Optokinetic nystagmus is elicited by curvilinear optic flow during high speed curve driving

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 16, 2011, Pages 1791-1800

  Authié, Colas N ^a   Mestre, Daniel R ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Curve driving; Eye movements; OKN; Optic flow; Optokinetic nystagmus; Pursuit; Virtual simulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRIVING ABILITY; EYE FIXATION; EYE POSITION; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; OPTIC FLOW; OPTOKINETIC NYSTAGMUS; OPTOKINETIC STIMULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATOR; VELOCITY; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; NYSTAGMUS, OPTOKINETIC; OPTIC FLOW; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79961024033     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Banks M.S., Ehrlich S.M., Backus B.T., Crowell J.A. Estimating heading during real and simulated eye movements. Vision Research 1996, 36:431-443.
2. Brandt T., Dichgans J., Koenig E. Differential effects of central verses peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception. Experimental Brain Research 1973, 16:476-491.
3. Chattington M., Wilson M., Ashford D., Marple-Horvat D.E. Eye-steering coordination in natural driving. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 180:1-14.
4. Coutton-Jean C., Mestre D., Goulon C., Bootsma R. The role of edge lines in curve driving. Transportation Research, Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2009, 12:483-493.
5. Cutting J. Perception with an eye for motion 1986, MIT Press.
6. Dubois M.F., Collewijn H. Optokinetic reactions in man elicited by localized retinal motion stimuli. Vision Research 1979, 19:1105-1115.
7. Elder D.M., Grossberg S., Mingolla E. A neural model of visually guided steering, obstacle avoidance, and route selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:1501-1531.
8. Espié S., Mohellebi H., Kheddar A. A high performance/low-cost mini driving simulator alternative for human factor studies, Paper presented at the Driving Simulation Conference 2003, North America, Dearborn. Michigan 2003, 1:10.
9. Gibson J.J. The perception of the visual world 1950, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
10. Godthelp H. Vehicle control during curve driving. Human Factors 1986, 28:211-221.
11. Gordon D.A. Perceptual basis of vehicular guidance. Public Roads 1966, 34:53-68.
12. Kandil F.I., Rotter A., Lappe M. Driving is smoother and more stable when using the tangent point. Journal of Vision 2009, 9:1-11.
13. Koerner F., Schiller P.H. The optokinetic response under open and closed loop conditions in the monkey. Experimental Brain Research 1972, 14:318-330.
14. Land M.F. The visual control of steering. Vision and Action 1998, 163-180. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. L.R. Harris, M. Jenkin (Eds.).
15. Land M.F., Lee D.N. Where we look when we steer. Nature 1994, 369:742-744.
16. Lappe M., Pekel M., Hoffmann K.P. Optokinetic eye movements elicited by radial optic flow in the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 1998, 79:1461-1480.
17. Lee D.N. The functions of vision. Modes of perceiving and processing information 1978, 59-170. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. H. Pick, E. Salbman (Eds.).
18. Longuet-Higgins H.C., Prazdny K. The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological sciences 1980, 208:385-397.
19. MacDougall H.G., Moore S.T. Functional assessment of head-eye coordination during vehicle operation. Optometry Vision Science 2005, 82:706-715.
20. Mars F. Driving around bends with manipulated eye-steering coordination. Journal of Vision 2008, 8:1-11.
21. Mestre, D. R. (2001). Dynamic evaluation of the useful field of view in driving. In Proceedings of driving assessment (pp. 234-239). University of Iowa Press.
22. Mestre, D. R., Mars, F., Durand, S., Vienne, F., Espié, S. (2005). Gaze behavior during simulated driving: Elements for a visual driving aid. In Proceedings of driving assessment (pp. 304-310). University of Iowa Press.
23. Mestre D.R., Masson G.S. Ocular responses to motion parallax stimuli: The role of perceptual and attentional factors. Vision Research 1997, 37:1627-1641.
24. Miles F.A. The neural processing of 3-D visual information: Evidence from eye movements. European Journal of Neuroscience 1998, 10:811-822.
25. Miles F.A., Busettini C. Ocular compensation for self-motion visual mechanisms. Annals of New-York Academy of Science 1992, 656:220-232.
26. Miles F.A., Busettini C., Masson G.S., Yang D.-S. Short-latency eye movements: Evidence for rapid, parallel processing of optic flow. Optic flow and beyond 2004, 79-107. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht. L.M. Vaina, S.A. Beardsley, S. Rushton (Eds.).
27. Moore S.T., MacDougall H.G., Lesceu X., Speyer J.-J., Wuyts F., Clark J.B. Head-eye coordination during simulated orbiter landing. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine 2008, 79:888-898.
28. Niemann T., Lappe M., Büscher A., Hoffmann K.P. Ocular responses to radial optic flow and single accelerated targets in humans. Vision Research 1999, 39:1359-1371.
29. Owsley, C., & McGwin, G. (in press). Vision and driving. Vision Research. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.021.
30. Regan D., Beverley K.I. How do we avoid confounding the direction we are looking and the direction we are moving?. Science 1982, 215:194-196.
31. Royden C.S., Crowell J.A., Banks M.S. Estimating heading during eye movements. Vision Research 1994, 34:3197-3214.
32. Salvucci D.D., Gray R. A two-point visual control model of steering. Perception 2004, 33:1233-1248.
33. Van Den Berg A.V. Perception of heading. Nature 1993, 365:497-498.
34. Van Der Steen J., Bruno P. Unequal amplitude saccades produced by aniseikonic patterns: Effects of viewing distance. Vision Research 1995, 35:3459-3471.
35. Van Die G.C., Collewijn H. Control of human optokinetic nystagmus by the central and peripheral retina: Effects of partial visual field masking, scotopic vision and central retinal scotomata. Brain Research 1986, 383:185-194.
36. Von Holst E., Mittelstaedt H. Das Reafferenzprinzip (Wechsel-wirkung zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie). Naturwis-senschaften 1950, 37:464-476.
37. Wann J., Land M. Steering with or without the flow: Is the retrieval of heading necessary?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:319-324.
38. Warren W.H., Hannon D.J. Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow. Nature 1988, 336:162-163.
39. Warren W.H., Hannon D.J. Eye movements and optical flow. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1990, 7:160-169.
40. Warren W.H., Mestre D.R., Blackwell A.W., Morris M.W. Perception of circular heading from optical flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1991, 17:28-43.
41. Wilkie R., Wann J. Controlling steering and judging heading: Retinal flow, visual direction, and extraretinal information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:363-378.
42. Wilkie R.M., Wann J.P. Eye-movements aid the control of locomotion. Journal of Vision 2003, 3:677-684.
43. Wilson M., Stephenson S., Chattington M., Marple-Horvat D.E. Eye movements coordinated with steering benefit performance even when vision is denied. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 176:397-412.