Fermi-liquid theory for the Anderson model out of equilibrium

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 64, Issue 15, 2001, Pages

  Oguri, Akira ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; ELECTRON; ELEMENTARY PARTICLE; ENERGY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MODEL; TEMPERATURE; THEORY;

EID: 0035887529     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.153305     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. A C. Hewson, The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).
2. D. Goldharber-Gordon, H. Shtrikman, D. Mahalu, D. Abusch-Magder, U. Meirav, and M A. Kastner, Nature (London)391, 156 (1998);
3. S M. Cronenwett, T H. Oosterkamp, and L P. Kouwenhoven, Science281, 540 (1998);
4. F. Simmel, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 804 (1999).
5. T K. Ng and P A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 1768 (1988);
6. L I. Glazman and M E. Raikh, Pis’ma Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 378 (1988) [JETP Lett.47, 452 (1988)].
7. S. Hershfield, J H. Davies, and J W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. B46, 7046 (1992).
8. N S. Wingreen and Y. Meir, Phys. Rev. B49, 11 040 (1994).
9. A. Schiller and S. Hershfield, Phys. Rev. B51, 12 896 (1995).
10. P. Nozières, J. Low Temp. Phys.17, 31 (1974).
11. K. Yamada, Prog. Theor. Phys.53, 970 (1975);
12. Prog. Theor. Phys.K. Yamada54, 316 (1975);
13. Prog. Theor. Phys.K. Yosida and K. Yamada, 53, 1286 (1975).
14. A. Yoshimori, Prog. Theor. Phys.55, 67 (1976).
15. V. Zlatić and B. Horvatić, Phys. Rev. B28, 6904 (1983).
16. A. Oguri, Phys. Rev. B63, 115305 (2001);
17. A. OguriJ. Phys. Soc. Jpn.66, 1427 (1997).
18. L V. Keldysh, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 1515 (1964) [Sov. Phys. JETP20, 1018 (1965)];
19. C. Caroli, R. Combescot, P. Nozieres, and D. Saint-James, J. Phys. C4, 916 (1971).
20. We have used the notation given by E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii, Physical Kinetics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1981).
21. Y. Meir and N S. Wingreen, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 2512 (1992). Note that their definition of (formula presented) and (formula presented) are different slight from ours (by a factor (formula presented).
22. The low-energy behavior of (formula presented) given in the electron-hole symmetric case in Ref. 8 holds also in the asymmetric case just by replacing the coefficient (formula presented) by a general expression (formula presented) (Ref. 9). See also discussions below Eq. (16).
23. G M. Éliashberg, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 41, 1241 (1961) [JETP14, 886 (1962)];
24. JETPG M. Éliashberg42, 1658 (1962) [ 14, 1151 (1962)].