Formulation design and evaluation of bilayer buccal tablets of granisetron hydrochloride

Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 242-247

  Swamy, P V ^a   Kinagi, M B ^a   Biradar, S S ^a   Gada, S N ^a   Shilpa, H ^a  

^a HKE Society's College of Pharmacy   (India)

Author keywords

Buccal tablets; Carbopol 934p; Granisetron hydrochloride; HMPC 50 cps; Sodium alginate

Indexed keywords

GRANISETRON;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG RELEASE; DRUG SOLUBILITY; DRUG STABILITY; EXCIPIENT COMPATIBILITY; IN VITRO STUDY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MUCOADHESION; TABLET COMPRESSION; TABLET FORMULATION; TABLET FRIABILITY; TABLET HARDNESS; TABLET THICKNESS; WATER ABSORPTION;

EID: 79961045208     PISSN: 00195464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Langer MA, Robinson RJ. Sustained release drug delivery systems In: Remington's Pharmaceutical th Sciences, Gennaro AR (Ed.), 17 edition, New York: Mack Publishing Company; 1985. p. 1644-61.
2. Vyas SP, Khar KR, editors. Controlled drug delivery st concepts and advances, 1 ed. NewDelhi: Vallabh Prakashan; 2002. p. 292.
3. Tripathi KD. Essentials of Medical Pharmacology, 4 ed. Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Publishers (P) Ltd; 1999. p. 189-90.
4. Laurence LB, John SL, Keith LP, editors. Goodman and th Gilman's The Pharmacologic Basis of Therapeutics. 11 ed. New York: McGraw Hill Publishing Company; 2006. p. 1000-3.
5. Linda S, Crawford SM, Taylor PA. The comparative effectiveness of ondansetron and granisetron in once daily dosage in the prevention of nausea and vomiting caused by cisplatin: a double blind clinical trial. The Pharm J 2000; 265 (7104): 59-62.
6. Sweetman SC, editor. Martindale: The Complete Drug rd Reference, 33 ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2002. p. 1227-8.
7. Paul Beringer, editor. Remington's Science and Practice st of Pharmacy, 21 ed. Baltimore, Maryland (USA): Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Publishing Company; 2005. p.1311.
8. Marianne Tan. Granisetron: new insights into its use for the treatment of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2003: 4 (9): 1563-71.
9. Nakhat PD, Kondawar AA, Babla IV, Rathi LG, Yeole PG. Studies on buccoadhesive tablets of terbutaline sulphate. Indian J Pharm Sci 2007; 69(4): 505-10.
10. Vishnu M. Patel, Bhupendra G Prajapati, Harsha V Patel, Karshanbhi M Patel. Mucoadhesive bilayer tablets of propranolol hydrochloride. AAPS PharmSciTech 2007; 8(3):E1-E6.
11. Prasad BK, Remeth JD, Kailas KM, Vijay DH, Niranjan SM. Formulation and evaluation of buccoadhesive tablets of atenolol. J Pharm Res 2008; 1 (2): 193-9.
12. Ramana MV, Nagda C, Himaja M. Design and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal drug delivery systems containing metoprolol tartrate. Indian J Pharm Sci 2007; 69(4): 515-8.
13. Patel MV, Prajapati GB, Patel VH, Patel MK. Mucoadhesive bilayer tablets of propranolol hydrochloride. AAPS PharmSciTech 2007; 8(3), Article 77: E1-E6.
14. Swamy PV, Pawandeep Singh, Hiremath SN, Shirsand SB, Neelima K and Raju SA. Preparation and evaluation of chitosan buccal films of diltiazem hydrochloride. Indian Drugs 2007; 44(2): 137-9.
15. Ahuja A, Dogra M, Agarwal SP. Development of buccal tablet of diltiazem hydrochloride. Indian J Pharm Sci 1995; 57 (1): 26-30.
16. Gupta A, Garg S, Khar LK. Measurement of bioadhesive strength of mucoadhesive buccal tablets: design of an in vitro assembly. Indian drugs 1993; 30 (4): 152-5.