Immediate feedback and opportunity to revise answers: Application of a graded response IRT model

Applied Psychological Measurement

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 472-479

  Attali, Yigal ^a  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

constructed response items; feedback; graded response model; IRT; revision

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961073145     PISSN: 01466216     EISSN: 15523497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146621610381755     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Attali, Y., & Powers, D. (2008). Effect of immediate feedback and revision on psychometric properties of open-ended GRE Subject Test items (ETS Research Report No. RR-08-21, GRE Research Report No. GREB-04-05). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
2. Attali Y.,Powers D.Immediate feedback and opportunity to revise answers to open-ended questions.Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2010;70:22-35.
3. Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic testing with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic testing (pp. 82-115). New York, NY: Guilford.
4. Epstein M. L.,Epstein B. B.,Brosvic G. M.Immediate feedback during academic testing.Psychological Reports. 2001;88:889-894.
5. Gilman D.,Ferry P.Increasing test reliability through self-scoring procedures.Journal of Educational Measurement. 1972;9:205-207.
6. Grigorenko E. L.,Sternberg R. J.Dynamic testing.Psychological Bulletin. 1998;124:75-111.
7. Kulhavy R. W.,Stock W. A.Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude.Educational Psychology Review. 1989;1:279-308.
8. Masters G. N.A Rasch model for partial credit scoring.Psychometrika. 1982;47:149-174.
9. Masters, G. N., & Wright, B. D. (1996). The partial credit model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 101-122). New York, NY: Springer.
10. Muraki E.A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm.Applied Psychological Measurement. 1992;16:159-176.
11. Pressey S. L.A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores-and teaches.School and Society. 1926;23 (586): 373-376.
12. Samejima F.Estimation of ability using a response pattern of graded scores.Psychometrika Monograph. 1969;No. 17:.
13. Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85-100). New York, NY: Springer.
14. Schmidt R. A.,Young D. E.,Swinnen S.,Shapiro D. C.Summary knowledge results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 1989;15:352-359.
15. Schooler, L. J., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). The disruptive potential of immediate feedback. In Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Thissen, D., Chen, W.-H., & Bock, R. D. (2003). MULTILOG (Version 7.03) [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
17. Thissen D.,Steinberg L.A taxonomy of item response models.Psychometrika. 1986;51:567-577.