBA proof of ground-state configuration for two leads case was done by C. J. Bolech and then by S. P. Chao. The idea is to write down finite-temperature free energy for two leads system at different chemical potentials and find the lowest energy state as temperature is taken to zero. The ground state is shown to be formed by complex solutions originated from poles (zeros) of two particle S matrices. For details, see S. P. Chao, Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers University, 2010.
47. P. Schlottmann, Z. Phys. B ZPCMDN 0722-3277 10.1007/BF01445293 52, 127 (1983).
48. N. Kawakami and A. Okiji, Phys. Rev. B PRLTAO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.2383 42, 2383 (1990).
49. D. K. K. Lee and P. A. Lee, Physica B PHYBE3 0921-4526 10.1016/S0921-4526(98)01106-5 259-261, 481 (1999).
50. This dressed energy is the sum of the dressed energy of spinon and that of antiholon near the equilibrium Fermi surface.
51. N. Andrei, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/0375-9601(82)90702-2 87, 299 (1982).
52. A. O. Gogolin, R. M. Konik, A. W. W. Ludwig, and H. Saleur, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) ANPYA2 0003-3804 10.1002/andp.200710262 16, 678 (2007). (Pubitemid 350075346)
53. 2 given by free energy and voltage computed by difference in particle number.
54. F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 40.416 40, 416 (1978).
55. E. Lebanon and A. Schiller, Phys. Rev. B PRLTAO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.035308 65, 035308 (2001).
56. A. C. Hewson, A. Oguri, and D. Meyer, Eur. Phys. J. B EPJBFY 1434-6028 10.1140/epjb/e2004-00256-0 40, 177 (2004).
57. J. Paaske and K. Flensberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.176801 94, 176801 (2005). (Pubitemid 41492286)
58. A. C. Hewson, The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).
59. Here we adopted the Kondo scale as in the article by N. S. Wingreen and Y. Meir, Phys. Rev. B PRLTAO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.11040 49, 11040 (1994). We use a factor of √ 10 to increase this scale so the Kondo peak can be observed more easily in numerics.