Suppression of finite-size effects in one-dimensional correlated systems

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 83, Issue 5, 2011, Pages

  Gendiar, A ^a,b,c   Danika, M ^a,d   Lee, Y ^a,c   Nishino, T ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS   (Slovakia)

^b INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING   (Slovakia)

^c KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d Physics and Informatics   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATED SYSTEMS; EXTENDED HUBBARD MODEL; FINITE SIZE EFFECT; GROUND-STATE ENERGIES; LOCAL ENERGY; NON-UNIFORM DEFORMATION; PERIODIC BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; POSITIVE INTEGERS; QUANTUM SYSTEM; SITE INDEX; SMOOTH BOUNDARY; SYSTEM SIZE;

DEFORMATION; QUANTUM ELECTRONICS; QUANTUM OPTICS;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS;

EID: 79961096060     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.052118     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. M. E. Fisher and M. N. Barber, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.28.1516 28, 1516 (1972).
2. M. N. Barber, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by, C. Domb, and, J. L. Lebowitz, Vol. 8 (Academic, New York, 1983).
3. T. W. Burkhardt and J. M. J. van Leewen, Real-Space Renormalization, Topics in Current Physics, Vol. 30 (Springer, Berlin, 1982), and references therein.
4. S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69. 2863 69, 2863 (1992);
5. S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B PLRBAQ 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.10345 48, 10345 (1993).
6. I. Peshel, X. Wang, M. Kaulke, and K. Hallberg, Density-Matrix Renormalization, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 528 (Springer, Berlin, 1999).
7. U. Schollwöck, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys. 77.259 77, 259 (2005). (Pubitemid 41490660)
8. F. Verstraete, D. Porras, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.227205 93, 227205 (2004). (Pubitemid 40072806)
9. P. Pippan, S. R. White, and H. G. Evertz, Phys. Rev. B PLRBAQ 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.081103 81, 081103 (R) (2010).
10. D. Rossini, V. Giovannetti, and R. Fazio, e-print arXiv: 1102.3562v1 [quant-ph].
11. D. Rossini, V. Giovannetti, and R. Fazio, e-print arXiv: 1102.3545v2 [cond-mat.str-el].
12. M. Vekić and S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.4283 71, 4283 (1993).
13. M. Vekić and S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B PLRBAQ 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.14552 53, 14552 (1996).
14. A. Gendiar, R. Krcmar, and T. Nishino, Prog. Theor. Phys. PTPKAV 0033-068X 10.1143/PTP.122.953 122, 953 (2009).
15. The deformation function used in Ref. [13] is [sin (j π / N)] 2, although all the deformed Hamiltonians are denoted with the wrong exponent in the term [sin (j π / N)]. This mistake by the authors of Ref. [13] was corrected in the Erratum: A. Gendiar, R. Krcmar, and T. Nishino, Prog. Theor. Phys. PTPKAV 0033-068X 10.1143/PTP.123.393 123, 393 (2010).
16. T. Hikihara and T. Nishino, Phys. Rev. B PLRBAQ 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.060414 83, 060414 (R) (2011).
17. Another generalization is to replace the sinusoidal function by the hyperbolic function: H. Ueda, A. Gendiar, V. Zauner, T. Iharagi, and T. Nishino, e-print arXiv: 1008.3458v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech].